From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: "eranian@google.com" <eranian@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net" <perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net>,
"eranian@gmail.com" <eranian@gmail.com>,
"robert.richter@amd.com" <robert.richter@amd.com>,
"acme@redhat.com" <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: update PEBS event constraints (v2)
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:56:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299027401.4937.106.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d6d636b.98a1df0a.15d8.57d1@mx.google.com>
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 04:20 +0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch updates PEBS event constraints for Intel Atom, Nehalem, Westmere.
>
> This patch also reorganizes the PEBS format/constraint detection code. It is
> now based on processor model and not PEBS format. Two processors may use the
> same PEBS format without have the same list of PEBS events.
>
> In this second version, we simplified the initialization of the PEBS constraints
> by leveraging the existing switch() statement in perf_event_intel.c. We also
> renamed the constraint tables to be more consistent with regular constraints.
Hi, Stephane
Nice updates.
Wondering where did you get these PEBS event constraints? I didn't find
these in the latest manual.
And some small things, see below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index 084b383..ddf6c4f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -1024,6 +1024,7 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> intel_pmu_lbr_init_core();
>
> x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_core2_event_constraints;
> + x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_core2_pebs_event_constraints;
> pr_cont("Core2 events, ");
> break;
>
> @@ -1036,6 +1037,7 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm();
>
> x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_nehalem_event_constraints;
> + x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_nehalem_pebs_event_constraints;
> x86_pmu.enable_all = intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all;
> pr_cont("Nehalem events, ");
> break;
> @@ -1047,6 +1049,7 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom();
>
> x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_gen_event_constraints;
> + x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_atom_pebs_event_constraints;
> pr_cont("Atom events, ");
> break;
>
> @@ -1059,6 +1062,8 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>
> x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_westmere_event_constraints;
> x86_pmu.enable_all = intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all;
> + x86_pmu.pebs_constraints =
> + intel_westmere_pebs_event_constraints;
> pr_cont("Westmere events, ");
> break;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
> index b7dcd9f..916e6c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
> @@ -361,30 +361,49 @@ static int intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer(void)
> /*
> * PEBS
> */
> -
> -static struct event_constraint intel_core_pebs_events[] = {
> +static struct event_constraint intel_core2_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
> PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0x1), /* INSTR_RETIRED.ANY */
> PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xfec1, 0x1), /* X87_OPS_RETIRED.ANY */
> PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c5, 0x1), /* BR_INST_RETIRED.MISPRED */
> PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x1fc7, 0x1), /* SIMD_INST_RETURED.ANY */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01cb, 0x1), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L1D_MISS */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x02cb, 0x1), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L1D_LINE_MISS */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x04cb, 0x1), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L2_MISS */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x08cb, 0x1), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L2_LINE_MISS */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x10cb, 0x1), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.DTLB_MISS */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xcb, 0x1), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.* */
> + EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
> +};
> +
> +static struct event_constraint intel_atom_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
> + PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0x1), /* INSTR_RETIRED.ANY */
> + PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c5, 0x1), /* BR_INST_RETIRED.MISPRED */
> + PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0ac4, 0x1), /* BR_INST_RETIRED.MISPRED */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xcb, 0x1), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.* */
> EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
> };
>
> -static struct event_constraint intel_nehalem_pebs_events[] = {
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0xf), /* INSTR_RETIRED.ANY */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xfec1, 0xf), /* X87_OPS_RETIRED.ANY */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c5, 0xf), /* BR_INST_RETIRED.MISPRED */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x1fc7, 0xf), /* SIMD_INST_RETURED.ANY */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x01cb, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L1D_MISS */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x02cb, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L1D_LINE_MISS */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x04cb, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L2_MISS */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x08cb, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.L2_LINE_MISS */
> - PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x10cb, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.DTLB_MISS */
> +static struct event_constraint intel_nehalem_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0b, 0xf), /* MEM_INST_RETIRED.* */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0f, 0xf), /* MEM_UNCORE_RETIRED.* */
> + PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x010c, 0xf), /* MEM_STORE_RETIRED.DTLB_MISS */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc0, 0xf), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc2, 0xf), /* UOPS_RETIRED.* */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c4, 0xf),/* BR_INST_RETIRED.* */
- INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c4, 0xf)
+ INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc4, 0xf)
> + PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x02c5, 0xf), /* BR_MISP_RETIRED.NEAR_CALL */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc7, 0xf), /* SSEX_UOPS_RETIRED.* */
> + PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x20c8, 0xf), /* ITLB_MISS_RETIRED */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xcb, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.* */
> + EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
> +};
> +
> +static struct event_constraint intel_westmere_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0b, 0xf), /* MEM_INST_RETIRED.* */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0f, 0xf), /* MEM_UNCORE_RETIRED.* */
> + PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x010c, 0xf), /* MEM_STORE_RETIRED.DTLB_MISS */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc0, 0xf), /* INSTR_RETIRED.* */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc2, 0xf), /* UOPS_RETIRED.* */
> +
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc4, 0xf), /* BR_INST_RETIRED.* */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc5, 0xf), /* BR_MISP_RETIRED.* */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc7, 0xf), /* SSEX_UOPS_RETIRED.* */
> + PEBS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x20c8, 0xf), /* ITLB_MISS_RETIRED */
> + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xcb, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_RETIRED.* */
> EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
> };
>
> @@ -695,20 +714,18 @@ static void intel_ds_init(void)
> printk(KERN_CONT "PEBS fmt0%c, ", pebs_type);
> x86_pmu.pebs_record_size = sizeof(struct pebs_record_core);
> x86_pmu.drain_pebs = intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core;
> - x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_core_pebs_events;
> break;
>
> case 1:
> printk(KERN_CONT "PEBS fmt1%c, ", pebs_type);
> x86_pmu.pebs_record_size = sizeof(struct pebs_record_nhm);
> x86_pmu.drain_pebs = intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm;
> - x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_nehalem_pebs_events;
> break;
>
> default:
> - printk(KERN_CONT "no PEBS fmt%d%c, ", format, pebs_type);
> + printk(KERN_CONT "no PEBS fmt%d%c, ",
> + format, pebs_type);
No changes?
> x86_pmu.pebs = 0;
> - break;
> }
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-01 20:20 Stephane Eranian
2011-03-02 0:56 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2011-03-02 7:45 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-03-02 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-04 21:19 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1299027401.4937.106.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®