mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: rjw@sisk.pl, paul@paulmenage.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, oleg@redhat.com, matthltc@us.ibm.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	wwang <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 02/17] freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:05:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320087928-32307-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320087928-32307-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Some drivers set PF_NOFREEZE in their kthread functions which is
completely unnecessary and racy - some part of freezer code doesn't
consider cases where PF_NOFREEZE is set asynchronous to freezer
operations.

In general, there's no reason to allow setting PF_NOFREEZE explicitly.
Remove them and change the documentation to note that setting
PF_NOFREEZE directly isn't allowed.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: wwang <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>
---
 Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt |    2 +-
 drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_main.c           |    2 --
 drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c                 |    3 ---
 drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c                 |    2 --
 drivers/staging/rts_pstor/rtsx.c          |    2 --
 5 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
index 38b5724..710c965 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ III. Which kernel threads are freezable?
 
 Kernel threads are not freezable by default.  However, a kernel thread may clear
 PF_NOFREEZE for itself by calling set_freezable() (the resetting of PF_NOFREEZE
-directly is strongly discouraged).  From this point it is regarded as freezable
+directly is not allowed).  From this point it is regarded as freezable
 and must call try_to_freeze() in a suitable place.
 
 IV. Why do we do that?
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_main.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_main.c
index 548d1d9..57312d4 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_main.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_main.c
@@ -473,8 +473,6 @@ static int btmrvl_service_main_thread(void *data)
 
 	init_waitqueue_entry(&wait, current);
 
-	current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
-
 	for (;;) {
 		add_wait_queue(&thread->wait_q, &wait);
 
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
index 8a7ee31..6aae831 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
@@ -289,9 +289,6 @@ static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
 	static unsigned i2c_errors;
 	static const unsigned max_i2c_errors = 100;
 
-
-	current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
-
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		int ret;
 		int module_irq;
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
index eb3b5f8..6fd7795 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c
@@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ static int twl6030_irq_thread(void *data)
 	static const unsigned max_i2c_errors = 100;
 	int ret;
 
-	current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
-
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		int i;
 		union {
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts_pstor/rtsx.c b/drivers/staging/rts_pstor/rtsx.c
index 480b0ed..8a7803c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts_pstor/rtsx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts_pstor/rtsx.c
@@ -466,8 +466,6 @@ static int rtsx_control_thread(void *__dev)
 	struct rtsx_chip *chip = dev->chip;
 	struct Scsi_Host *host = rtsx_to_host(dev);
 
-	current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
-
 	for (;;) {
 		if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&dev->cmnd_ready))
 			break;
-- 
1.7.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-31 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-31 19:05 [PATCHSET pm] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 01/17] freezer: fix current->state restoration race in refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 03/17] freezer: unexport refrigerator() and update try_to_freeze() slightly Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 04/17] freezer: implement and use kthread_freezable_should_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 05/17] freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation Tejun Heo
2011-11-06 12:04   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-06 16:51     ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-06 17:10       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 06/17] freezer: remove racy clear_freeze_flag() and set PF_NOFREEZE on dead tasks Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 07/17] freezer: don't distinguish nosig tasks on thaw Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 08/17] freezer: use dedicated lock instead of task_lock() + memory barrier Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 09/17] freezer: make freezing indicate freeze condition in effect Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 10/17] freezer: test freezable conditions while holding freezer_lock Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 11/17] freezer: kill PF_FREEZING Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 12/17] freezer: clean up freeze_processes() failure path Tejun Heo
2011-11-03 19:09   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-03 22:25   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 13/17] cgroup_freezer: prepare for removal of TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:33   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 14/17] freezer: make freezing() test freeze conditions in effect instead " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:34   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 15/17] freezer: remove now unused TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 16/17] freezer: remove should_send_signal() and update frozen() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 17/17] freezer: fix set_freezable[_with_signal]() race Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:34 ` [PATCH 18/17] freezer: restructure __refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 19/17] freezer: use lock_task_sighand() in fake_signal_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:35 ` [PATCH UPDATED 20/17] freezer: remove unused @sig_only from freeze_task() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:40 ` [PATCHSET UPDATED pm] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation, take#2 Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1320087928-32307-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome