* Re: Change-Id's
[not found] ` <AANLkTikU9L4DeXWJuW4u+UeThzK2GYBMLh59yfHFMzZJ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2010-12-11 23:40 ` Daniel Walker
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Daniel Walker @ 2010-12-11 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 14:23 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2010 7:45 AM, "Daniel Walker" <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > How do people feel about Change-Id's at the end of commit messages?
>
> In general, I think the rule should be that tags are ok as long as
> they are useful for EVERYBODY. if it's some internal company tag,
> expect people to complain. If it doesn't have meaning to others, why
> should it be in the public tree?
Ok .. I couldn't agree with you more.
> If you have some internal tracking thing, just associate the commit
> ids (or " patch ids") with your internal tracker - don't make anybody
> else have to look at crud that gas no meaning to them.
>
> (Sent from my phone so this probably has HTML crud and gets bounced
> from the mailing lists)
Hopefully my reply doesn't get bounced ..
Daniel
--
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread