mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@canonical.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	keith.busch@intel.com, axboe@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: determine the number of IO queues
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:33:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbc19fb1-5e2e-ff39-5295-f38195fb8d7c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <130f490e-e173-750d-994e-c00f7c0da080@canonical.com>

On 4/18/19 9:52 PM, Aaron Ma wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/18/19 8:13 PM, Minwoo Im wrote:
>>> Yes the IO queues number is 0's based, but driver would return error and
>>> remove the nvme device as dead.
>>
>> IMHO, if a controller indicates an error with this set_feature command,
>> then
>> we need to figure out why the controller was returning the error to host.
>>
>> If you really want to use at least a single queue to see an alive I/O
>> queue,
>> controller should not return the error because as you mentioned above,
>> NCQA, NSQA will be returned as 0-based.  If an error is there, that could
>> mean that controller may not able to provide even a single queue for I/O.
> 
> I was thinking about try to set 1 I/O queue in driver to try to probe
> NVME device.
> If it works, at least system can bootup to debug instead of just remove
> NVME device and kernel boot hang at loading rootfs.

If the controller returns error for that command, how can we assure that
the controller would support a single I/O queue ?

> 
> If you still concern this 1 I/O queue I can still set it as
> *count = 0;
> 
> At least we try all count, NVME device still failed to respond.
> 
> Regards,
> Aaron
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Minwoo Im


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17 14:12 Aaron Ma
2019-04-17 17:32 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-04-17 17:33   ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-04-18  6:21     ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-18  7:25       ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-04-18 12:13       ` Minwoo Im
2019-04-18 12:52         ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-18 13:33           ` Minwoo Im [this message]
2019-04-18 13:38             ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-18 13:58               ` Minwoo Im
2019-04-18 13:48       ` Keith Busch
2019-04-18 14:21         ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-25 14:39           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-26  5:27             ` Aaron Ma
2019-04-17 21:30 ` Edmund Nadolski (Microsoft)
2019-04-18  6:24   ` Aaron Ma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fbc19fb1-5e2e-ff39-5295-f38195fb8d7c@gmail.com \
    --to=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=aaron.ma@canonical.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®