mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] proc: use task_access_lock() instead of ptrace_may_access()
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:59:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1334123976-11681-5-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334123976-11681-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>

There are several places in fs/proc/base.c still use ptrace_may_access()
directly to check the permission, actually this just gets a snapshot of
the permission, nothing prevents the target task from raising the priviledges
itself, it is better to use task_access_lock() for these places, to hold
the priviledges.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
---
 fs/proc/base.c |   74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index f1d18fc..2dff86b 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -253,6 +253,23 @@ static int proc_pid_auxv(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
 	return res;
 }
 
+static int task_access_lock(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
+
+{
+	int err = mutex_lock_killable(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+	if (!ptrace_may_access(task, mode)) {
+		mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
+		return -EPERM;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void task_access_unlock(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
+}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
 /*
@@ -264,35 +281,18 @@ static int proc_pid_wchan(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
 	unsigned long wchan;
 	char symname[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
 
+	if (task_access_lock(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
+		return 0;
 	wchan = get_wchan(task);
 
+	task_access_unlock(task);
 	if (lookup_symbol_name(wchan, symname) < 0)
-		if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
-			return 0;
-		else
-			return sprintf(buffer, "%lu", wchan);
+		return sprintf(buffer, "%lu", wchan);
 	else
 		return sprintf(buffer, "%s", symname);
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_KALLSYMS */
 
-static int task_access_lock(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
-{
-	int err = mutex_lock_killable(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-	if (!ptrace_may_access(task, mode)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
-		return -EPERM;
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void task_access_unlock(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
 
 #define MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH	64
@@ -512,23 +512,6 @@ static int proc_pid_syscall(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
 /*                       Here the fs part begins                        */
 /************************************************************************/
 
-/* permission checks */
-static int proc_fd_access_allowed(struct inode *inode)
-{
-	struct task_struct *task;
-	int allowed = 0;
-	/* Allow access to a task's file descriptors if it is us or we
-	 * may use ptrace attach to the process and find out that
-	 * information.
-	 */
-	task = get_proc_task(inode);
-	if (task) {
-		allowed = ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
-		put_task_struct(task);
-	}
-	return allowed;
-}
-
 int proc_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
 {
 	int error;
@@ -1425,17 +1408,21 @@ static int proc_exe_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *exe_path)
 static void *proc_pid_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
+	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
 	int error = -EACCES;
 
 	/* We don't need a base pointer in the /proc filesystem */
 	path_put(&nd->path);
 
 	/* Are we allowed to snoop on the tasks file descriptors? */
-	if (!proc_fd_access_allowed(inode))
+	error = task_access_lock(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
+	if (error)
 		goto out;
 
 	error = PROC_I(inode)->op.proc_get_link(dentry, &nd->path);
+	task_access_unlock(task);
 out:
+	put_task_struct(task);
 	return ERR_PTR(error);
 }
 
@@ -1467,19 +1454,24 @@ static int proc_pid_readlink(struct dentry * dentry, char __user * buffer, int b
 {
 	int error = -EACCES;
 	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
+	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
 	struct path path;
 
 	/* Are we allowed to snoop on the tasks file descriptors? */
-	if (!proc_fd_access_allowed(inode))
+	error = task_access_lock(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
+	if (error)
 		goto out;
 
 	error = PROC_I(inode)->op.proc_get_link(dentry, &path);
 	if (error)
-		goto out;
+		goto out_unlock;
 
 	error = do_proc_readlink(&path, buffer, buflen);
 	path_put(&path);
+out_unlock:
+	task_access_unlock(task);
 out:
+	put_task_struct(task);
 	return error;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.7.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-11  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-11  5:59 [PATCH 1/6 v3] proc: clean up /proc/<pid>/environ handling Cong Wang
2012-04-11  5:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] proc: unify ptrace_may_access locking code Cong Wang
2012-04-11  5:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] proc: remove mm_for_maps() Cong Wang
2012-04-12  0:38   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-11  5:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] proc: use mm_access() instead of ptrace_may_access() Cong Wang
2012-04-11  5:59 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-04-12 13:22   ` [PATCH 5/6] proc: use task_access_lock() " Cong Wang
2012-04-12 15:29     ` Djalal Harouni
2012-04-11  5:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] proc: use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() Cong Wang
2012-04-12  0:41   ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-12 13:17     ` Cong Wang
2012-04-12 13:23   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-04-12 18:46     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-12 19:26       ` Hugh Dickins
2012-04-12 19:31         ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1334123976-11681-5-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=segoon@openwall.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®