From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] perf, amd: Generalize northbridge constraints code for family 15h
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:10:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340129448-8690-8-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340129448-8690-1-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
Generalize northbridge constraints code for family 15h and use this
code there too. The main difference is the use of a counter mask for
northbridge counters. Families others than 15h use unconstraints mask
(any generic counter) while on family 15h we have 4 separate nb
counters. We get the nb counter bit mask from the constraint that we
get for a nb event. Still, the nb counters are not yet enabled. See
next patch for this.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index 27b2806..e538512 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -188,20 +188,13 @@ static inline int amd_has_nb(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
return nb && nb->nb_id != -1;
}
-static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
- struct perf_event *event)
+static void amd_put_nb_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
+ struct perf_event *event)
{
- struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;
int i;
/*
- * only care about NB events
- */
- if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(hwc)))
- return;
-
- /*
* need to scan whole list because event may not have
* been assigned during scheduling
*
@@ -247,12 +240,13 @@ static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
*
* Given that resources are allocated (cmpxchg), they must be
* eventually freed for others to use. This is accomplished by
- * calling amd_put_event_constraints().
+ * calling amd_put_nb_event_constraints().
*
* Non NB events are not impacted by this restriction.
*/
static struct event_constraint *
-amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+__amd_get_nb_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ struct event_constraint *c)
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;
@@ -260,12 +254,6 @@ amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
int idx, new = -1;
/*
- * if not NB event or no NB, then no constraints
- */
- if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(hwc)))
- return &unconstrained;
-
- /*
* detect if already present, if so reuse
*
* cannot merge with actual allocation
@@ -275,7 +263,7 @@ amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
* because of successive calls to x86_schedule_events() from
* hw_perf_group_sched_in() without hw_perf_enable()
*/
- for_each_generic_counter(idx) {
+ for_each_set_bit(idx, c->idxmsk, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
if (new == -1 || hwc->idx == idx)
/* assign free slot, prefer hwc->idx */
old = cmpxchg(nb->owners + idx, NULL, event);
@@ -481,7 +469,7 @@ static struct event_constraint amd_f15_PMC50 = EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x3F, 0);
static struct event_constraint amd_f15_PMC53 = EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0x38, 0);
static struct event_constraint *
-amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+__amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
unsigned int event_code = amd_get_event_code(hwc);
@@ -552,6 +540,39 @@ amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *ev
}
}
+static struct event_constraint *
+amd_get_nb_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event,
+ struct event_constraint *c)
+{
+ /*
+ * only care about NB events
+ */
+ if (!(amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(&event->hw)))
+ return c;
+
+ return __amd_get_nb_event_constraints(cpuc, event, c);
+}
+
+static struct event_constraint *
+amd_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return amd_get_nb_event_constraints(cpuc, event, &unconstrained);
+}
+
+static struct event_constraint *
+amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct event_constraint *c = __amd_get_event_constraints_f15h(cpuc, event);
+ return amd_get_nb_event_constraints(cpuc, event, c);
+}
+
+static void amd_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
+ struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if (amd_has_nb(cpuc) && amd_is_nb_event(&event->hw))
+ amd_put_nb_event_constraints(cpuc, event);
+}
+
static __initconst const struct x86_pmu amd_pmu = {
.name = "AMD",
.handle_irq = x86_pmu_handle_irq,
--
1.7.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-19 18:10 [PATCH 00/10] perf, x86: Add northbridge counter support for AMD " Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf, amd: Rework northbridge event constraints handler Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf, x86: Rework counter reservation code Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf, x86: Use bitmasks for generic counters Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf, x86: Rename Intel specific macros Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf, x86: Move Intel specific code to intel_pmu_init() Robert Richter
2012-06-20 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 14:22 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf, amd: Unify AMD's generic and family 15h pmus Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf, amd: Enable northbridge counters on family 15h Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf, x86: Improve debug output in check_hw_exists() Robert Richter
2012-06-19 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf, amd: Check northbridge event config value Robert Richter
2012-06-20 8:36 ` [PATCH 00/10] perf, x86: Add northbridge counter support for AMD family 15h Stephane Eranian
2012-06-20 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <CABPqkBS9hRxKLsecVK+AgRue6oqTtAg4=0Dpd5Z2VwAUja50fw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-06-20 9:29 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-20 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 10:00 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-20 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 12:29 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-20 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 16:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-20 10:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-06-20 12:41 ` Robert Richter
2012-06-20 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340129448-8690-8-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome