From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
"Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] irqchip/mips-gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 09:23:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13319270.gRd1cmLsry@np-p-burton> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170815113447.14507-12-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1943 bytes --]
Hi Marc,
On Tuesday, 15 August 2017 04:34:46 PDT Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The MIPS GIC driver only targets a single CPU at a time, even if
> the notional affinity is wider. Let's inform the core code
> about this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 39bfa5b25b54..bca9a88012f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ config IRQ_MIPS_CPU
> select GENERIC_IRQ_IPI if SYS_SUPPORTS_MULTITHREADING
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY if GENERIC_IRQ_IPI
> + select GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK
>
> config CLPS711X_IRQCHIP
> bool
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> index 6ab1d3afec02..e075cb25fad6 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const
> struct cpumask *cpumask, set_bit(irq,
> pcpu_masks[cpumask_first(&tmp)].pcpu_mask);
>
> cpumask_copy(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), cpumask);
> + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask);
This doesn't seem right - it's just setting the effective affinity to the same
as affinity, not taking into account CPU restrictions at all. I think this
should be:
irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpumask_first(&tmp)));
(or something cleaner but to that effect)
Thanks,
Paul
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
>
> return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY;
> @@ -716,6 +717,7 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d,
> unsigned int virq, if (err)
> return err;
>
> + irqd_set_single_target(irq_desc_get_irq_data(irq_to_desc(virq)));
> return gic_shared_irq_domain_map(d, virq, hwirq, 0);
> }
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 11:34 [PATCH 00/12] genirq/irqchip: Effective affinity fixups Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 01/12] genirq: Restrict effective affinity to single-target interrupts Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 12:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-15 12:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 02/12] genirq/proc: Use the the accessor to report the effective affinity Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 03/12] irqchip/gic: Report that effective affinity is a single target Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 04/12] irqchip/gic-v3: " Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 05/12] irqchip/gic-v3-its: " Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 06/12] irqchip/armada-370-xp: " Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 07/12] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: " Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 08/12] irqchip/bcm-7038-l1: " Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 09/12] irqchip/metag-ext: " Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 10/12] irqchip/hip04: " Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 11/12] irqchip/mips-gic: " Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 16:23 ` Paul Burton [this message]
2017-08-15 16:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 16:48 ` Paul Burton
2017-08-15 11:34 ` [PATCH 12/12] irqchip/xtensa-mx: " Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13319270.gRd1cmLsry@np-p-burton \
--to=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=cernekee@gmail.com \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=matt.redfearn@imgtec.com \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®