From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
srostedt@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] tracing: Include module.h in define_trace.h
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:52:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294671171.26623.240.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294670334.11896.8.camel@laptop>
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 15:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 09:14 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > @@ -21,16 +21,6 @@
> > > #undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> >
> > But here we undefine CREATE_TRACE_POINTS, why would this cause a problem
> > in module.h?
>
> I'm not sure what's happening, all I know is that without this change I
> get:
>
> LD vmlinux.o
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xac0): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_request'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x100): first defined here
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xa40): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_get'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x80): first defined here
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x9c0): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_load'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x0): first defined here
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xa80): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_put'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xc0): first defined here
> kernel/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0xa00): multiple definition of `__tracepoint_module_free'
> arch/x86/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x40): first defined here
Hmm, OK, I'm able to reproduce it when I add:
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/syscalls.h>
#undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
as the first thing in ptrace.c. I'll investigate this further.
Thanks!
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tip-3a9f987b3141f086de27832514aad9f50a53f754@git.kernel.org>
2011-01-10 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-10 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-01-10 14:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-10 14:52 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-01-10 15:00 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294671171.26623.240.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®