mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/22] rcu: Use for_each_rcu_flavor() in TREE_RCU tracing
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:17:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340378241-6458-16-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340378241-6458-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit applies the new for_each_rcu_flavor() macro to the
kernel/rcutree_trace.c file.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree_trace.c |  116 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
index 057408b..a16ddbd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
@@ -46,24 +46,15 @@
 #define RCU_TREE_NONCORE
 #include "rcutree.h"
 
-static void print_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
-{
-	seq_printf(m, "%c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
-		   rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.',
-		   atomic_read(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count),
-		   rsp->n_barrier_done);
-}
-
 static int show_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt: ");
-	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched: ");
-	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_sched_state);
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh: ");
-	print_rcubarrier(m, &rcu_bh_state);
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
+		seq_printf(m, "%s: %c bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
+			   rsp->name, rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress ? 'B' : '.',
+			   atomic_read(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count),
+			   rsp->n_barrier_done);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -129,24 +120,16 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		   rdp->n_cbs_invoked, rdp->n_cbs_orphaned, rdp->n_cbs_adopted);
 }
 
-#define PRINT_RCU_DATA(name, func, m) \
-	do { \
-		int _p_r_d_i; \
-		\
-		for_each_possible_cpu(_p_r_d_i) \
-			func(m, &per_cpu(name, _p_r_d_i)); \
-	} while (0)
-
 static int show_rcudata(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data, m);
+	int cpu;
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
+		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
+		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+			print_one_rcu_data(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -200,6 +183,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 
 static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
+	int cpu;
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
 	seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\",");
 	seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\",");
 	seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\"");
@@ -207,14 +193,11 @@ static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	seq_puts(m, "\"kt\",\"ktl\"");
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
 	seq_puts(m, ",\"b\",\"ci\",\"co\",\"ca\"\n");
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_preempt:\"\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_preempt_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_sched:\"\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_sched_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
-	seq_puts(m, "\"rcu_bh:\"\n");
-	PRINT_RCU_DATA(rcu_bh_data, print_one_rcu_data_csv, m);
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
+		seq_printf(m, "\"%s:\"\n", rsp->name);
+		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+			print_one_rcu_data_csv(m, per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu));
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -304,9 +287,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 
 	gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
-	seq_printf(m, "c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
+	seq_printf(m, "%s: c=%lu g=%lu s=%d jfq=%ld j=%x "
 		      "nfqs=%lu/nfqsng=%lu(%lu) fqlh=%lu oqlen=%ld/%ld\n",
-		   rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
+		   rsp->name, rsp->completed, gpnum, rsp->fqs_state,
 		   (long)(rsp->jiffies_force_qs - jiffies),
 		   (int)(jiffies & 0xffff),
 		   rsp->n_force_qs, rsp->n_force_qs_ngp,
@@ -329,14 +312,10 @@ static void print_one_rcu_state(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 
 static int show_rcuhier(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
-	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
-	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_sched_state);
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
-	print_one_rcu_state(m, &rcu_bh_state);
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
+		print_one_rcu_state(m, rsp);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -377,11 +356,10 @@ static void show_one_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 
 static int show_rcugp(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_sched_state);
-	show_one_rcugp(m, &rcu_bh_state);
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
+		show_one_rcugp(m, rsp);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -416,28 +394,20 @@ static void print_one_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		   rdp->n_rp_need_nothing);
 }
 
-static void print_rcu_pendings(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_state *rsp)
+static int show_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	struct rcu_data *rdp;
-
-	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
-		if (rdp->beenonline)
-			print_one_rcu_pending(m, rdp);
+	struct rcu_state *rsp;
+
+	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
+		seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", rsp->name);
+		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+			rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
+			if (rdp->beenonline)
+				print_one_rcu_pending(m, rdp);
+		}
 	}
-}
-
-static int show_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_preempt:\n");
-	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_preempt_state);
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_sched:\n");
-	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_sched_state);
-	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh:\n");
-	print_rcu_pendings(m, &rcu_bh_state);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.8


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-22 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-22 15:16 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/22] v2 Improvements to rcu_barrier() and RT response on big systems Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/22] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/22] rcu: Four-level hierarchy is no longer experimental Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/22] rcu: Size rcu_node tree from nr_cpu_ids rather than NR_CPUS Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/22] rcu: Prevent excessive line length in RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/22] rcu: Place pointer to call_rcu() in rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/22] rcu: Move _rcu_barrier()'s rcu_head structures to rcu_data structures Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/22] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_cpu_count to rcu_state structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/22] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_completion " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/22] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_mutex " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/22] rcu: Remove needless initialization Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/22] rcu: Increase rcu_barrier() concurrency Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/22] rcu: Add tracing for _rcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/22] rcu: Add rcu_barrier() statistics to debugfs tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/22] rcu: Remove unneeded __rcu_process_callbacks() argument Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/22] rcu: Introduce for_each_rcu_flavor() and use it Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/22] rcu: RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK code no longer ever dead Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/22] rcu: Move RCU grace-period initialization into a kthread Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/22] rcu: Allow RCU grace-period initialization to be preempted Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/22] rcu: Move RCU grace-period cleanup into kthread Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/22] rcu: Allow RCU grace-period cleanup to be preempted Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/22] rcu: Prevent offline CPUs from executing RCU core code Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-01  6:19   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/22] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Rusty Russell
2012-07-01  7:17     ` Josh Triplett
2012-07-01 12:52       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-01 17:45         ` Josh Triplett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340378241-6458-16-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sbw@mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®