mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	sbw@mit.edu, patches@linaro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/17] rcu: Disable preemption in rcu_blocking_is_gp()
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:35:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340379312-6684-16-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340379312-6684-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

It is time to optimize CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU's synchronize_rcu()
for uniprocessor optimization, which means that rcu_blocking_is_gp()
can no longer rely on RCU read-side critical sections having disabled
preemption.  This commit therefore disables preemption across
rcu_blocking_is_gp()'s scan of the cpu_online_mask.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c |   19 ++-----------------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index ce175b6..c0cc41f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1978,28 +1978,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_bh);
  * occasionally incorrectly indicate that there are multiple CPUs online
  * when there was in fact only one the whole time, as this just adds
  * some overhead: RCU still operates correctly.
- *
- * Of course, sampling num_online_cpus() with preemption enabled can
- * give erroneous results if there are concurrent CPU-hotplug operations.
- * For example, given a demonic sequence of preemptions in num_online_cpus()
- * and CPU-hotplug operations, there could be two or more CPUs online at
- * all times, but num_online_cpus() might well return one (or even zero).
- *
- * However, all such demonic sequences require at least one CPU-offline
- * operation.  Furthermore, rcu_blocking_is_gp() giving the wrong answer
- * is only a problem if there is an RCU read-side critical section executing
- * throughout.  But RCU-sched and RCU-bh read-side critical sections
- * disable either preemption or bh, which prevents a CPU from going offline.
- * Therefore, the only way that rcu_blocking_is_gp() can incorrectly return
- * that there is only one CPU when in fact there was more than one throughout
- * is when there were no RCU readers in the system.  If there are no
- * RCU readers, the grace period by definition can be of zero length,
- * regardless of the number of online CPUs.
  */
 static inline int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
 {
 	might_sleep();  /* Check for RCU read-side critical section. */
+	preempt_disable();
 	return num_online_cpus() <= 1;
+	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.7.8


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-22 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-22 15:35 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/17] v2 Fixups for 3.6 Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:34 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/17] rcu: Fix detection of abruptly-ending stall Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:34   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/17] rcu: Consolidate duplicate callback-list initialization Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:34   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/17] rcu: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to ->qlen accesses Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:34   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/17] rcu: Add a gcc-style structure initializer for RCU pointers Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/17] rcu: Use new RCU_POINTER_INITIALIZER for gcc-style initializations Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/17] rcu: Remove return value from RCU_INIT_POINTER() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/17] key: Remove extraneous parentheses from rcu_assign_keypointer() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/17] rcu: Remove return value from rcu_assign_pointer() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/17] rcu: Consolidate tree/tiny __rcu_read_{,un}lock() implementations Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/17] rcu: Remove function versions of __kfree_rcu and __is_kfree_rcu_offset Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/17] rcu: Make __call_rcu() handle invocation from idle Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/17] rcu: Prevent __call_rcu() from invoking RCU core on offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/17] rcu: Split RCU core processing out of __call_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/17] rcu: Fix rcu_is_cpu_idle() #ifdef in TINY_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/17] Prevent uninitialized string in RCU stall info Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 15:35   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-06-22 15:35   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/17] rcu: Add check for CPUs going offline with callbacks queued Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 16:02   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/17] rcu: Add a gcc-style structure initializer for RCU pointers David Howells
2012-06-22 16:02   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/17] rcu: Use new RCU_POINTER_INITIALIZER for gcc-style initializations David Howells
2012-06-22 16:04   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/17] key: Remove extraneous parentheses from rcu_assign_keypointer() David Howells
2012-06-23  5:59     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-25  4:02       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-22 16:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/17] rcu: Remove return value from RCU_INIT_POINTER() David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1340379312-6684-16-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sbw@mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®