From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>,
Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 19:17:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12ab1762-e635-42d6-ab0b-e3358e3b32c2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826082641.2007658-6-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
On 8/26/26 16:26, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> Large folio can contain multiple dirty ranges.
> Add a folio-based writeback path for large-folio mapping files
> and keep the legacy f2fs_write_cache_pages() path unchanged for
> non large-folio mapping files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 404 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 398 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index dff802725544..608d8ea8e607 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
> struct folio *folio = fi.folio;
> unsigned int nr_pages = fi.length >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> enum count_type type;
> + bool finished = true;
>
> if (fscrypt_is_bounce_folio(folio)) {
> struct folio *io_folio = folio;
> @@ -388,11 +389,20 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
> folio->index, NODE_TYPE_REGULAR, true);
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, folio->index != nid_of_node(folio));
> }
> + if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs =
> + (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +
> + finished = atomic_sub_and_test(nr_pages,
> + &ffs->write_pages_pending);
> + }
> +
> + while (nr_pages--)
> + dec_page_count(sbi, type);
> +
> if (f2fs_in_warm_node_list(folio))
> f2fs_del_fsync_node_entry(sbi, folio);
>
> - dec_page_count(sbi, type);
We should not relocate dec_page_count() above f2fs_in_warm_node_list() to
avoid racing bugs.
> -
> /*
> * we should access sbi before folio_end_writeback() to
> * avoid racing w/ kill_f2fs_super()
> @@ -401,8 +411,10 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
> wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
> wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
>
> - folio_clear_f2fs_gcing(folio);
> - folio_end_writeback(folio);
> + if (finished) {
> + folio_clear_f2fs_gcing(folio);
> + folio_end_writeback(folio);
> + }
> }
>
> bio_put(bio);
> @@ -2669,7 +2681,7 @@ static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> }
>
> -static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> +void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> size_t offset, size_t len)
> {
> struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> @@ -2692,6 +2704,86 @@ static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> }
>
> +static bool __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs, size_t offset, size_t len)
> +{
> + unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> + unsigned int start, end;
> +
> + start = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + end = (offset + len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + end = min(end, nr_subpages);
> +
> + bitmap_clear(ffs->state, nr_subpages + start, end - start);
> + return find_next_bit(ffs->state, 2 * nr_subpages, nr_subpages) <
> + 2 * nr_subpages;
> +}
> +
> +void f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> + return;
> +
> + ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + __ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, ffs, offset, len);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ffs_next_dirty_subpage(struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs,
> + const struct folio *folio, unsigned int start,
> + unsigned int end)
> +{
> + unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> + return find_next_bit(ffs->state, nr_subpages + end + 1,
> + nr_subpages + start) - nr_subpages;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ffs_next_clean_subpage(struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs,
> + const struct folio *folio, unsigned int start,
> + unsigned int end)
> +{
> + unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> + return find_next_zero_bit(ffs->state, nr_subpages + end + 1,
> + nr_subpages + start) - nr_subpages;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ffs_find_dirty_range(struct folio *folio,
> + u64 *range_start, u64 range_end)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> + unsigned int start, end, nr_pages;
> +
> + if (*range_start >= range_end)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> + return range_end - *range_start;
> +
> + ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> + start = offset_in_folio(folio, *range_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + end = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_not_zero(offset_in_folio(folio, range_end),
> + folio_size(folio)), PAGE_SIZE) - 1;
> +
> + start = ffs_next_dirty_subpage(ffs, folio, start, end);
> + if (start > end)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (start == end)
> + nr_pages = 1;
> + else
> + nr_pages = ffs_next_clean_subpage(ffs, folio,
> + start + 1, end) - start;
> +
> + *range_start = folio_pos(folio) + ((u64)start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + return (u64)nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
> static bool find_next_valid_block(const struct folio *folio,
> size_t orig_off, size_t *need_off,
> size_t len)
> @@ -3309,6 +3401,139 @@ int f2fs_do_write_data_page(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int f2fs_write_single_data_folio(struct folio *folio, int *submitted,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc,
> + enum iostat_type io_type,
> + u64 start, u64 end)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
> + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> + bool atomic_commit = f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) &&
> + folio_test_f2fs_atomic(folio);
> + struct inode *dn_inode = atomic_commit ?
> + F2FS_I(inode)->cow_inode : inode;
> + u64 pos = folio_pos(folio);
> + pgoff_t start_idx = (start - pos) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + pgoff_t end_idx = (end - 1 - pos) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + int local_submitted = 0;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + for (pgoff_t i = start_idx; i <= end_idx; i++) {
> + struct dnode_of_data dn;
> + struct node_info ni;
> + pgoff_t data_idx = folio->index + i;
> + bool ipu_force = false;
> + struct f2fs_io_info fio = {
> + .sbi = sbi,
> + .ino = inode->i_ino,
> + .type = DATA,
> + .op = REQ_OP_WRITE,
> + .op_flags = wbc_to_write_flags(wbc),
> + .old_blkaddr = NULL_ADDR,
> + .folio = folio,
> + .folio_offset = i,
> + .folio_blkcnt = 1,
> + .encrypted_page = NULL,
> + .submitted = 0,
> + .need_lock = LOCK_DONE,
> + .meta_gc = f2fs_meta_inode_gc_required(inode) ? 1 : 0,
> + .io_type = io_type,
> + .io_wbc = wbc,
> + };
> +
> + if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs =
> + (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +
> + atomic_inc(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> + }
> +
> + set_new_dnode(&dn, dn_inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> +
> + if (!atomic_commit && need_inplace_update(&fio) &&
In f2fs_write_single_data_page(), we didn't have !atomic_commit condition
in the check? can we drop !atomic_commit check?
need_inplace_update() has checked w/ f2fs_used_in_atomic_write().
- need_inplace_update
- f2fs_should_update_outplace
- f2fs_used_in_atomic_write
static inline bool f2fs_used_in_atomic_write(struct inode *inode)
{
return f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) || f2fs_is_cow_file(inode);
}
> + f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, data_idx,
> + &fio.old_blkaddr)) {
> + if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, fio.old_blkaddr,
> + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> + err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + goto rollback;
> + }
> + ipu_force = true;
> + goto got_it;
> + }
> +
> + err = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, data_idx, LOOKUP_NODE);
> + if (err)
> + goto rollback;
> +
> + fio.old_blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
> +
> +got_it:
> + if (__is_valid_data_blkaddr(fio.old_blkaddr) &&
> + !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, fio.old_blkaddr,
> + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> + err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + goto rollback;
> + }
> +
> + if (fio.meta_gc)
> + f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback(inode, fio.old_blkaddr);
> +
> + if (!atomic_commit && (ipu_force ||
> + (__is_valid_data_blkaddr(fio.old_blkaddr) &&
> + need_inplace_update(&fio)))) {
> + err = f2fs_encrypt_one_page(&fio);
> + if (err)
> + goto rollback;
> +
> + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> + err = f2fs_inplace_write_data(&fio);
> + if (err) {
> + if (fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto(inode))
> + fscrypt_finalize_bounce_page(
> + &fio.encrypted_page);
> + goto rollback_no_dnode;
> + }
> +
> + local_submitted++;
> + set_inode_flag(inode, FI_UPDATE_WRITE);
trace_f2fs_do_write_data_page(folio, IPU);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + err = f2fs_get_node_info(sbi, dn.nid, &ni, false);
> + if (err)
> + goto rollback;
> +
> + fio.version = ni.version;
> +
> + err = f2fs_encrypt_one_page(&fio);
> + if (err)
> + goto rollback;
> +
> + f2fs_outplace_write_data(&dn, &fio);
> + local_submitted++;
> + set_inode_flag(inode, FI_APPEND_WRITE);
> + trace_f2fs_do_write_data_page(folio, OPU);
> + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> + continue;
> +
> +rollback:
> + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> +rollback_no_dnode:
> + if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs =
> + (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +
> + atomic_dec(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (submitted)
> + *submitted = local_submitted;
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct folio *folio, int *submitted,
> struct bio **bio,
> sector_t *last_block,
> @@ -3757,6 +3982,170 @@ static int f2fs_write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int f2fs_write_cache_folios(struct address_space *mapping,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc,
> + enum iostat_type io_type)
> +{
> + struct folio *folio = NULL;
> + struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> + struct f2fs_lock_context lc;
> + u64 pos = 0;
> + u64 end_pos = 0;
> + u32 r_len = 0;
> + int err = 0;
> + int submitted = 0;
> + int nwritten = 0;
> + bool op_locked = false;
> + bool next = false;
> + bool retry = false;
> +
> + if (get_dirty_pages(inode) <= SM_I(sbi)->min_hot_blocks)
> + set_inode_flag(inode, FI_HOT_DATA);
> + else
> + clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_HOT_DATA);
> +
> + while ((folio = writeback_iter(mapping, wbc, folio, &err))) {
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = NULL;
> + u64 isize;
> + size_t poff;
> + pgoff_t end_index;
> + bool verity_in_progress;
> + int folio_submitted = 0;
> + bool bias_added = false;
> +
> + submitted = 0;
> + next = true;
> + retry = false;
> +
> + if (atomic_read(&sbi->wb_sync_req[DATA]) &&
> + wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
> + folio_redirty_for_writepage(wbc, folio);
> + next = false;
> + goto retry_out;
> + }
> +retry:
> + pos = folio_pos(folio);
> + end_pos = pos + folio_size(folio);
> + isize = i_size_read(inode);
> + verity_in_progress = f2fs_verity_in_progress(inode);
> + poff = 0;
> + end_index = 0;
> +
> + if (retry) {
> + if (unlikely(folio->mapping != mapping))
> + goto retry_out;
> +
> + if (!folio_test_dirty(folio))
> + goto retry_out;
> +
> + if (folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
> + if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
> + goto retry_out;
> + f2fs_folio_wait_writeback(folio, DATA, true, true);
> + }
> +
> + if (!folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio))
> + goto retry_out;
> + }
> +
> + /* To avoid dealing with the complexity for one subrange is in bio
> + * while we trylock_op failed before writing another subrange.
> + * Try to lock_op before any subrange write for the folio.
> + */
> + if (!op_locked) {
> + if (!f2fs_trylock_op(sbi, &lc)) {
> + folio_redirty_for_writepage(wbc, folio);
> + err = 0;
> + if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL)
> + goto retry_out;
> +
> + retry = true;
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + f2fs_io_schedule_timeout(DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + folio_lock(folio);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> + op_locked = true;
> + }
> +
> + if (!verity_in_progress) {
> + poff = offset_in_folio(folio, isize);
> + end_index = isize >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (folio->index > end_index ||
> + (folio->index == end_index && poff == 0))
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (end_pos > isize) {
> + folio_zero_segment(folio, poff, folio_size(folio));
> + end_pos = isize;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + folio_start_writeback(folio);
> +
> + if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> + if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
Can you explain why there is no ffs for a dirty large folio?
Thanks,
> + ffs = f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
> + f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(folio, 0, end_pos - pos);
> + } else {
> + ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> + }
> + if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio) && !bias_added) {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&ffs->write_pages_pending) != 0);
> + atomic_inc(&ffs->write_pages_pending);
> + bias_added = true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + while ((r_len = ffs_find_dirty_range(folio, &pos, end_pos))) {
> + err = f2fs_write_single_data_folio(folio, &submitted,
> + wbc, io_type, pos, pos + r_len);
> + folio_submitted += submitted;
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + nwritten += submitted;
> + pos += r_len;
> + }
> +
> + if (!err && folio_submitted &&
> + f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) &&
> + folio_test_f2fs_atomic(folio))
> + folio_clear_f2fs_atomic(folio);
> +
> +out:
> + f2fs_ffs_clear_subrange_dirty(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
> + inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> +
> + if (bias_added) {
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ffs->write_pages_pending))
> + folio_end_writeback(folio);
> + } else if (!folio_submitted && folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
> + folio_end_writeback(folio);
> + }
> +
> +retry_out:
> + if (folio_test_locked(folio))
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> +
> + if (op_locked) {
> + f2fs_unlock_op(sbi, &lc);
> + op_locked = false;
> + }
> +
> + if (err || !next)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (nwritten)
> + f2fs_submit_merged_write_cond(F2FS_M_SB(mapping), mapping->host,
> + NULL, 0, DATA);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool __should_serialize_io(struct inode *inode,
> struct writeback_control *wbc)
> {
> @@ -3851,7 +4240,10 @@ static int __f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> account_writeback(inode, true);
>
> blk_start_plug(&plug);
> - ret = f2fs_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, io_type);
> + if (mapping_large_folio_support(inode->i_mapping))
> + ret = f2fs_write_cache_folios(mapping, wbc, io_type);
> + else
> + ret = f2fs_write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, io_type);
> blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>
> account_writeback(inode, false);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 8:26 [PATCH 00/14] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 6:57 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 20:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 7:16 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 21:06 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 8:56 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 21:13 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 9:24 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 11:17 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-08-27 22:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 12:36 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-28 17:18 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:44 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:52 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12ab1762-e635-42d6-ab0b-e3358e3b32c2@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
--cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
--cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
--cc=nzzhao@126.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
--cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®