* [PATCH] reiserfs: Fix inode mutex - reiserfs lock misordering
@ 2010-11-09 22:35 Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-09 22:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-11-09 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: LKML, Frederic Weisbecker, Markus Gapp, Jan Kara, Al Viro
reiserfs_unpack() locks the inode mutex with
reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe() to protect against reiserfs lock
dependency. However this protection requires to have the
reiserfs lock to be locked.
This is the case if reiserfs_unpack() is called by reiserfs_ioctl
but not from reiserfs_quota_on() when it tries to unpack tails of
quota files.
Fix the ordering of the two locks in reiserfs_unpack() to
fix this issue.
Reported-by: Markus Gapp <markus.gapp@gmx.net>
Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c | 7 +++----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c b/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
index adf22b4..d2a7955 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
@@ -184,12 +184,11 @@ int reiserfs_unpack(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
return 0;
}
- /* we need to make sure nobody is changing the file size beneath
- ** us
- */
- reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(&inode->i_mutex, inode->i_sb);
depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb);
+ /* we need to make sure nobody is changing the file size beneath us */
+ reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(&inode->i_mutex, inode->i_sb);
+
write_from = inode->i_size & (blocksize - 1);
/* if we are on a block boundary, we are already unpacked. */
if (write_from == 0) {
--
1.6.2.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] reiserfs: Fix inode mutex - reiserfs lock misordering
2010-11-09 22:35 [PATCH] reiserfs: Fix inode mutex - reiserfs lock misordering Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2010-11-09 22:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-11-09 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: LKML, Frederic Weisbecker, Markus Gapp, Jan Kara, Al Viro, 2.6.36.x
reiserfs_unpack() locks the inode mutex with
reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe() to protect against reiserfs lock
dependency. However this protection requires to have the
reiserfs lock to be locked.
This is the case if reiserfs_unpack() is called by reiserfs_ioctl
but not from reiserfs_quota_on() when it tries to unpack tails of
quota files.
Fix the ordering of the two locks in reiserfs_unpack() to
fix this issue.
Reported-by: Markus Gapp <markus.gapp@gmx.net>
Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: 2.6.36.x <stable@kernel.org>
---
fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c | 7 +++----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c b/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
index adf22b4..d2a7955 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c
@@ -184,12 +184,11 @@ int reiserfs_unpack(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
return 0;
}
- /* we need to make sure nobody is changing the file size beneath
- ** us
- */
- reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(&inode->i_mutex, inode->i_sb);
depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb);
+ /* we need to make sure nobody is changing the file size beneath us */
+ reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(&inode->i_mutex, inode->i_sb);
+
write_from = inode->i_size & (blocksize - 1);
/* if we are on a block boundary, we are already unpacked. */
if (write_from == 0) {
--
1.6.2.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-09 22:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-09 22:35 [PATCH] reiserfs: Fix inode mutex - reiserfs lock misordering Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-09 22:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®