mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, paul@paulmenage.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, oleg@redhat.com,
	matthltc@us.ibm.com, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 17:34:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB677CB.20608@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320087928-32307-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

On 11/01/2011 12:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> thaw_process() now has only internal users - system and cgroup
> freezers.  Remove the unnecessary return value, rename, unexport and
> collapse __thaw_process() into it.  This will help further updates to
> the freezer code.
> 
> -v2: minor style update as suggested by Matt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/freezer.h |    3 +--
>  kernel/cgroup_freezer.c |    7 +++----
>  kernel/freezer.c        |   31 ++++++++++++-------------------
>  kernel/power/process.c  |    2 +-
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/freezer.h b/include/linux/freezer.h
> index 4a73dd2..253bcfe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/freezer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/freezer.h
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline bool should_send_signal(struct task_struct *p)
>  }
> 
>  /* Takes and releases task alloc lock using task_lock() */
> -extern int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p);
> +extern void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *t);
> 
>  extern bool __refrigerator(bool check_kthr_stop);
>  extern int freeze_processes(void);
> @@ -183,7 +183,6 @@ static inline int frozen(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
>  static inline int freezing(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
>  static inline void set_freeze_flag(struct task_struct *p) {}
>  static inline void clear_freeze_flag(struct task_struct *p) {}
> -static inline int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p) { return 1; }
> 
>  static inline bool __refrigerator(bool check_kthr_stop) { return false; }
>  static inline int freeze_processes(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> index e691818..e7fa0ec 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys freezer_subsys;
>   *   write_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
>   *    task->alloc_lock
>   *   read_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
> - *    task->alloc_lock (inside thaw_process(), prevents race with refrigerator())
> + *    task->alloc_lock (inside __thaw_task(), prevents race with refrigerator())
                                                                   ^^^^^^^^^
                                              Shouldn't this be __refrigerator()?

>   *     sighand->siglock
>   */
>  static struct cgroup_subsys_state *freezer_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> @@ -300,9 +300,8 @@ static void unfreeze_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct freezer *freezer)
>  	struct task_struct *task;
> 
>  	cgroup_iter_start(cgroup, &it);
> -	while ((task = cgroup_iter_next(cgroup, &it))) {
> -		thaw_process(task);
> -	}
> +	while ((task = cgroup_iter_next(cgroup, &it)))
> +		__thaw_task(task);
>  	cgroup_iter_end(cgroup, &it);
> 
>  	freezer->state = CGROUP_THAWED;
> diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
> index 57ba75f..8faa0e0 100644
> --- a/kernel/freezer.c
> +++ b/kernel/freezer.c
> @@ -145,18 +145,8 @@ void cancel_freezing(struct task_struct *p)
>  	}
>  }
> 
> -static int __thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
> -{
> -	if (frozen(p)) {
> -		p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN;
> -		return 1;
> -	}
> -	clear_freeze_flag(p);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  /*
> - * Wake up a frozen process
> + * Wake up a frozen task
>   *
>   * task_lock() is needed to prevent the race with refrigerator() which may
                                                     ^^^^^^
                                                __refrigerator()?

>   * occur if the freezing of tasks fails.  Namely, without the lock, if the
> @@ -164,15 +154,18 @@ static int __thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
>   * refrigerator() could call frozen_process(), in which case the task would be
>   * frozen and no one would thaw it.
>   */
> -int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
> +void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> +	bool was_frozen;
> +
>  	task_lock(p);
> -	if (__thaw_process(p) == 1) {
> -		task_unlock(p);
> -		wake_up_process(p);
> -		return 1;
> -	}
> +	was_frozen = frozen(p);
> +	if (was_frozen)
> +		p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN;
> +	else
> +		clear_freeze_flag(p);
>  	task_unlock(p);
> -	return 0;
> +
> +	if (was_frozen)
> +		wake_up_process(p);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_process);
> diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> index addbbe5..fe27872 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void thaw_tasks(bool nosig_only)
>  		if (cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(p))
>  			continue;
> 
> -		thaw_process(p);
> +		__thaw_task(p);
>  	} while_each_thread(g, p);
>  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
>  }

Rebasing to latest kernel, we need to do the conversion in mm/oom_kill.c as well,
(and consequently add __thaw_task() empty function under !CONFIG_FREEZER, in
include/linux/freezer.h)

Thanks,
Srivatsa S. Bhat


  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-06 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-31 19:05 [PATCHSET pm] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 01/17] freezer: fix current->state restoration race in refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 02/17] freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 03/17] freezer: unexport refrigerator() and update try_to_freeze() slightly Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 04/17] freezer: implement and use kthread_freezable_should_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 05/17] freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation Tejun Heo
2011-11-06 12:04   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2011-11-06 16:51     ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-06 17:10       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 06/17] freezer: remove racy clear_freeze_flag() and set PF_NOFREEZE on dead tasks Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 07/17] freezer: don't distinguish nosig tasks on thaw Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 08/17] freezer: use dedicated lock instead of task_lock() + memory barrier Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 09/17] freezer: make freezing indicate freeze condition in effect Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 10/17] freezer: test freezable conditions while holding freezer_lock Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 11/17] freezer: kill PF_FREEZING Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 12/17] freezer: clean up freeze_processes() failure path Tejun Heo
2011-11-03 19:09   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-03 22:25   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 13/17] cgroup_freezer: prepare for removal of TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:33   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 14/17] freezer: make freezing() test freeze conditions in effect instead " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:34   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 15/17] freezer: remove now unused TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 16/17] freezer: remove should_send_signal() and update frozen() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 17/17] freezer: fix set_freezable[_with_signal]() race Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:34 ` [PATCH 18/17] freezer: restructure __refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 19/17] freezer: use lock_task_sighand() in fake_signal_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:35 ` [PATCH UPDATED 20/17] freezer: remove unused @sig_only from freeze_task() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:40 ` [PATCHSET UPDATED pm] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation, take#2 Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EB677CB.20608@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome