From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/14] xen: events: remove use of nr_irqs as upper bound on number of pirqs
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:08:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299773295-348-12-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299773279.17339.813.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
There isn't really much relationship between the two, other than
nr_irqs often being the larger of the two.
Allows us to remove a nr_irqs sized array, the only users of this
array are MSI setup and restore, neither of which are particularly
performance critical.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
---
drivers/xen/events.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
index 002283e..6782251 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
@@ -107,8 +107,6 @@ struct irq_info
#define PIRQ_NEEDS_EOI (1 << 0)
#define PIRQ_SHAREABLE (1 << 1)
-static int *pirq_to_irq;
-
static int *evtchn_to_irq;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [NR_EVENT_CHANNELS/BITS_PER_LONG],
@@ -196,8 +194,6 @@ static void xen_irq_info_pirq_init(unsigned irq,
info->u.pirq.gsi = gsi;
info->u.pirq.vector = vector;
info->u.pirq.flags = flags;
-
- pirq_to_irq[pirq] = irq;
}
/*
@@ -247,16 +243,6 @@ static unsigned pirq_from_irq(unsigned irq)
return info->u.pirq.pirq;
}
-static unsigned gsi_from_irq(unsigned irq)
-{
- struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
-
- BUG_ON(info == NULL);
- BUG_ON(info->type != IRQT_PIRQ);
-
- return info->u.pirq.gsi;
-}
-
static enum xen_irq_type type_from_irq(unsigned irq)
{
return info_for_irq(irq)->type;
@@ -653,12 +639,6 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_gsi_to_irq(unsigned gsi,
spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
- if (pirq > nr_irqs) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "xen_map_pirq_gsi: pirq %d > nr_irqs %d!\n",
- pirq, nr_irqs);
- goto out;
- }
-
irq = find_irq_by_gsi(gsi);
if (irq != -1) {
printk(KERN_INFO "xen_map_pirq_gsi: returning irq %d for gsi %u\n",
@@ -758,7 +738,6 @@ int xen_destroy_irq(int irq)
goto out;
}
}
- pirq_to_irq[info->u.pirq.pirq] = -1;
xen_free_irq(irq);
@@ -769,7 +748,24 @@ out:
int xen_irq_from_pirq(unsigned pirq)
{
- return pirq_to_irq[pirq];
+ int irq;
+
+ struct irq_info *info;
+
+ spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(info, &xen_irq_list_head, list) {
+ if (info == NULL || info->type != IRQT_PIRQ)
+ continue;
+ irq = info->irq;
+ if (info->u.pirq.pirq == pirq)
+ goto out;
+ }
+ irq = -1;
+out:
+ spin_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
+
+ return irq;
}
int bind_evtchn_to_irq(unsigned int evtchn)
@@ -1269,15 +1265,18 @@ static void restore_pirqs(void)
{
int pirq, rc, irq, gsi;
struct physdev_map_pirq map_irq;
+ struct irq_info *info;
- for (pirq = 0; pirq < nr_irqs; pirq++) {
- irq = pirq_to_irq[pirq];
- if (irq == -1)
+ list_for_each_entry(info, &xen_irq_list_head, list) {
+ if (info->type != IRQT_PIRQ)
continue;
+ pirq = info->u.pirq.pirq;
+ gsi = info->u.pirq.gsi;
+ irq = info->irq;
+
/* save/restore of PT devices doesn't work, so at this point the
* only devices present are GSI based emulated devices */
- gsi = gsi_from_irq(irq);
if (!gsi)
continue;
@@ -1291,7 +1290,6 @@ static void restore_pirqs(void)
printk(KERN_WARNING "xen map irq failed gsi=%d irq=%d pirq=%d rc=%d\n",
gsi, irq, pirq, rc);
xen_free_irq(irq);
- pirq_to_irq[pirq] = -1;
continue;
}
@@ -1512,13 +1510,6 @@ void __init xen_init_IRQ(void)
{
int i;
- /* We are using nr_irqs as the maximum number of pirq available but
- * that number is actually chosen by Xen and we don't know exactly
- * what it is. Be careful choosing high pirq numbers. */
- pirq_to_irq = kcalloc(nr_irqs, sizeof(*pirq_to_irq), GFP_KERNEL);
- for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
- pirq_to_irq[i] = -1;
-
evtchn_to_irq = kcalloc(NR_EVENT_CHANNELS, sizeof(*evtchn_to_irq),
GFP_KERNEL);
for (i = 0; i < NR_EVENT_CHANNELS; i++)
--
1.5.6.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-10 16:07 [GIT PATCH v2 0/14] xen: events: cleanups + ween off nr_irqs Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 01/14] xen: events: separate two unrelated halves of if condition Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 02/14] xen: events: fix xen_map_pirq_gsi error return Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 03/14] xen: events: simplify comment Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 04/14] xen: events: remove unused public functions Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 05/14] xen: events: rename restore_cpu_pirqs -> restore_pirqs Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 06/14] xen: events: refactor GSI pirq bindings functions Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 07/14] xen: events: use per-cpu variable for cpu_evtchn_mask Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 08/14] xen: events: turn irq_info constructors into initialiser functions Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 09/14] xen: events: push setup of irq<->{evtchn,ipi,virq,pirq} maps into irq_info init functions Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 10/14] xen: events: maintain a list of Xen interrupts Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 11/14] xen: events: dynamically allocate irq info structures Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 13/14] xen: events: do not workaround too-small nr_irqs Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 16:08 ` [PATCH 14/14] xen: events: propagate irq allocation failure instead of panicking Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 22:57 ` [GIT PATCH v2 0/14] xen: events: cleanups + ween off nr_irqs Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-10 23:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-11 9:14 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-11 0:38 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-11 9:17 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-11 9:12 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-11 11:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-03-11 13:28 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-11 14:24 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-11 14:32 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-11 14:46 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-11 14:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-11 14:46 ` Ian Campbell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-09 17:40 [GIT PATCH " Ian Campbell
2011-03-09 17:41 ` [PATCH 12/14] xen: events: remove use of nr_irqs as upper bound on number of pirqs Ian Campbell
2011-03-10 5:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-10 8:57 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1299773295-348-12-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®