From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, vgoyal@redhat.com, jgarzik@pobox.com,
davem@davemloft.net, hch@infradead.org
Cc: ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] block: add missing blk_queue_dead() checks
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:02:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319590927-15791-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319590927-15791-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
blk_insert_cloned_request(), blk_execute_rq_nowait() and
blk_flush_plug_list() either didn't check whether the queue was dead
or did it without holding queue_lock. Update them so that dead state
is checked while holding queue_lock.
AFAICS, this plugs all holes (requeue doesn't matter as the request is
transitioning atomically from in_flight to queued).
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
block/blk-core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
block/blk-exec.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 4224e0a..8267409 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1722,6 +1722,10 @@ int blk_insert_cloned_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
return -EIO;
spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
+ if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
/*
* Submitting request must be dequeued before calling this function
@@ -2696,6 +2700,14 @@ static void queue_unplugged(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int depth,
trace_block_unplug(q, depth, !from_schedule);
/*
+ * Don't mess with dead queue.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
+ spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
* If we are punting this to kblockd, then we can safely drop
* the queue_lock before waking kblockd (which needs to take
* this lock).
@@ -2771,6 +2783,15 @@ void blk_flush_plug_list(struct blk_plug *plug, bool from_schedule)
depth = 0;
spin_lock(q->queue_lock);
}
+
+ /*
+ * Short-circuit if @q is dead
+ */
+ if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
+ __blk_end_request_all(rq, -ENODEV);
+ continue;
+ }
+
/*
* rq is already accounted, so use raw insert
*/
diff --git a/block/blk-exec.c b/block/blk-exec.c
index 8716557..660a722 100644
--- a/block/blk-exec.c
+++ b/block/blk-exec.c
@@ -52,7 +52,10 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
bool may_sleep = !preempt_count() && !irqs_disabled();
unsigned long flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
+
if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
rq->errors = -ENXIO;
if (rq->end_io)
rq->end_io(rq, rq->errors);
@@ -61,8 +64,6 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
rq->rq_disk = bd_disk;
rq->end_io = done;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
elv_add_request(q, rq, where);
/*
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-26 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 1:02 [PATCHSET block:for-3.2/core] further updates to blk_cleanup_queue(), take#2 Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] block, sx8: kill blk_insert_request() Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-10-26 8:12 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: allow blk_execute_rq_nowait() to be called from IRQ context Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 8:11 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-26 19:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] block, ide: unexport elv_add_request() Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: add blk_queue_dead() Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 8:18 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-26 17:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-26 19:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: fix drain_all condition in blk_drain_queue() Tejun Heo
2011-10-26 1:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-21 3:56 [PATCHSET block:for-3.2/core] further updates to blk_cleanup_queue() Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 3:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: add missing blk_queue_dead() checks Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319590927-15791-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome