From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, paul@paulmenage.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, oleg@redhat.com,
matthltc@us.ibm.com, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 17:34:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB677CB.20608@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320087928-32307-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On 11/01/2011 12:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> thaw_process() now has only internal users - system and cgroup
> freezers. Remove the unnecessary return value, rename, unexport and
> collapse __thaw_process() into it. This will help further updates to
> the freezer code.
>
> -v2: minor style update as suggested by Matt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/freezer.h | 3 +--
> kernel/cgroup_freezer.c | 7 +++----
> kernel/freezer.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
> kernel/power/process.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/freezer.h b/include/linux/freezer.h
> index 4a73dd2..253bcfe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/freezer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/freezer.h
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline bool should_send_signal(struct task_struct *p)
> }
>
> /* Takes and releases task alloc lock using task_lock() */
> -extern int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p);
> +extern void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *t);
>
> extern bool __refrigerator(bool check_kthr_stop);
> extern int freeze_processes(void);
> @@ -183,7 +183,6 @@ static inline int frozen(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
> static inline int freezing(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
> static inline void set_freeze_flag(struct task_struct *p) {}
> static inline void clear_freeze_flag(struct task_struct *p) {}
> -static inline int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p) { return 1; }
>
> static inline bool __refrigerator(bool check_kthr_stop) { return false; }
> static inline int freeze_processes(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> index e691818..e7fa0ec 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys freezer_subsys;
> * write_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
> * task->alloc_lock
> * read_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
> - * task->alloc_lock (inside thaw_process(), prevents race with refrigerator())
> + * task->alloc_lock (inside __thaw_task(), prevents race with refrigerator())
^^^^^^^^^
Shouldn't this be __refrigerator()?
> * sighand->siglock
> */
> static struct cgroup_subsys_state *freezer_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> @@ -300,9 +300,8 @@ static void unfreeze_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct freezer *freezer)
> struct task_struct *task;
>
> cgroup_iter_start(cgroup, &it);
> - while ((task = cgroup_iter_next(cgroup, &it))) {
> - thaw_process(task);
> - }
> + while ((task = cgroup_iter_next(cgroup, &it)))
> + __thaw_task(task);
> cgroup_iter_end(cgroup, &it);
>
> freezer->state = CGROUP_THAWED;
> diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
> index 57ba75f..8faa0e0 100644
> --- a/kernel/freezer.c
> +++ b/kernel/freezer.c
> @@ -145,18 +145,8 @@ void cancel_freezing(struct task_struct *p)
> }
> }
>
> -static int __thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
> -{
> - if (frozen(p)) {
> - p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN;
> - return 1;
> - }
> - clear_freeze_flag(p);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /*
> - * Wake up a frozen process
> + * Wake up a frozen task
> *
> * task_lock() is needed to prevent the race with refrigerator() which may
^^^^^^
__refrigerator()?
> * occur if the freezing of tasks fails. Namely, without the lock, if the
> @@ -164,15 +154,18 @@ static int __thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
> * refrigerator() could call frozen_process(), in which case the task would be
> * frozen and no one would thaw it.
> */
> -int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
> +void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> + bool was_frozen;
> +
> task_lock(p);
> - if (__thaw_process(p) == 1) {
> - task_unlock(p);
> - wake_up_process(p);
> - return 1;
> - }
> + was_frozen = frozen(p);
> + if (was_frozen)
> + p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN;
> + else
> + clear_freeze_flag(p);
> task_unlock(p);
> - return 0;
> +
> + if (was_frozen)
> + wake_up_process(p);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_process);
> diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> index addbbe5..fe27872 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void thaw_tasks(bool nosig_only)
> if (cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(p))
> continue;
>
> - thaw_process(p);
> + __thaw_task(p);
> } while_each_thread(g, p);
> read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> }
Rebasing to latest kernel, we need to do the conversion in mm/oom_kill.c as well,
(and consequently add __thaw_task() empty function under !CONFIG_FREEZER, in
include/linux/freezer.h)
Thanks,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-06 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-31 19:05 [PATCHSET pm] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation, take#2 Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 01/17] freezer: fix current->state restoration race in refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 02/17] freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 03/17] freezer: unexport refrigerator() and update try_to_freeze() slightly Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 04/17] freezer: implement and use kthread_freezable_should_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 05/17] freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation Tejun Heo
2011-11-06 12:04 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2011-11-06 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-06 17:10 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 06/17] freezer: remove racy clear_freeze_flag() and set PF_NOFREEZE on dead tasks Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 07/17] freezer: don't distinguish nosig tasks on thaw Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 08/17] freezer: use dedicated lock instead of task_lock() + memory barrier Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 09/17] freezer: make freezing indicate freeze condition in effect Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 10/17] freezer: test freezable conditions while holding freezer_lock Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 11/17] freezer: kill PF_FREEZING Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 12/17] freezer: clean up freeze_processes() failure path Tejun Heo
2011-11-03 19:09 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-03 22:25 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 13/17] cgroup_freezer: prepare for removal of TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:33 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 14/17] freezer: make freezing() test freeze conditions in effect instead " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:34 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 15/17] freezer: remove now unused TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 16/17] freezer: remove should_send_signal() and update frozen() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 19:05 ` [PATCH 17/17] freezer: fix set_freezable[_with_signal]() race Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:34 ` [PATCH 18/17] freezer: restructure __refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:35 ` [PATCH 19/17] freezer: use lock_task_sighand() in fake_signal_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:35 ` [PATCH UPDATED 20/17] freezer: remove unused @sig_only from freeze_task() Tejun Heo
2011-10-31 22:40 ` [PATCHSET UPDATED pm] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation, take#2 Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB677CB.20608@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome