From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, vgoyal@redhat.com, jgarzik@pobox.com,
davem@davemloft.net, hch@infradead.org
Cc: ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] block, sx8: kill blk_insert_request()
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:02:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319590927-15791-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319590927-15791-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
The only user left for blk_insert_request() is sx8 and it can be
trivially switched to use blk_execute_rq_nowait() - special requests
aren't included in io stat and sx8 doesn't use block layer tagging.
Switch sx8 and kill blk_insert_requeset().
This patch doesn't introduce any functional difference.
Only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
block/blk-core.c | 48 ------------------------------------------------
drivers/block/sx8.c | 12 ++++++++----
include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index f658711..a36738b 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1005,54 +1005,6 @@ static void add_acct_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
__elv_add_request(q, rq, where);
}
-/**
- * blk_insert_request - insert a special request into a request queue
- * @q: request queue where request should be inserted
- * @rq: request to be inserted
- * @at_head: insert request at head or tail of queue
- * @data: private data
- *
- * Description:
- * Many block devices need to execute commands asynchronously, so they don't
- * block the whole kernel from preemption during request execution. This is
- * accomplished normally by inserting aritficial requests tagged as
- * REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL in to the corresponding request queue, and letting them
- * be scheduled for actual execution by the request queue.
- *
- * We have the option of inserting the head or the tail of the queue.
- * Typically we use the tail for new ioctls and so forth. We use the head
- * of the queue for things like a QUEUE_FULL message from a device, or a
- * host that is unable to accept a particular command.
- */
-void blk_insert_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
- int at_head, void *data)
-{
- int where = at_head ? ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT : ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- /*
- * tell I/O scheduler that this isn't a regular read/write (ie it
- * must not attempt merges on this) and that it acts as a soft
- * barrier
- */
- rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL;
-
- rq->special = data;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
-
- /*
- * If command is tagged, release the tag
- */
- if (blk_rq_tagged(rq))
- blk_queue_end_tag(q, rq);
-
- add_acct_request(q, rq, where);
- __blk_run_queue(q);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_insert_request);
-
static void part_round_stats_single(int cpu, struct hd_struct *part,
unsigned long now)
{
diff --git a/drivers/block/sx8.c b/drivers/block/sx8.c
index b70f0fc..e7472f5 100644
--- a/drivers/block/sx8.c
+++ b/drivers/block/sx8.c
@@ -619,8 +619,10 @@ static int carm_array_info (struct carm_host *host, unsigned int array_idx)
host->state == HST_DEV_SCAN);
spin_unlock_irq(&host->lock);
- DPRINTK("blk_insert_request, tag == %u\n", idx);
- blk_insert_request(host->oob_q, crq->rq, 1, crq);
+ DPRINTK("blk_execute_rq_nowait, tag == %u\n", idx);
+ crq->rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL;
+ crq->rq->special = crq;
+ blk_execute_rq_nowait(host->oob_q, NULL, crq->rq, true, NULL);
return 0;
@@ -658,8 +660,10 @@ static int carm_send_special (struct carm_host *host, carm_sspc_t func)
BUG_ON(rc < 0);
crq->msg_bucket = (u32) rc;
- DPRINTK("blk_insert_request, tag == %u\n", idx);
- blk_insert_request(host->oob_q, crq->rq, 1, crq);
+ DPRINTK("blk_execute_rq_nowait, tag == %u\n", idx);
+ crq->rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL;
+ crq->rq->special = crq;
+ blk_execute_rq_nowait(host->oob_q, NULL, crq->rq, true, NULL);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 5267cd2..45563b0 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -660,7 +660,6 @@ extern void __blk_put_request(struct request_queue *, struct request *);
extern struct request *blk_get_request(struct request_queue *, int, gfp_t);
extern struct request *blk_make_request(struct request_queue *, struct bio *,
gfp_t);
-extern void blk_insert_request(struct request_queue *, struct request *, int, void *);
extern void blk_requeue_request(struct request_queue *, struct request *);
extern void blk_add_request_payload(struct request *rq, struct page *page,
unsigned int len);
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-26 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 1:02 [PATCHSET block:for-3.2/core] further updates to blk_cleanup_queue(), take#2 Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-10-26 1:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] block, sx8: kill blk_insert_request() Jeff Garzik
2011-10-26 8:12 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: allow blk_execute_rq_nowait() to be called from IRQ context Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 8:11 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-26 19:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] block, ide: unexport elv_add_request() Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: add blk_queue_dead() Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 8:18 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-26 17:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-26 19:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: fix drain_all condition in blk_drain_queue() Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: add missing blk_queue_dead() checks Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-21 3:56 [PATCHSET block:for-3.2/core] further updates to blk_cleanup_queue() Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 3:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] block, sx8: kill blk_insert_request() Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 4:03 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319590927-15791-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome