From: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] arch/unicore32/kernel/dma.c: ensure arguments to request_irq and free_irq are compatible
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:01:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1331773284.2389.61.camel@epip-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1203140957020.2146@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:23 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Guan Xuetao wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 11:19 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:07:24PM +0800, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> >>> puv3_init_dma() is called ONCE when initializing.
> >>> In logical, if request_irq(IRQ_DMAERR, *) failed, free_irq(IRQ_DMA, *)
> >>> is unnecessary, and dma device/driver can keep on working.
> >>> The patch could be:
> >>> ret = request_irq(IRQ_DMAERR, dma_err_handler, 0, "DMAERR", NULL);
> >>> if (ret) {
> >>> printk(KERN_CRIT "Can't register IRQ for DMAERR\n");
> >>> - free_irq(IRQ_DMA, "DMA");
> >>> return ret;
> >>> }
> >>
> >> It seems like you should remove the error return as well?
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> dan carpenter
> >>
> > The error return value will only generate an extra warning message, and
> > have no side-effect.
>
> The whole thing seems a little strange. I guess your point is that the
> call site never looks at the return value? Wouldn't it be better to make
> there be no return value in that case? If there is a return value, some
> calling context in the future might take that into account and then the
> lack of a free_irq would be a memory leak. Also if the first request_irq
> can never fail, perhaps that should be made explicit by not testing the
> return value?
>
> julia
This function is an init_call, not a probe function, and it is only
called ONCE.
The dma device here has two interrupts, one IRQ_DMA, another IRQ_DMAERR.
And the device could work without IRQ_DMAERR.
The return value should indicate whether there is something wrong during
initialization, so the function needs return errno when any request_irq
is failed.
For the first request_irq, some code has prepared its resources before
this call, so I suppose it successful. However, the return value must be
tested.
Regards,
Guan Xuetao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-15 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-11 19:36 [PATCH 0/7] " Julia Lawall
2012-03-11 19:36 ` [PATCH 1/7] drivers/video/pvr2fb.c: " Julia Lawall
2012-03-21 18:37 ` Florian Tobias Schandinat
2012-03-11 19:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] drivers/scsi/arm/{cumana_2,eesox,powertec}.c: " Julia Lawall
2012-03-11 19:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] drivers/net/irda/{ali-ircc,via-ircc,w83977af-ir}.c: " Julia Lawall
2012-03-11 19:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] arch/sh/drivers/dma/{dma-g2,dmabrg}.c: " Julia Lawall
2012-03-15 6:14 ` Paul Mundt
2012-03-11 19:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] drivers/atm/eni.c: " Julia Lawall
2012-03-11 20:58 ` Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
2012-03-11 21:08 ` Julia Lawall
2012-03-11 21:16 ` Julia Lawall
2012-03-11 22:42 ` David Miller
2012-03-11 19:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] drivers/input/touchscreen/hp680_ts_input.c: " Julia Lawall
2012-03-11 23:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-03-11 19:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] arch/unicore32/kernel/dma.c: " Julia Lawall
2012-03-12 0:58 ` Guan Xuetao
2012-03-12 5:27 ` Julia Lawall
2012-03-13 7:10 ` Guan Xuetao
2012-03-13 8:23 ` Julia Lawall
2012-03-14 8:07 ` Guan Xuetao
2012-03-14 8:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-14 8:42 ` Guan Xuetao
2012-03-14 9:23 ` Julia Lawall
2012-03-15 1:01 ` Guan Xuetao [this message]
2012-03-15 6:10 ` Julia Lawall
2012-03-15 8:07 ` walter harms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1331773284.2389.61.camel@epip-laptop \
--to=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®