From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>
Cc: "olof@lixom.net" <olof@lixom.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: rfkill: add generic gpio rfkill driver
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:40:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305225648.3461.37.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305224592.10961.10.camel@rklein-linux2>
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:23 -0700, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> > Are you sure starting out with UNSPECIFIED works? Then you'll always
> > change, but if the clock was enabled already you still enable it on the
> > first set_block() from rfkill, which still has the refcount problem, no?
> > It seems to me that the original state has to be passed in from the
> > platform?
> I thought about that. But I decided the clock that it is possible to
> have the clock used for the radio used for something else right?
Sure.
> in
> which case, the driver will leave the clk in whatever state it initially
> finds it. I.e. if the clock is disabled, then it will enable it only
> once and work, if it is enabled, it will add a refcount (only once) and
> then work and disable it again only once. It never changes the refcount
> in either direction by more than 1, and this way the initial setting of
> the clock is irrelevant. The board files can simply initialize the block
> as off if that is the initial clk state they want.
The issue is that depending on how you boot, the first refcount change
might be +1 or it might be -1.
If rfkill decides that at the time of loading wifi should be off, then
the first change would be -1, and after that it would flip between 0 and
-1.
If, on the other hand, rfkill decides that at the time of loading the
driver wifi should be on, then the first change would be +1 and it'll
flip between 0 and +1.
This seems like it'll cause issues at some point, so I think you should
either allow the driver to set the initial state or hardcode one of
these possibilities (so at least it's predictable)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-12 0:21 Rhyland Klein
2011-05-12 8:31 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-12 18:23 ` Rhyland Klein
2011-05-12 18:40 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2011-05-12 18:52 ` Rhyland Klein
2011-05-12 19:02 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-12 21:23 ` Rhyland Klein
2011-05-13 7:15 ` Johannes Berg
2011-05-13 19:02 ` Rhyland Klein
2011-05-13 19:20 ` John W. Linville
2011-05-13 20:11 ` John W. Linville
2011-05-16 18:13 ` wireless-next-2.6 rebased -- " John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305225648.3461.37.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rklein@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome