mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.jf.intel.com>,
	"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v3 5/6] sched, ttwu_queue: queue remote wakeups only when crossing cache domains
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 07:06:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323324388.5118.16.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323285644.1984.55.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>

On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 11:20 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 08:23 -0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > In fact, Ingo (rightfully) refused to take this due to the x86 specific
> > code in scheduler guts..
> 
> I noticed this while reviewing/testing the patch and left it because on
> the microbenchmark, it had measurable impact of using the direct check
> as compared to going through the scheduler domains every time to figure
> out if we shared the LLC or not.
> 
> > Initially the idea was to provide a new arch interface and a fallback
> > and do the Kconfig thing etc. After a bit of thought I decided against
> > that for we already have that information in the sched_domain tree
> > anyway and it should be a simple matter of representing things
> > differently.
> 
> This def looks better.

Yup.

> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_top_spr_id);
> 
> pkg_srid (shared resource id)?
> 
> > +
> > +static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +	struct sched_domain *sd;
> > +	int id = -1;
> > +
> > +	sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
> > +	if (sd)
> > +		id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd));
> 
> if there is no sd with shared pkg resources, then id has to be set to
> 'cpu'.
> 
> > +	rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_top_spr, cpu), sd);
> > +	per_cpu(sd_top_spr_id, cpu) = id;
> 
> Otherwise it looks good.
> 
> Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>

Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>

The stable regression fix should look about like so then, yes?

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

sched, ttwu_queue: queue remote wakeups only when crossing cache domains

<Insert Peter's final changelog>

Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.0+

---
 kernel/sched.c |   51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-3.0/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.0.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-3.0/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2636,6 +2636,19 @@ static int ttwu_activate_remote(struct t
 
 }
 #endif /* __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW */
+
+/*
+ * Keep a unique ID per domain (we use the first cpu number in
+ * the cpumask of the domain), this allows us to quickly tell if
+ * two cpus are in the same cache domain, see ttwu_share_cache().
+ */
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_top_spr_id);
+
+static inline int ttwu_share_cache(int this_cpu, int that_cpu)
+{
+	return per_cpu(sd_top_spr_id, this_cpu) ==
+		per_cpu(sd_top_spr_id, that_cpu);
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
@@ -2643,7 +2656,7 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struc
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
-	if (sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE) && cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
+	if (sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE) && !ttwu_share_cache(smp_processor_id(), cpu)) {
 		sched_clock_cpu(cpu); /* sync clocks x-cpu */
 		ttwu_queue_remote(p, cpu);
 		return;
@@ -6858,6 +6871,40 @@ static void destroy_sched_domains(struct
 		destroy_sched_domain(sd, cpu);
 }
 
+/**
+ * highest_flag_domain - Return highest sched_domain containing flag.
+ * @cpu:	The cpu whose highest level of sched domain is to
+ *		be returned.
+ * @flag:	The flag to check for the highest sched_domain
+ *		for the given cpu.
+ *
+ * Returns the highest sched_domain of a cpu which contains the given flag.
+ */
+static inline struct sched_domain *highest_flag_domain(int cpu, int flag)
+{
+	struct sched_domain *sd, *hsd = NULL;
+
+	for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
+		if (!(sd->flags & flag))
+			break;
+		hsd = sd;
+	}
+
+	return hsd;
+}
+
+static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
+{
+	struct sched_domain *sd;
+	int id = cpu;
+
+	sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
+	if (sd)
+		id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd));
+
+	per_cpu(sd_top_spr_id, cpu) = id;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach the domain 'sd' to 'cpu' as its base domain. Callers must
  * hold the hotplug lock.
@@ -6897,6 +6944,8 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s
 	tmp = rq->sd;
 	rcu_assign_pointer(rq->sd, sd);
 	destroy_sched_domains(tmp, cpu);
+
+	update_top_cache_domain(cpu);
 }
 
 /* cpus with isolated domains */




  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-08  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-02  1:07 [patch v3 0/6] nohz idle load balancing patches Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02  1:07 ` [patch v3 1/6] sched, nohz: introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06  9:53   ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Introduce nohz_flags in 'struct rq' tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 12:14   ` [patch v3 1/6] sched, nohz: introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-12-06 19:26     ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 19:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 20:24       ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Set the NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK flag for idle load balancer tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02  1:07 ` [patch v3 2/6] sched, nohz: track nr_busy_cpus in the sched_group_power Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06  9:54   ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Track " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02  1:07 ` [patch v3 3/6] sched, nohz: sched group, domain aware nohz idle load balancing Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06  6:37   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-12-06 19:19     ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 20:24       ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Fix the idle cpu check in nohz_idle_balance tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
     [not found]     ` <A75BCAD09CE00A4280CDD4429D85F1F9261B42A1F9@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
2011-12-06 19:27       ` [patch v3 3/6] sched, nohz: sched group, domain aware nohz idle load balancing Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06  9:54   ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Implement " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02  1:07 ` [patch v3 4/6] sched, nohz: cleanup the find_new_ilb() using sched groups nr_busy_cpus Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06  9:55   ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Clean up " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02  1:07 ` [patch v3 5/6] sched, ttwu_queue: queue remote wakeups only when crossing cache domains Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02  3:34   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-12-07 16:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-07 19:20       ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-08  6:06         ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-12-08  9:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08  9:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 19:34           ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-08 21:50             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 21:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 10:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-21 11:41           ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Only queue remote wakeups when crossing cache boundaries tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-02  1:07 ` [patch v3 6/6] sched: fix the sched group node allocation for SD_OVERLAP domain Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1323324388.5118.16.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.jf.intel.com \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome