mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFC: dynamic debug enhancements?
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:15:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313972143.11178.55.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)

Hey Jason.

I recently went through drivers/media and updated
lots of calls to pr_<level>.

A common pattern for debugging there and elsewhere
treewide is the use of macros like:

#define dprintk(level, fmt, ...)			\
do {							\
	if (level > [some_modparam_var])		\
		pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
} while (0)

and

#define dprintk(mask, fmt, ...)				\
do {							\
	if (mask & [some_modparam_var])			\
		pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
} while (0)

It might be useful to have standardized calls
like pr_debug_level and pr_debug_mask instead
of multiple hand-rolled variants treewide.

Another common thing was the use of various
__FILE__, __func__, __LINE__ outputs.

I think __FILE__ is not particularly useful and
can reasonably be replaced by KBUILD_MODNAME.

Perhaps it would be good to have options to
enable these outputs with specific controls
for dynamic_debug uses.

Maybe something like using a define similar to
pr_fmt for what options are preselected for
various ddebug outputs like:

#define DYNAMIC_DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS 		\
	(_DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_MODNAME |		\
	 _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_FUNCNAME |		\
	 _DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_LINENO)



             reply	other threads:[~2011-08-22  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-22  0:15 Joe Perches [this message]
2011-08-23 14:23 ` Jason Baron
2011-08-24  1:00   ` Joe Perches
2011-08-29 18:21     ` Jim Cromie
2011-08-29 18:35       ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1313972143.11178.55.camel@Joe-Laptop \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®