mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] lockdep: Seperate lock ids for read/write acquires
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:33:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303148002.7181.47.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303145378.32491.889.camel@twins>

On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 18:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 12:46 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>  
> > >  void lockdep_off(void)
> > > @@ -1988,6 +1988,9 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_
> > >               if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(id >= MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS))
> > >                       return;
> > >  
> > > +             if (is_read(hlock->rw_state))
> > > +                     id += MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS;
> > 
> > Again, isn't this about recursive reads? Or am I just confused ;) 
> 
> So what we do here is split off the write chain, the above could have
> been writeen if (!is_write()) to clarify that.

Or just add a comment ;)

-- Steve

> 
> Everything except recursive read validation will traverse both chains,
> the recursive read validation will only traverse the write chains and
> ignore the combined read/recursive-read chain.



  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-18 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-17  9:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep: Support recurise-read locks Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] lockdep: Implement extra recursive-read lock tests Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] lockdep: Remove redundant read checks Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 14:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-17  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] lockdep: Annotate read/write states Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 13:34   ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-18 16:34     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:31   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-17  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] lockdep: Seperate lock ids for read/write acquires Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:46   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 16:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 17:33       ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-04-18 22:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] lockdep: Rename lock_list::class Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-17  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] lockdep: Maintain rw_state entries in locklist Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 13:37   ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-17  9:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: Consider the rw_state of lock while validating the chain Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18  3:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep: Support recurise-read locks Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22  7:19   ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22  7:27     ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22  7:44     ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22  8:01       ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22  8:31         ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-22  8:59           ` Yong Zhang
2011-04-22  9:19             ` Tetsuo Handa
2011-04-23 12:33               ` [PATCH] lockdep: ignore cached chain key for recursive read Yong Zhang
2011-04-23 13:04                 ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1303148002.7181.47.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®