From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net" <perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net>,
"eranian@gmail.com" <eranian@gmail.com>,
"robert.richter@amd.com" <robert.richter@amd.com>,
"acme@redhat.com" <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: update PEBS event constraints (v2)
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 09:14:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110302081430.GE15665@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimkAuDQOW8J=vqcz-7r9gaN_=qq1=guBh6n6A7u@mail.gmail.com>
* Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 04:20 +0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> This patch updates PEBS event constraints for Intel Atom, Nehalem, Westmere.
> >>
> >> This patch also reorganizes the PEBS format/constraint detection code. It is
> >> now based on processor model and not PEBS format. Two processors may use the
> >> same PEBS format without have the same list of PEBS events.
> >>
> >> In this second version, we simplified the initialization of the PEBS constraints
> >> by leveraging the existing switch() statement in perf_event_intel.c. We also
> >> renamed the constraint tables to be more consistent with regular constraints.
> >
> > Hi, Stephane
> >
> > Nice updates.
> > Wondering where did you get these PEBS event constraints? I didn't find
> > these in the latest manual.
> >
> Yeah, the manual is lacking some information. The other source of information
> is the PTU event files (whatif.intel.com).
Plus i suspect you have performed testing on affected CPUs as well?
If yes then i think we want to push these fixes via perf/urgent - they seem to
nicely round up the constraints.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-01 20:20 Stephane Eranian
2011-03-02 0:56 ` Lin Ming
2011-03-02 7:45 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-03-02 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-03-04 21:19 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110302081430.GE15665@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®