From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot failure with block/for-next
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:09:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101223100956.GA15625@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1293078673.3019.765.camel@mulgrave.site>
Hello, James.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:31:13PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> Actually, surprisingly, bisection confirms it's this patch:
>
> Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed Dec 8 20:57:42 2010 +0100
>
> sd: implement sd_check_events()
>
> I can't quite see how yet.
Does the following patch fix the problem? Thanks.
Subject: sd: don't clear media presence unless it's removable
set_media_not_present() can be called for a non-removable device if it
raises UA for whatever reason; however, block layer calls into
sd_check_events() only if the device is removable. As the function is
responsible for setting media presence, sd continues to think that
media is missing on the non-removable device making it inaccessible.
This patch makes set_media_not_present() clear media presence iff the
device is removable.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: work/drivers/scsi/sd.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ work/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -993,8 +993,11 @@ static void set_media_not_present(struct
{
if (sdkp->media_present)
sdkp->device->changed = 1;
- sdkp->media_present = 0;
- sdkp->capacity = 0;
+
+ if (sdkp->device->removable) {
+ sdkp->media_present = 0;
+ sdkp->capacity = 0;
+ }
}
static int media_not_present(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-23 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-22 17:27 James Bottomley
2010-12-22 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-23 4:31 ` James Bottomley
2010-12-23 10:09 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-12-23 15:27 ` James Bottomley
2010-12-23 15:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-23 16:10 ` James Bottomley
2010-12-23 16:13 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-23 18:25 ` James Bottomley
2010-12-24 11:03 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-24 15:47 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101223100956.GA15625@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®