From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] lockdep: Annotate read/write states
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:26:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303143991.7181.38.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110417095507.026186002@chello.nl>
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 11:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Currently the read/write status of a lock while it's acquired is denoted by a
> monotonically increasing variable where:
>
> 0 - WRITE
> 1 - READ
> 2 - RECURSIVE READ
>
> In this patch, we propose to modify this distinction from a monotonically
> increasing variable to a bit mask where:
>
> 0x1 - WRITE
> 0x2 - READ
> 0x4 - RECURSIVE READ
>
> /*
> @@ -286,6 +287,15 @@ extern void lockdep_init_map(struct lock
>
> #define lockdep_set_novalidate_class(lock) \
> lockdep_set_class(lock, &__lockdep_no_validate__)
> +
> +/* lock_state bits */
> +#define _W_ 0
> +#define _R_ (_W_ + 1)
> +#define _RR_ (_W_ + 2)
> +#define _FIRST_RR_ (_W_ + 3)
Eek!!! Please comment these. I hate trying to figure out what RR means.
If I did not read the change log, my first thought was "Round Robin".
Adding something like:
/*
* lock_state bits:
* WRITE
* READ
* RECURSIVE_READ
* FIRST RECURSIVE_READ
*/
Above that would help tremendously. This code is obfuscated enough, we
need many more comments. (I plan on sending out patches to do this too).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-18 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-17 9:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep: Support recurise-read locks Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] lockdep: Implement extra recursive-read lock tests Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] lockdep: Remove redundant read checks Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] lockdep: Annotate read/write states Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 13:34 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-18 16:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-04-18 16:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] lockdep: Seperate lock ids for read/write acquires Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 17:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 22:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] lockdep: Rename lock_list::class Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] lockdep: Maintain rw_state entries in locklist Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 13:37 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-17 9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: Consider the rw_state of lock while validating the chain Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 3:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep: Support recurise-read locks Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22 7:19 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22 7:27 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22 7:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22 8:01 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22 8:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22 8:59 ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22 9:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-23 12:33 ` [PATCH] lockdep: ignore cached chain key for recursive read Yong Zhang
2011-04-23 13:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303143991.7181.38.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®