[PATCH] reiserfs: Don't acquire lock recursively in reiserfs_acl_chmod

[Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>]

reiserfs_acl_chmod() can be called by reiserfs_set_attr() and then
take the reiserfs lock a second time. Thereafter it may call
journal_begin() that definetly requires the lock not to be nested
in order to release it before taking the journal mutex because
the reiserfs lock depends on the journal mutex already.

So, prevent from nesting the lock in reiserfs_acl_chmod().

Reported-by: Pawel Zawora <pzawora@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Pawel Zawora <pzawora@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: 2.6.32.x <stable@kernel.org>
---
 fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
index 536d697..90d2fcb 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_acl.c
@@ -472,7 +472,9 @@ int reiserfs_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode)
 		struct reiserfs_transaction_handle th;
 		size_t size = reiserfs_xattr_nblocks(inode,
 					     reiserfs_acl_size(clone->a_count));
-		reiserfs_write_lock(inode->i_sb);
+		int depth;
+
+		depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb);
 		error = journal_begin(&th, inode->i_sb, size * 2);
 		if (!error) {
 			int error2;
@@ -482,7 +484,7 @@ int reiserfs_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode)
 			if (error2)
 				error = error2;
 		}
-		reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb);
+		reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, depth);
 	}
 	posix_acl_release(clone);
 	return error;
-- 
1.7.3.2