From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.jf.intel.com>,
alex.shi@intel.com, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: [patch v3 4/6] sched, nohz: cleanup the find_new_ilb() using sched groups nr_busy_cpus
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:07:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111202010832.656983582@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111202010731.344451602@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: cleanup_find_ilb.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3258 bytes --]
nr_busy_cpus in the sched_group_power indicates whether the group
is semi idle or not. This helps remove the is_semi_idle_group() and simplify
the find_new_ilb() in the context of finding an optimal cpu that can do
idle load balancing.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 48 ++++++++++++------------------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Index: tip/kernel/sched/fair.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4710,7 +4710,6 @@ out_unlock:
*/
static struct {
cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
- cpumask_var_t grp_idle_mask;
atomic_t nr_cpus;
unsigned long next_balance; /* in jiffy units */
} nohz ____cacheline_aligned;
@@ -4751,33 +4750,6 @@ static inline struct sched_domain *lowes
(sd && (sd->flags & flag)); sd = sd->parent)
/**
- * is_semi_idle_group - Checks if the given sched_group is semi-idle.
- * @ilb_group: group to be checked for semi-idleness
- *
- * Returns: 1 if the group is semi-idle. 0 otherwise.
- *
- * We define a sched_group to be semi idle if it has atleast one idle-CPU
- * and atleast one non-idle CPU. This helper function checks if the given
- * sched_group is semi-idle or not.
- */
-static inline int is_semi_idle_group(struct sched_group *ilb_group)
-{
- cpumask_and(nohz.grp_idle_mask, nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
- sched_group_cpus(ilb_group));
-
- /*
- * A sched_group is semi-idle when it has atleast one busy cpu
- * and atleast one idle cpu.
- */
- if (cpumask_empty(nohz.grp_idle_mask))
- return 0;
-
- if (cpumask_equal(nohz.grp_idle_mask, sched_group_cpus(ilb_group)))
- return 0;
-
- return 1;
-}
-/**
* find_new_ilb - Finds the optimum idle load balancer for nomination.
* @cpu: The cpu which is nominating a new idle_load_balancer.
*
@@ -4792,8 +4764,8 @@ static inline int is_semi_idle_group(str
static int find_new_ilb(int cpu)
{
int ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
+ struct sched_group *ilbg;
struct sched_domain *sd;
- struct sched_group *ilb_group;
/*
* Have idle load balancer selection from semi-idle packages only
@@ -4811,23 +4783,28 @@ static int find_new_ilb(int cpu)
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_flag_domain(cpu, sd, SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE) {
- ilb_group = sd->groups;
+ ilbg = sd->groups;
do {
- if (is_semi_idle_group(ilb_group)) {
- ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.grp_idle_mask);
+ if (ilbg->group_weight !=
+ atomic_read(&ilbg->sgp->nr_busy_cpus)) {
+ ilb = cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
+ sched_group_cpus(ilbg));
goto unlock;
}
- ilb_group = ilb_group->next;
+ ilbg = ilbg->next;
- } while (ilb_group != sd->groups);
+ } while (ilbg != sd->groups);
}
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
out_done:
- return ilb;
+ if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb))
+ return ilb;
+
+ return nr_cpu_ids;
}
#else /* (CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) */
static inline int find_new_ilb(int call_cpu)
@@ -5565,7 +5542,6 @@ __init void init_sched_fair_class(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
zalloc_cpumask_var(&nohz.idle_cpus_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
- alloc_cpumask_var(&nohz.grp_idle_mask, GFP_NOWAIT);
#endif
#endif /* SMP */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-02 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-02 1:07 [patch v3 0/6] nohz idle load balancing patches Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02 1:07 ` [patch v3 1/6] sched, nohz: introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 9:53 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Introduce nohz_flags in 'struct rq' tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 12:14 ` [patch v3 1/6] sched, nohz: introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-12-06 19:26 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 19:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 20:24 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Set the NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK flag for idle load balancer tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02 1:07 ` [patch v3 2/6] sched, nohz: track nr_busy_cpus in the sched_group_power Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 9:54 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Track " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02 1:07 ` [patch v3 3/6] sched, nohz: sched group, domain aware nohz idle load balancing Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 6:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-12-06 19:19 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 20:24 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Fix the idle cpu check in nohz_idle_balance tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
[not found] ` <A75BCAD09CE00A4280CDD4429D85F1F9261B42A1F9@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
2011-12-06 19:27 ` [patch v3 3/6] sched, nohz: sched group, domain aware nohz idle load balancing Suresh Siddha
2011-12-06 9:54 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Implement " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02 1:07 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2011-12-06 9:55 ` [tip:sched/core] sched, nohz: Clean up the find_new_ilb() using sched groups nr_busy_cpus tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02 1:07 ` [patch v3 5/6] sched, ttwu_queue: queue remote wakeups only when crossing cache domains Suresh Siddha
2011-12-02 3:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-12-07 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-07 19:20 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-08 6:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-12-08 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 19:34 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-12-08 21:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 21:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-21 11:41 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Only queue remote wakeups when crossing cache boundaries tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-02 1:07 ` [patch v3 6/6] sched: fix the sched group node allocation for SD_OVERLAP domain Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111202010832.656983582@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®