From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFC: dynamic debug enhancements?
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:15:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313972143.11178.55.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)
Hey Jason.
I recently went through drivers/media and updated
lots of calls to pr_<level>.
A common pattern for debugging there and elsewhere
treewide is the use of macros like:
#define dprintk(level, fmt, ...) \
do { \
if (level > [some_modparam_var]) \
pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
and
#define dprintk(mask, fmt, ...) \
do { \
if (mask & [some_modparam_var]) \
pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
It might be useful to have standardized calls
like pr_debug_level and pr_debug_mask instead
of multiple hand-rolled variants treewide.
Another common thing was the use of various
__FILE__, __func__, __LINE__ outputs.
I think __FILE__ is not particularly useful and
can reasonably be replaced by KBUILD_MODNAME.
Perhaps it would be good to have options to
enable these outputs with specific controls
for dynamic_debug uses.
Maybe something like using a define similar to
pr_fmt for what options are preselected for
various ddebug outputs like:
#define DYNAMIC_DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS \
(_DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_MODNAME | \
_DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_FUNCNAME | \
_DPRINTK_FLAGS_INCL_LINENO)
next reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 0:15 Joe Perches [this message]
2011-08-23 14:23 ` Jason Baron
2011-08-24 1:00 ` Joe Perches
2011-08-29 18:21 ` Jim Cromie
2011-08-29 18:35 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313972143.11178.55.camel@Joe-Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®