mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Place pointer to call_rcu() in rcu_data structure
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:05:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339794370-28119-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339794370-28119-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>

This is a preparatory commit for increasing rcu_barrier()'s concurrency.
It adds a pointer in the rcu_data structure to the corresponding call_rcu()
function.  This allows a pointer to the rcu_data structure to imply the
function pointer, which allows _rcu_barrier() state to be placed in the
rcu_state structure.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c        |   27 ++++++++++++---------------
 kernel/rcutree.h        |    2 ++
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |    5 +++--
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 8ce1b1d..8b3ab4e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -62,8 +62,9 @@
 
 static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
 
-#define RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(sname) { \
+#define RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(sname, cr) { \
 	.level = { &sname##_state.node[0] }, \
+	.call = cr, \
 	.fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE, \
 	.gpnum = -300, \
 	.completed = -300, \
@@ -76,10 +77,11 @@ static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
 	.name = #sname, \
 }
 
-struct rcu_state rcu_sched_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_sched);
+struct rcu_state rcu_sched_state =
+	RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_sched, call_rcu_sched);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_sched_data);
 
-struct rcu_state rcu_bh_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_bh);
+struct rcu_state rcu_bh_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_bh, call_rcu_bh);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_data);
 
 static struct rcu_state *rcu_state;
@@ -2279,21 +2281,17 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	struct rcu_head *head = &per_cpu(rcu_barrier_head, cpu);
-	void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
-			      void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
+	struct rcu_state *rsp = type;
 
 	atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
-	call_rcu_func = type;
-	call_rcu_func(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
+	rsp->call(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
 }
 
 /*
  * Orchestrate the specified type of RCU barrier, waiting for all
  * RCU callbacks of the specified type to complete.
  */
-static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
-			 void (*call_rcu_func)(struct rcu_head *head,
-					       void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head)))
+static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -2345,8 +2343,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 			while (cpu_is_offline(cpu) && ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen))
 				schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
 		} else if (ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) {
-			smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func,
-						 (void *)call_rcu_func, 1);
+			smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func, rsp, 1);
 			preempt_enable();
 		} else {
 			preempt_enable();
@@ -2367,7 +2364,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
 	atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
 	smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* Ensure atomic_inc() before callback. */
-	call_rcu_func(&rh, rcu_barrier_callback);
+	rsp->call(&rh, rcu_barrier_callback);
 
 	/*
 	 * Now that we have an rcu_barrier_callback() callback on each
@@ -2390,7 +2387,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp,
  */
 void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
 {
-	_rcu_barrier(&rcu_bh_state, call_rcu_bh);
+	_rcu_barrier(&rcu_bh_state);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
 
@@ -2399,7 +2396,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_bh);
  */
 void rcu_barrier_sched(void)
 {
-	_rcu_barrier(&rcu_sched_state, call_rcu_sched);
+	_rcu_barrier(&rcu_sched_state);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_sched);
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index df3c2c8..15837d7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -350,6 +350,8 @@ struct rcu_state {
 	u32 levelcnt[MAX_RCU_LVLS + 1];		/* # nodes in each level. */
 	u8 levelspread[RCU_NUM_LVLS];		/* kids/node in each level. */
 	struct rcu_data __percpu *rda;		/* pointer of percu rcu_data. */
+	void (*call)(struct rcu_head *head,	/* call_rcu() flavor. */
+		     void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
 
 	/* The following fields are guarded by the root rcu_node's lock. */
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 7cb86ae..6888706 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
 
-struct rcu_state rcu_preempt_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_preempt);
+struct rcu_state rcu_preempt_state =
+	RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_preempt, call_rcu);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data);
 static struct rcu_state *rcu_state = &rcu_preempt_state;
 
@@ -944,7 +945,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu)
  */
 void rcu_barrier(void)
 {
-	_rcu_barrier(&rcu_preempt_state, call_rcu);
+	_rcu_barrier(&rcu_preempt_state);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
 
-- 
1.7.8


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-15 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 21:05 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] Improvements to rcu_barrier() and RT response on big systems Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:05   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Size rcu_node tree from nr_cpu_ids rather than NR_CPUS Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:47     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  0:37       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  5:17         ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  6:38           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  9:17             ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 14:44               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 14:51                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 20:31                   ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:05   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Prevent excessive line length in RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:48     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:05   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-06-15 22:08     ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Place pointer to call_rcu() in rcu_data structure Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Move _rcu_barrier()'s rcu_head structures to rcu_data structures Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:19     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_cpu_count to rcu_state structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:44     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_completion " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:51     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_mutex " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:55     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] rcu: Increasing rcu_barrier() concurrency Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:31     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  0:21       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-16  0:49         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  0:48       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Add tracing for _rcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:35     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Add rcu_barrier() statistics to debugfs tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:38     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcu: Remove unneeded __rcu_process_callbacks() argument Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:37     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Introduce for_each_rcu_flavor() and use it Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:52     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  1:01       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  5:35         ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  6:36           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu: Use for_each_rcu_flavor() in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:59     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  0:56       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  5:22         ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  6:42           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK code no longer ever dead Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  0:02     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  0:04       ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  1:04         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:10     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1339794370-28119-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®