mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, pzijlstr@redhat.com
Cc: seakeel@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] nohz:remove nohz_cpu_mask
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:56:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311836172-10278-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> (raw)

From: Shi, Alex <alex.shi@intel.com>

The rcu didn't use this global variable now. Currently no user on it.
Since no clear usage of this variable, why not remove it? That can save
a cache-line in all cpus and reduce atomic variable sync contention.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h    |    1 -
 kernel/sched.c           |   11 -----------
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    6 ------
 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ed766ad..28da5c2 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -270,7 +270,6 @@ extern void init_idle_bootup_task(struct task_struct *idle);
 
 extern int runqueue_is_locked(int cpu);
 
-extern cpumask_var_t nohz_cpu_mask;
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ)
 extern void select_nohz_load_balancer(int stop_tick);
 extern int get_nohz_timer_target(void);
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 751a7cc..7936fb8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -5970,15 +5970,6 @@ void __cpuinit init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu)
 }
 
 /*
- * In a system that switches off the HZ timer nohz_cpu_mask
- * indicates which cpus entered this state. This is used
- * in the rcu update to wait only for active cpus. For system
- * which do not switch off the HZ timer nohz_cpu_mask should
- * always be CPU_BITS_NONE.
- */
-cpumask_var_t nohz_cpu_mask;
-
-/*
  * Increase the granularity value when there are more CPUs,
  * because with more CPUs the 'effective latency' as visible
  * to users decreases. But the relationship is not linear,
@@ -8189,8 +8180,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 	 */
 	current->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
 
-	/* Allocate the nohz_cpu_mask if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK */
-	zalloc_cpumask_var(&nohz_cpu_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask, GFP_NOWAIT);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index d5097c4..eb98e55 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(ktime_t now)
 	struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
 	ts->idle_waketime = now;
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
@@ -389,9 +388,6 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
 		else
 			expires.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
 
-		if (delta_jiffies > 1)
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
-
 		/* Skip reprogram of event if its not changed */
 		if (ts->tick_stopped && ktime_equal(expires, dev->next_event))
 			goto out;
@@ -441,7 +437,6 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
 		 * softirq.
 		 */
 		tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_get());
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
 	}
 	raise_softirq_irqoff(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
 out:
@@ -524,7 +519,6 @@ void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(void)
 	/* Update jiffies first */
 	select_nohz_load_balancer(0);
 	tick_do_update_jiffies64(now);
-	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
 	/*
-- 
1.6.3.3


             reply	other threads:[~2011-07-28  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-28  6:56 Alex Shi [this message]
2011-07-28 14:46 ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311836172-10278-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com \
    --to=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pzijlstr@redhat.com \
    --cc=seakeel@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®