From: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:43:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339055005.18639.11.camel@ThinkPad-T420> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120606140357.GB32472@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 10:03 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 12:14:33PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > I didn't think it would be compiler dependent as I do not know what
> > > compiler the reporter was using. I used a RHEL-6 4.4.4 compiler (which
> > > you probably don't have :^) ).
> >
> > Indeed, somehow I failed to see the obvious - it's commit
> > 72b3fb24713755cf9740b403e95aa67ceedf3509 that causes
> > these problems. Instantiating static data like this just doesn't
> > play with any of the pointers passed being into .init.*.
> >
> > I'd suggest either open coding register_nmi_handler() (with
> > the static data put into __initdata), or further abstracting it
> > by allowing an optional fifth argument (specifying the section
> > annotation if needed).
>
> Ah. Thanks for figuring that out!! I will post a patch opencoding it.
>
Hi Don,
How about the following patch, adding an optional fifth argument as Jan
mentioned? We don't need change other users of register_nmi_handler().
Thanks,
Zhong
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
index 0e3793b..c0fa356 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h
@@ -44,14 +44,14 @@ struct nmiaction {
const char *name;
};
-#define register_nmi_handler(t, fn, fg, n) \
+#define register_nmi_handler(t, fn, fg, n, init...) \
({ \
- static struct nmiaction fn##_na = { \
+ static struct nmiaction init fn##_na = { \
.handler = (fn), \
.name = (n), \
.flags = (fg), \
}; \
- __register_nmi_handler((t), &fn##_na); \
+ __register_nmi_handler((t), &fn##_na); \
})
int __register_nmi_handler(unsigned int, struct nmiaction *);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
index e31bf8d..6d9582e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ static int __init nmi_unk_cb(unsigned int val, struct
pt_regs *regs)
static void __init init_nmi_testsuite(void)
{
/* trap all the unknown NMIs we may generate */
- register_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk");
+ register_nmi_handler(NMI_UNKNOWN, nmi_unk_cb, 0, "nmi_selftest_unk",
+ __initdata);
}
static void __init cleanup_nmi_testsuite(void)
@@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ static void __init test_nmi_ipi(struct cpumask *mask)
unsigned long timeout;
if (register_nmi_handler(NMI_LOCAL, test_nmi_ipi_callback,
- NMI_FLAG_FIRST, "nmi_selftest")) {
+ NMI_FLAG_FIRST, "nmi_selftest", __initdata)) {
nmi_fail = FAILURE;
return;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-07 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-04 19:56 Don Zickus
2012-06-05 8:12 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-05 14:47 ` Don Zickus
2012-06-05 15:42 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-05 18:35 ` Don Zickus
2012-06-06 11:14 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-06 14:03 ` Don Zickus
2012-06-06 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-06 18:28 ` Don Zickus
2012-06-07 7:43 ` Li Zhong [this message]
2012-06-07 12:48 ` Don Zickus
2012-06-08 20:51 ` Don Zickus
2012-06-11 1:36 ` Zhong Li
2012-06-11 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-05 16:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-06-05 16:18 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-05 17:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-06-08 2:06 ` Don Zickus
2012-06-08 5:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-06-06 14:05 Don Zickus
2012-06-06 21:22 ` Witold Baryluk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1339055005.18639.11.camel@ThinkPad-T420 \
--to=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®