From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot failure with block/for-next
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:25:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1293128717.7776.68.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101223161312.GC18482@htj.dyndns.org>
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 17:13 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:10:14AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Can you please apply the debug patch I posted in the other message and
> > > post the boot log? Let's see how the partition read is failing.
> >
> > That's actually a red herring ... the disk isn't spinning up, so the
> > partition read is getting a not ready.
>
> Oh, yay, but at any rate I think the don't-clear-media-presence patch
> is probably a good idea just in case UA gets reported somehow.
Well, it wasn't this either. It turns out that this disk alone reports
UNIT_ATTENTION RESET_OCCURRED on the first TEST UNIT READY of spin up.
Ordinarily this is harmless, but the new medium change code wrongly
interprets any UNIT_ATTENTION as medium changed (and then refuses to
talk to the disk). This is actually a change from the previous code, so
the fix is to put it back the way it was.
James
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 6a88fc1..7d25746 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -1008,8 +1008,6 @@ static int media_not_present(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
/* not invoked for commands that could return deferred errors */
switch (sshdr->sense_key) {
case UNIT_ATTENTION:
- sdkp->device->changed = 1;
- /* fall through */
case NOT_READY:
/* medium not present */
if (sshdr->asc == 0x3A) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-23 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-22 17:27 James Bottomley
2010-12-22 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-23 4:31 ` James Bottomley
2010-12-23 10:09 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-23 15:27 ` James Bottomley
2010-12-23 15:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-23 16:10 ` James Bottomley
2010-12-23 16:13 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-23 18:25 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2010-12-24 11:03 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-24 15:47 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1293128717.7776.68.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®