From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] driver core patches for 3.5-rc1 - try 2
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:12:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337724736.11918.8.camel@joe2Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120522220534.GC12705@kroah.com>
(adding lkml and not editing Greg's reply)
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:05 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:58:47PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > While there are several things I like about the
> > printk modifications, (binary header, delta time,
> > slightly better partial message deinterleaving,
> > global msg_id, kmsg is ok too), I am concerned
> > about the utility and expectations for the new
> > [v]printk_emit functions.
> >
> > I think it is not really ready to be merged
> > at this time.
> >
> > The commit sequencing was unclean.
>
> Yes, but the build was never broken, the system always worked, and the
> end result was agreed apon by everyone as a nice addition.
>
> > The original commit originally required KERN_CONT
> > and it was modified by another commit to return
> > to the current behavior.
> >
> > What really are the expectations and true use-cases
> > for [v]printk_emit?
>
> What's wrong with the existing use case? Since when do we write
> use-cases for kernel functions?
When it's a generic function that appears to be used
to attach additional data to message logging,
and it takes up buffer space and currently reduces
the number of dev_<foo> messages in dmesg without
adding value.
What's it for and who's going to use it and more
importantly, why?
I do not want to link human readable messaging with
machine parsing of binary data. I'm not sure it's
useful and possibly sets expectations for immutability.
> > How is it really better that what is available now?
> >
> > Perhaps it would be better to respin all the
> > printk modifications without adding [v]printk_emit
> > and have the [v]printk_emit bits debated a bit more.
>
> I'm always glad to review patches, but to just propose something that
> works to be reverted without a patch to replace the functionality, isn't
> ok.
It hasn't been committed yet in anything other than
-next.
Lots of stuff gets committed there and later removed
and hits Linus' mainline tree.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1337723927.9270.15.camel@joe2Laptop>
2012-05-22 22:08 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20120522220534.GC12705@kroah.com>
2012-05-22 22:12 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2012-05-23 6:12 ` Greg KH
2012-05-22 22:01 Joe Perches
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-22 15:14 Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337724736.11918.8.camel@joe2Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®