From: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@canonical.com>
To: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
keith.busch@intel.com, axboe@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: determine the number of IO queues
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:52:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <130f490e-e173-750d-994e-c00f7c0da080@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99ab1942-9c38-695d-03dc-ea6eecb31217@gmail.com>
On 4/18/19 8:13 PM, Minwoo Im wrote:
>> Yes the IO queues number is 0's based, but driver would return error and
>> remove the nvme device as dead.
>
> IMHO, if a controller indicates an error with this set_feature command,
> then
> we need to figure out why the controller was returning the error to host.
>
> If you really want to use at least a single queue to see an alive I/O
> queue,
> controller should not return the error because as you mentioned above,
> NCQA, NSQA will be returned as 0-based. If an error is there, that could
> mean that controller may not able to provide even a single queue for I/O.
I was thinking about try to set 1 I/O queue in driver to try to probe
NVME device.
If it works, at least system can bootup to debug instead of just remove
NVME device and kernel boot hang at loading rootfs.
If you still concern this 1 I/O queue I can still set it as
*count = 0;
At least we try all count, NVME device still failed to respond.
Regards,
Aaron
>
> Thanks,
> Minwoo Im
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-17 14:12 Aaron Ma
2019-04-17 17:32 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-04-17 17:33 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-04-18 6:21 ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-18 7:25 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-04-18 12:13 ` Minwoo Im
2019-04-18 12:52 ` Aaron Ma [this message]
2019-04-18 13:33 ` Minwoo Im
2019-04-18 13:38 ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-18 13:58 ` Minwoo Im
2019-04-18 13:48 ` Keith Busch
2019-04-18 14:21 ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-25 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-26 5:27 ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-17 21:30 ` Edmund Nadolski (Microsoft)
2019-04-18 6:24 ` Aaron Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=130f490e-e173-750d-994e-c00f7c0da080@canonical.com \
--to=aaron.ma@canonical.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®