From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>,
Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 16:56:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83fe187e-e3e8-4328-bbbf-a6751873b9e0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826082641.2007658-4-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
On 8/26/26 16:26, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> To avoid the complexity of unlocking a large folio in write_begin,
> preallocate partial blocks for inodes that can use large folios.
> During write_begin, read only the partial head and tail 4K subpages
> that need read-before-write, and skip read I/O for the full middle
> subpages covered by the write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 289 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 17 ++-
> 3 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 8649d443ca74..7ce96ae02cfc 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1249,6 +1249,40 @@ static void f2fs_submit_page_read(struct inode *inode, struct fsverity_info *vi,
> f2fs_submit_read_bio(sbi, bio, DATA);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Synchronously read a single 4K subpage by reusing f2fs_submit_page_read()
> + * so that iostat, trace, blk-crypto and post-read handling are all preserved.
> + * The caller must have already allocated ffs for the folio.
> + */
> +static int f2fs_submit_page_read_sync(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio,
> + pgoff_t index, block_t blkaddr)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* Add bias so end_io does not call folio_end_read(). */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + ffs->read_pages_pending++;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +
> + f2fs_submit_page_read(inode, NULL, folio, index, blkaddr,
> + REQ_OP_READ, false);
> +
> + /* Wait for pending drops back to bias which indicates all bio have completed. */
> + while (READ_ONCE(ffs->read_pages_pending) != 1)
> + f2fs_io_schedule_timeout(DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
Suspect there will be potential performance issue, as timeout interval is
large.
> +
> + /* Remove the bias. */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + ffs->read_pages_pending--;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
Looks hacky.
If large folio has 4 sub pages, first 3 pages are uptodate.
Then we use f2fs_submit_page_read_sync() to read last page,
in f2fs_finish_read_bio(), we update state bitmap of last page to 1,
but as read_pages_pending is 1, so folio won't be set as uptodate.
Oh, in f2fs_write_end(), we have another change to set folio uptodate
though, so the flow is a little bit different here.
> +
> + if (!f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void __set_data_blkaddr(struct dnode_of_data *dn, block_t blkaddr)
> {
> __le32 *addr = get_dnode_addr(dn->inode, dn->node_folio);
> @@ -2582,6 +2616,112 @@ static void ffs_detach_free(struct folio *folio)
> kfree(ffs);
> }
>
> +bool f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(const struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> + unsigned int idx;
> +
> + if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> + return folio_test_uptodate(folio);
> +
> + if (!folio_contains(folio, index))
> + return false;
Can we check this out of f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate()? and add a sanity
check here:
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !folio_contains(folio, index));
> +
> + ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> + idx = index - folio->index;
> + return test_bit(idx, ffs->state);
> +}
> +
> +static bool __ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(struct folio *folio,
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs, size_t offset, size_t len)
> +{
> + unsigned int nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> + unsigned int start, end;
> +
> + start = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + end = (offset + len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + end = min(end, nr_subpages);
> +
> + bitmap_set(ffs->state, start, end - start);
> + return bitmap_full(ffs->state, nr_subpages);
> +}
> +
> +static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + bool mark_uptodate = false;
> +
> + f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_F_SB(folio), offset + len > folio_size(folio));
> +
> + if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> + folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + mark_uptodate = __ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(folio, ffs, offset, len) &&
> + !ffs->read_pages_pending;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + if (mark_uptodate)
> + folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> +}
> +
> +static void f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(struct folio *folio,
> + size_t offset, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> + unsigned int nr_subpages, start, end;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_F_SB(folio), offset + len > folio_size(folio));
> +
> + if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio))
> + return;
> +
> + ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> + nr_subpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> + start = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + end = (offset + len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + end = min(end, nr_subpages);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + bitmap_set(ffs->state, nr_subpages + start, end - start);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static bool find_next_valid_block(const struct folio *folio,
> + size_t orig_off, size_t *need_off,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + size_t start = orig_off;
> + size_t end = start + len;
> + size_t head, tail;
> + pgoff_t index;
> +
> + if (start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) {
> + head = round_down(start, PAGE_SIZE);
> + index = folio->index + (head >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + if (!f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index)) {
> + *need_off = head;
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (end & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) {
> + tail = round_down(end - 1, PAGE_SIZE);
> + index = folio->index + (tail >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + if (!f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(folio, index)) {
> + *need_off = tail;
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> struct fsverity_info *vi,
> struct readahead_control *rac, struct folio *folio)
> @@ -3975,6 +4115,102 @@ static int prepare_atomic_write_begin(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int prepare_large_folio_write_begin(struct inode *inode,
> + struct folio *folio, loff_t pos,
> + unsigned int len)
> +{
> + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> + size_t ori_off = offset_in_folio(folio, pos);
> + size_t need_off = ori_off;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + len = min_t(unsigned int, len, folio_size(folio) - ori_off);
> +
> + /*
> + * When folio minimum order is non-zero, the fsverity
> + * page_cache_write() path enters f2fs_write_begin() via
> + * aops->write_begin without going through f2fs_write_iter(),
> + * so preallocation from f2fs_write_iter() is skipped. In that
> + * case, if FI_PREALLOCATED_ALL is not set, we must preallocate
> + * the write blocks here.
> + */
> + if (!is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_PREALLOCATED_ALL)) {
> + struct f2fs_map_blocks map = {};
> +
> + map.m_lblk = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(pos);
> + map.m_len = F2FS_BLK_ALIGN(pos + len) - map.m_lblk;
> +
> + if (!IS_DEVICE_ALIASING(inode))
> + map.m_may_create = true;
> + map.m_seg_type = NO_CHECK_TYPE;
> +
> + err = f2fs_map_blocks(inode, &map, F2FS_GET_BLOCK_PRE_AIO);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Skip read and ffs allocation if the folio is already fully
> + * uptodate or the write covers the entire folio.
> + */
> + if (folio_test_uptodate(folio) || len == folio_size(folio))
> + return 0;
Do we need to adopt fsverity like we did in f2fs_write_begin()?
if (!(pos & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) && (pos + len) >= i_size_read(inode) &&
!f2fs_verity_in_progress(inode)) {
folio_zero_segment(folio, len, folio_size(folio));
return 0;
}
> +
> + ffs = f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc() will never fail.
> + if (!ffs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Inline data must have been converted before reaching here. */
> + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, f2fs_has_inline_data(inode));
> +
> + while (find_next_valid_block(folio, ori_off,
> + &need_off, len)) {
> + struct dnode_of_data dn;
> + pgoff_t index = folio->index + (need_off >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + block_t blkaddr;
> + bool get_dn = false;
> +
> + if (!f2fs_lookup_read_extent_cache_block(inode, index,
> + &blkaddr)) {
> + if (IS_DEVICE_ALIASING(inode))
> + return -ENODATA;
> +
> + set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> + err = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, index, LOOKUP_NODE);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + get_dn = true;
> + blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
> +
> + if (blkaddr == NEW_ADDR) {
> + size_t off = offset_in_folio(folio,
> + index << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> + folio_zero_segment(folio, off, off + PAGE_SIZE);
> + f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(folio, off,
> + PAGE_SIZE);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr,
> + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)) {
> + err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + err = f2fs_submit_page_read_sync(inode, folio, index, blkaddr);
> +out:
> + if (get_dn)
> + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int f2fs_write_begin(const struct kiocb *iocb,
> struct address_space *mapping,
> loff_t pos, unsigned len, struct folio **foliop,
> @@ -3986,6 +4222,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_begin(const struct kiocb *iocb,
> pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> bool need_balance = false;
> block_t blkaddr = NULL_ADDR;
> + fgf_t fgp = FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT;
> int err = 0;
>
> trace_f2fs_write_begin(inode, pos, len);
> @@ -4033,9 +4270,9 @@ static int f2fs_write_begin(const struct kiocb *iocb,
> * Do not use FGP_STABLE to avoid deadlock.
> * Will wait that below with our IO control.
> */
> - folio = f2fs_filemap_get_folio(mapping, index,
> - FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT,
> - mapping_gfp_mask(mapping));
> + fgp |= fgf_set_order(len);
> + folio = __filemap_get_folio(mapping, index, fgp,
> + mapping_gfp_mask(mapping));
It detaches from fault injection, why we need to change to use
__filemap_get_folio()?
> if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(folio);
> goto fail;
> @@ -4048,7 +4285,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_begin(const struct kiocb *iocb,
> if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode))
> err = prepare_atomic_write_begin(sbi, folio, pos, len,
> &blkaddr, &need_balance);
> - else
> + else if (!folio_test_large(folio))
> err = prepare_write_begin(sbi, folio, pos, len,
> &blkaddr, &need_balance);
> if (err)
> @@ -4069,6 +4306,14 @@ static int f2fs_write_begin(const struct kiocb *iocb,
>
> f2fs_folio_wait_writeback(folio, DATA, false, true);
>
> + if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> + err = prepare_large_folio_write_begin(inode,
> + folio, pos, len);
> + if (!err)
> + return 0;
> + goto put_folio;
> + }
> +
> if (len == folio_size(folio) || folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -4129,15 +4374,20 @@ static int f2fs_write_end(const struct kiocb *iocb,
> trace_f2fs_write_end(inode, pos, len, copied);
>
> /*
> - * This should be come from len == PAGE_SIZE, and we expect copied
> - * should be PAGE_SIZE. Otherwise, we treat it with zero copied and
> - * let generic_perform_write() try to copy data again through copied=0.
> + * If a short copy happens on a folio that isn't uptodate, we treat
> + * it with zero copied and let generic_perform_write() try to copy
> + * data again through copied=0.
> */
> if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> - if (unlikely(copied != len))
> + if (unlikely(copied != len)) {
> copied = 0;
> - else
> + } else if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> + f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(folio,
> + offset_in_folio(folio, pos), len);
> + } else {
> + /* This should be come from len == PAGE_SIZE */
> folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + }
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION
> @@ -4156,6 +4406,9 @@ static int f2fs_write_end(const struct kiocb *iocb,
> if (!copied)
> goto unlock_out;
>
> + if (folio_test_large(folio))
> + f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_dirty(folio, offset_in_folio(folio, pos),
> + copied);
> folio_mark_dirty(folio);
>
> if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode))
> @@ -4218,8 +4471,22 @@ static bool f2fs_dirty_data_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
>
> trace_f2fs_set_page_dirty(folio, DATA);
>
> - if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> - folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> + bool uptodate = true;
> +
> + if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs =
> + (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> + uptodate = bitmap_full(ffs->state, folio_nr_pages(folio)) &&
> + !ffs->read_pages_pending;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
f2fs_ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(folio, 0, folio_size(folio)); ?
> + }
> + if (uptodate)
> + folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> + }
> BUG_ON(folio_test_swapcache(folio));
>
> if (filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio)) {
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 31ddd321daf6..ae6031693700 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -4342,6 +4342,7 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct folio *folio, int *submitted,
> struct writeback_control *wbc,
> enum iostat_type io_type,
> int compr_blocks, bool allow_balance);
> +bool f2fs_ffs_test_blk_uptodate(const struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index);
> void f2fs_write_failed(struct inode *inode, loff_t to);
> void f2fs_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t length);
> bool f2fs_release_folio(struct folio *folio, gfp_t wait);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index d440231b8cb9..e40285d4f9c2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -5405,9 +5405,20 @@ static int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - /* Do not preallocate blocks that will be written partially in 4KB. */
> - map.m_lblk = F2FS_BLK_ALIGN(pos);
> - map.m_len = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(pos + count);
> + if (mapping_large_folio_support(inode->i_mapping)) {
> + /*
> + * Preallocate all blocks touched by a large-folio buffered write so
> + * the regular write_begin path does not need to unlock the folio for
> + * f2fs_balance_fs(). Rechecking large-folio state after unlock is
> + * unreliable since partial truncation can split the folio.
You mean buffered io case, right? so we need to check !dio as well?
Thanks,
> + */
> + map.m_lblk = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(pos);
> + map.m_len = F2FS_BLK_ALIGN(pos + count);
> + } else {
> + /* Do not preallocate blocks that will be written partially in 4KB. */
> + map.m_lblk = F2FS_BLK_ALIGN(pos);
> + map.m_len = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(pos + count);
> + }
> if (map.m_len > map.m_lblk)
> map.m_len -= map.m_lblk;
> else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 8:26 [PATCH 00/14] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 01/14] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 6:57 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 20:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 02/14] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 7:16 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 21:06 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 8:56 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-08-27 21:13 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 04/14] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 9:24 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 11:17 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-27 22:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 06/14] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-27 12:36 ` Chao Yu
2026-08-28 17:18 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 08/14] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 09/14] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 8:26 ` [PATCH 10/14] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:44 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-08-26 13:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-08-28 17:52 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83fe187e-e3e8-4328-bbbf-a6751873b9e0@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
--cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
--cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
--cc=nzzhao@126.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
--cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®