From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>,
"Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] drop unused Kconfig symbols
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:46:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320140764.14409.135.camel@x61.thuisdomein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111101085930.GF26898@axis.com>
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 09:59 +0100, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:55:16PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Just today Jesper Nilsson basically dropped that NAK. I assume Jesper
> > will try to carry the patch in (one of) their tree(s). Is that correct?
>
> The patch that reintroduces the Kconfigs, yes, the one that removes them, no.
But yesterday you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:11:01PM +0200, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
[...]
> > (Personally, I'm tending towards unless it's going to be in linux-next within
> > the next month or so, pull the Kconfig variables out and the driver can re-add
> > them when it actually lands)
>
> Ok, let's do it the right way and remove them now, and I can re-add
> them in the same tree.
So your plans have changed? It's OK with me if they change, of course,
but now I'm unsure what you intend to do.
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-01 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1319456255.2409.30.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
2011-10-31 22:42 ` Michal Marek
2011-10-31 22:55 ` Paul Bolle
2011-11-01 8:59 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-11-01 9:46 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2011-11-01 10:12 ` Jesper Nilsson
2011-11-01 10:35 ` Paul Bolle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320140764.14409.135.camel@x61.thuisdomein \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=starvik@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®