mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFSv4: Return the delegation if the server returns NFS4ERR_OPENMODE
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:50:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1331239814.11759.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120308204205.GB9273@fieldses.org>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1960 bytes --]

On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 15:42 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:23:34PM -0500, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Myklebust, Trond
> > <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 12:52 -0500, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > >> wouldn't it be better for you to proactively return a read delegation
> > >> then unnecessarily erroring?
> > >
> > > If nobody else holds a delegation, then the NFS client is actually
> > > allowed to keep its read delegation while writing to the file. It does
> > > admittedly need to request an OPEN stateid for write in that case...
> > > (See section 10.4 of RFC3530bis draft 16)
> > 
> > If we both agree that there has to be a request for an open stateid for
> > a write, then instead of returning the read delegation if the client receives
> > err_openmode (when it send the request with read delegation stateid
> > as you said per 3560bis), can't the client resend the setattr with the open
> > stateid? The ordering of the stateid usage is a "should" and not a "must".
> > 
> > In rfc5661, it really doesn't make sense to ever send a setattr with
> > a read delegation stateid. According to 9.1.2, the server "MUST" return
> > err_open_mode" error in that case.
> > 
> > I gather you are in this case dealing with 4.0 delegations. But I wonder
> > if you'll do something else for 4.1 delegation then?
> 
> 3530bis has the same language ("...must verify that the access mode
> allows writing and return an NFS4ERR_OPENMODE error if it does not").

OK, so we shouldn't send the delegation stateid either for v4 or v4.1.
However should we pre-emptively return the delegation? I've been
assuming not.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com

ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-08 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-06 10:10 NFSv4: truncate returns I/O error Miklos Szeredi
2012-03-06 14:16 ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-07 22:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Trond Myklebust
2012-03-07 22:40   ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS: Properly handle the case where the delegation is revoked Trond Myklebust
2012-03-07 22:40     ` [PATCH 2/2] NFSv4: Return the delegation if the server returns NFS4ERR_OPENMODE Trond Myklebust
2012-03-08 17:52       ` Olga Kornievskaia
2012-03-08 18:15         ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-08 20:23           ` Olga Kornievskaia
2012-03-08 20:42             ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-08 20:50               ` Myklebust, Trond [this message]
2012-03-08 20:57                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-08 21:02                   ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-03-08 21:09                     ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-03-08 21:12                   ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-03-08 21:27                 ` Olga Kornievskaia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1331239814.11759.1.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=aglo@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®