mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, patches@linaro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/28] rcu: Restore checks for blocking in RCU read-side critical sections
Date: Wed,  8 Jun 2011 12:29:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307561407-13809-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110608192943.GA13211@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Long ago, using TREE_RCU with PREEMPT would result in "scheduling
while atomic" diagnostics if you blocked in an RCU read-side critical
section.  However, PREEMPT now implies TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, which defeats
this diagnostic.  This commit therefore adds a replacement diagnostic
based on PROVE_RCU.

Because rcu_lockdep_assert() and lockdep_rcu_dereference() are now being
used for things that have nothing to do with rcu_dereference(), rename
lockdep_rcu_dereference() to lockdep_rcu_suspicious() and add a third
argument that is a string indicating what is suspicious.  This third
argument is passed in from a new third argument to rcu_lockdep_assert().
Update all calls to rcu_lockdep_assert() to add an informative third
argument.

Finally, add a pair of rcu_lockdep_assert() calls from within
rcu_note_context_switch(), one complaining if a context switch occurs
in an RCU-bh read-side critical section and another complaining if a
context switch occurs in an RCU-sched read-side critical section.
These are present only if the PROVE_RCU kernel parameter is enabled.

Again, you must enable PROVE_RCU to see these new diagnostics.  But you
are enabling PROVE_RCU to check out new RCU uses in any case, aren't you?

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h  |    2 +-
 include/linux/rcupdate.h |   28 ++++++++++++---
 kernel/lockdep.c         |   84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 kernel/pid.c             |    4 ++-
 kernel/sched.c           |    2 +
 5 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 4aef1dd..bfa66e7 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ do {									\
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
-extern void lockdep_rcu_dereference(const char *file, const int line);
+void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s);
 #endif
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 99f9aa7..8be0433 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -297,19 +297,31 @@ extern int rcu_my_thread_group_empty(void);
 /**
  * rcu_lockdep_assert - emit lockdep splat if specified condition not met
  * @c: condition to check
+ * @s: informative message
  */
-#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c)						\
+#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c, s)					\
 	do {								\
 		static bool __warned;					\
 		if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !__warned && !(c)) {	\
 			__warned = true;				\
-			lockdep_rcu_dereference(__FILE__, __LINE__);	\
+			lockdep_rcu_suspicious(__FILE__, __LINE__, s);	\
 		}							\
 	} while (0)
 
+#define rcu_sleep_check()						\
+	do {								\
+		rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map),	\
+				   "Illegal context switch in RCU-bh"	\
+				   " read-side critical section");	\
+		rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),	\
+				   "Illegal context switch in RCU-sched"\
+				   " read-side critical section");	\
+	} while (0)
+
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
 
-#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c) do { } while (0)
+#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c, s) do { } while (0)
+#define rcu_sleep_check() do { } while (0)
 
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
 
@@ -338,14 +350,16 @@ extern int rcu_my_thread_group_empty(void);
 #define __rcu_dereference_check(p, c, space) \
 	({ \
 		typeof(*p) *_________p1 = (typeof(*p)*__force )ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
-		rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
+		rcu_lockdep_assert(c, "suspicious rcu_dereference_check()" \
+				      " usage"); \
 		rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
 		smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
 		((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(_________p1)); \
 	})
 #define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, c, space) \
 	({ \
-		rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
+		rcu_lockdep_assert(c, "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected()" \
+				      " usage"); \
 		rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
 		((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
 	})
@@ -359,7 +373,9 @@ extern int rcu_my_thread_group_empty(void);
 #define __rcu_dereference_index_check(p, c) \
 	({ \
 		typeof(p) _________p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
-		rcu_lockdep_assert(c); \
+		rcu_lockdep_assert(c, \
+				   "suspicious rcu_dereference_index_check()" \
+				   " usage"); \
 		smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
 		(_________p1); \
 	})
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 53a6895..dbf453d 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -1067,10 +1067,11 @@ print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth,
 	if (debug_locks_silent)
 		return 0;
 
-	printk("\n=======================================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]\n");
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("======================================================\n");
+	printk("[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]\n");
 	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "-------------------------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("-------------------------------------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n",
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
 	print_lock(check_src);
@@ -1340,11 +1341,12 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
 	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
 		return 0;
 
-	printk("\n======================================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: %s-safe -> %s-unsafe lock order detected ]\n",
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("======================================================\n");
+	printk("[ INFO: %s-safe -> %s-unsafe lock order detected ]\n",
 		irqclass, irqclass);
 	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "------------------------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("------------------------------------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] is trying to acquire:\n",
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr),
 		curr->hardirq_context, hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
@@ -1546,10 +1548,11 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
 	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
 		return 0;
 
-	printk("\n=============================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]\n");
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("=============================================\n");
+	printk("[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]\n");
 	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "---------------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("---------------------------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n",
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
 	print_lock(next);
@@ -2018,10 +2021,11 @@ print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
 		return 0;
 
-	printk("\n=================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]\n");
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("=================================\n");
+	printk("[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]\n");
 	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "---------------------------------\n");
+	printk("---------------------------------\n");
 
 	printk("inconsistent {%s} -> {%s} usage.\n",
 		usage_str[prev_bit], usage_str[new_bit]);
@@ -2076,10 +2080,11 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr,
 	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
 		return 0;
 
-	printk("\n=========================================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]\n");
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("=========================================================\n");
+	printk("[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]\n");
 	print_kernel_version();
-	printk(  "---------------------------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("---------------------------------------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d just changed the state of lock:\n",
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
 	print_lock(this);
@@ -2869,9 +2874,10 @@ print_unlock_inbalance_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
 	if (debug_locks_silent)
 		return 0;
 
-	printk("\n=====================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]\n");
-	printk(  "-------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("=====================================\n");
+	printk("[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]\n");
+	printk("-------------------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d is trying to release lock (",
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
 	print_lockdep_cache(lock);
@@ -3276,9 +3282,10 @@ print_lock_contention_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
 	if (debug_locks_silent)
 		return 0;
 
-	printk("\n=================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ BUG: bad contention detected! ]\n");
-	printk(  "---------------------------------\n");
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("=================================\n");
+	printk("[ BUG: bad contention detected! ]\n");
+	printk("---------------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d is trying to contend lock (",
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
 	print_lockdep_cache(lock);
@@ -3637,9 +3644,10 @@ print_freed_lock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, const void *mem_from,
 	if (debug_locks_silent)
 		return;
 
-	printk("\n=========================\n");
-	printk(  "[ BUG: held lock freed! ]\n");
-	printk(  "-------------------------\n");
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("=========================\n");
+	printk("[ BUG: held lock freed! ]\n");
+	printk("-------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d is freeing memory %p-%p, with a lock still held there!\n",
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr), mem_from, mem_to-1);
 	print_lock(hlock);
@@ -3693,9 +3701,10 @@ static void print_held_locks_bug(struct task_struct *curr)
 	if (debug_locks_silent)
 		return;
 
-	printk("\n=====================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ BUG: lock held at task exit time! ]\n");
-	printk(  "-------------------------------------\n");
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("=====================================\n");
+	printk("[ BUG: lock held at task exit time! ]\n");
+	printk("-------------------------------------\n");
 	printk("%s/%d is exiting with locks still held!\n",
 		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
 	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
@@ -3789,16 +3798,17 @@ void lockdep_sys_exit(void)
 	if (unlikely(curr->lockdep_depth)) {
 		if (!debug_locks_off())
 			return;
-		printk("\n================================================\n");
-		printk(  "[ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]\n");
-		printk(  "------------------------------------------------\n");
+		printk("\n");
+		printk("================================================\n");
+		printk("[ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]\n");
+		printk("------------------------------------------------\n");
 		printk("%s/%d is leaving the kernel with locks still held!\n",
 				curr->comm, curr->pid);
 		lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
 	}
 }
 
-void lockdep_rcu_dereference(const char *file, const int line)
+void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s)
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = current;
 
@@ -3807,15 +3817,15 @@ void lockdep_rcu_dereference(const char *file, const int line)
 		return;
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY */
 	/* Note: the following can be executed concurrently, so be careful. */
-	printk("\n===================================================\n");
-	printk(  "[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]\n");
-	printk(  "---------------------------------------------------\n");
-	printk("%s:%d invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!\n",
-			file, line);
+	printk("\n");
+	printk("===============================\n");
+	printk("[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]\n");
+	printk("-------------------------------\n");
+	printk("%s:%d %s!\n", file, line, s);
 	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
 	printk("\nrcu_scheduler_active = %d, debug_locks = %d\n", rcu_scheduler_active, debug_locks);
 	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
 	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
 	dump_stack();
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_rcu_dereference);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_rcu_suspicious);
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index 57a8346..a7577b3 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -419,7 +419,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pid_task);
  */
 struct task_struct *find_task_by_pid_ns(pid_t nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
 {
-	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held());
+	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held(),
+			   "find_task_by_pid_ns() needs rcu_read_lock()"
+			   " protection");
 	return pid_task(find_pid_ns(nr, ns), PIDTYPE_PID);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 312f8b9..1352dbb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4021,6 +4021,7 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && !prev->exit_state))
 		__schedule_bug(prev);
+	rcu_sleep_check();
 
 	profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0));
 
@@ -8309,6 +8310,7 @@ void __might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
 #ifdef in_atomic
 	static unsigned long prev_jiffy;	/* ratelimiting */
 
+	rcu_sleep_check(); /* WARN_ON_ONCE() by default, no rate limit reqd. */
 	if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled()) ||
 	    system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING || oops_in_progress)
 		return;
-- 
1.7.3.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-08 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-08 19:29 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/28] patches queued for 3.1, first installment Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/28] rcu: Simplify curing of load woes Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-10 14:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 19:53     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/28] rcu: Use kthread_create_on_node() Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/28] rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 23:17   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
     [not found]   ` <BLU0-SMTP16E45D0FAD13ACF913B28B96620@phx.gbl>
2011-06-08 23:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-09  3:45   ` Josh Triplett
2011-06-09 14:17     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-10  7:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-06-10 19:35     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-06-08 23:28   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/28] rcu: Restore checks for blocking in RCU read-side critical sections Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 23:46     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 23:48       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/28] rcu: Move rcu_head definition to types.h Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 23:26   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
     [not found]   ` <BLU0-SMTP635E2E394E1488A2717A5B96620@phx.gbl>
2011-06-09  0:02     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-09  0:11       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
     [not found]       ` <BLU0-SMTP796363CC311D3AB84B196996650@phx.gbl>
2011-06-09 18:38         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-09 20:12           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/28] rcu: Update rcutorture documentation Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/28] Fix mismatched variable in rcutree_trace.c Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 23:23   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
     [not found]   ` <BLU0-SMTP181D8DEE03E1353C8A106396620@phx.gbl>
2011-06-09  0:03     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/28] rcu: Abstract common code for RCU grace-period-wait primitives Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/28] rcu: Catch rcutorture up to new RCU API additions Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/28] rcu: Fix RCU's NMI documentation Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 23:19   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/28] audit_tree,rcu: Convert call_rcu(__put_tree) to kfree_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/28] block,rcu: Convert call_rcu(cfq_cfqd_free) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/28] nfs,rcu: Convert call_rcu(nfs_free_delegation_callback) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-09 17:12   ` Trond Myklebust
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/28] security,rcu: Convert call_rcu(whitelist_item_free) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-09  0:39   ` James Morris
2011-06-09 18:45     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/28] scsi,rcu: Convert call_rcu(fc_rport_free_rcu) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/28] block,rcu: Convert call_rcu(disk_free_ptbl_rcu_cb) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/28] ia64,rcu: Convert call_rcu(sn_irq_info_free) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/28] jbd2,rcu: Convert call_rcu(free_devcache) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:34   ` Jan Kara
2011-06-08 19:47     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/28] md,rcu: Convert call_rcu(free_conf) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-09  2:03   ` NeilBrown
2011-06-08 19:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/28] security,rcu: Convert call_rcu(sel_netnode_free) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/28] security,rcu: Convert call_rcu(sel_netport_free) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/28] ipc,rcu: Convert call_rcu(free_un) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/28] ipc,rcu: Convert call_rcu(ipc_immediate_free) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/28] vmalloc,rcu: Convert call_rcu(rcu_free_va) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/28] vmalloc,rcu: Convert call_rcu(rcu_free_vb) " Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/28] sysctl,rcu: Convert call_rcu(free_head) to kfree Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 27/28] net,rcu: Convert call_rcu(xt_rateest_free_rcu) to kfree_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 28/28] net,rcu: Convert call_rcu(sk_filter_release_rcu) to kfree_rcu Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1307561407-13809-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome