mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, pzijlstr@redhat.com, seakeel@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz:remove nohz_cpu_mask
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:46:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110728144634.GB2403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311836172-10278-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:56:12PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> From: Shi, Alex <alex.shi@intel.com>
> 
> The rcu didn't use this global variable now. Currently no user on it.
> Since no clear usage of this variable, why not remove it? That can save
> a cache-line in all cpus and reduce atomic variable sync contention.

I have queued this for the moment.  If no one else takes it, I
will push it for 3.2.

							Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h    |    1 -
>  kernel/sched.c           |   11 -----------
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    6 ------
>  3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index ed766ad..28da5c2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -270,7 +270,6 @@ extern void init_idle_bootup_task(struct task_struct *idle);
> 
>  extern int runqueue_is_locked(int cpu);
> 
> -extern cpumask_var_t nohz_cpu_mask;
>  #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ)
>  extern void select_nohz_load_balancer(int stop_tick);
>  extern int get_nohz_timer_target(void);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 751a7cc..7936fb8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -5970,15 +5970,6 @@ void __cpuinit init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu)
>  }
> 
>  /*
> - * In a system that switches off the HZ timer nohz_cpu_mask
> - * indicates which cpus entered this state. This is used
> - * in the rcu update to wait only for active cpus. For system
> - * which do not switch off the HZ timer nohz_cpu_mask should
> - * always be CPU_BITS_NONE.
> - */
> -cpumask_var_t nohz_cpu_mask;
> -
> -/*
>   * Increase the granularity value when there are more CPUs,
>   * because with more CPUs the 'effective latency' as visible
>   * to users decreases. But the relationship is not linear,
> @@ -8189,8 +8180,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>  	 */
>  	current->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
> 
> -	/* Allocate the nohz_cpu_mask if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK */
> -	zalloc_cpumask_var(&nohz_cpu_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask, GFP_NOWAIT);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index d5097c4..eb98e55 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(ktime_t now)
>  	struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
>  	unsigned long flags;
> 
> -	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
>  	ts->idle_waketime = now;
> 
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
> @@ -389,9 +388,6 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
>  		else
>  			expires.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
> 
> -		if (delta_jiffies > 1)
> -			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
> -
>  		/* Skip reprogram of event if its not changed */
>  		if (ts->tick_stopped && ktime_equal(expires, dev->next_event))
>  			goto out;
> @@ -441,7 +437,6 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
>  		 * softirq.
>  		 */
>  		tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_get());
> -		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
>  	}
>  	raise_softirq_irqoff(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
>  out:
> @@ -524,7 +519,6 @@ void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(void)
>  	/* Update jiffies first */
>  	select_nohz_load_balancer(0);
>  	tick_do_update_jiffies64(now);
> -	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
> 
>  #ifndef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
>  	/*
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2011-07-28 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-28  6:56 Alex Shi
2011-07-28 14:46 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110728144634.GB2403@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pzijlstr@redhat.com \
    --cc=seakeel@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®