From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>, tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] block: Remove some unnecessary bi_vcnt usage
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:59:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347058760-30794-10-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347058760-30794-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com>
More prep work for immutable bvecs/effecient bio splitting - usage of
bi_vcnt has to be auditing, so getting rid of all the unnecessary usage
makes that easier.
Plus, bio_segments() is really what this code wanted, as it respects the
current value of bi_idx.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c | 6 +++---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 6 +++---
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c | 10 +++++-----
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
index 551262e..5406a9f 100644
--- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
@@ -2235,10 +2235,10 @@ static int mptsas_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
}
/* do we need to support multiple segments? */
- if (req->bio->bi_vcnt > 1 || rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+ if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1 || bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT "%s: multiple segments req %u %u, rsp %u %u\n",
- ioc->name, __func__, req->bio->bi_vcnt, blk_rq_bytes(req),
- rsp->bio->bi_vcnt, blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
+ ioc->name, __func__, bio_segments(req->bio), blk_rq_bytes(req),
+ bio_segments(rsp->bio), blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index efc6e72..ee331a7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -2151,10 +2151,10 @@ int sas_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
}
/* do we need to support multiple segments? */
- if (req->bio->bi_vcnt > 1 || rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+ if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1 || bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
printk("%s: multiple segments req %u %u, rsp %u %u\n",
- __func__, req->bio->bi_vcnt, blk_rq_bytes(req),
- rsp->bio->bi_vcnt, blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
+ __func__, bio_segments(req->bio), blk_rq_bytes(req),
+ bio_segments(rsp->bio), blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c
index c6cf20f..403a57b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c
@@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
ioc->transport_cmds.status = MPT2_CMD_PENDING;
/* Check if the request is split across multiple segments */
- if (req->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+ if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1) {
u32 offset = 0;
/* Allocate memory and copy the request */
@@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
/* Check if the response needs to be populated across
* multiple segments */
- if (rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+ if (bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
pci_addr_in = pci_alloc_consistent(ioc->pdev, blk_rq_bytes(rsp),
&pci_dma_in);
if (!pci_addr_in) {
@@ -2038,7 +2038,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
sgl_flags = (MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_SIMPLE_ELEMENT |
MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_END_OF_BUFFER | MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_HOST_TO_IOC);
sgl_flags = sgl_flags << MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_SHIFT;
- if (req->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+ if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1) {
ioc->base_add_sg_single(psge, sgl_flags |
(blk_rq_bytes(req) - 4), pci_dma_out);
} else {
@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_LAST_ELEMENT | MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_END_OF_BUFFER |
MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_END_OF_LIST);
sgl_flags = sgl_flags << MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_SHIFT;
- if (rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+ if (bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
ioc->base_add_sg_single(psge, sgl_flags |
(blk_rq_bytes(rsp) + 4), pci_dma_in);
} else {
@@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
le16_to_cpu(mpi_reply->ResponseDataLength);
/* check if the resp needs to be copied from the allocated
* pci mem */
- if (rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+ if (bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
u32 offset = 0;
u32 bytes_to_copy =
le16_to_cpu(mpi_reply->ResponseDataLength);
--
1.7.12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-07 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 22:59 [PATCH 0/9] Prep work for immutable bio vecs Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: Convert integrity to bvec_alloc_bs(), and a bugfix Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` [PATCH 2/9] block: Add bio_advance() Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` [PATCH 3/9] block: Refactor blk_update_request() Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` [PATCH 4/9] md: Convert md_trim_bio() to use bio_advance() Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` [PATCH 5/9] block: Add bio_end() Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] block: Use bio_sectors() more consistently Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` [PATCH 7/9] block: Don't use bi_idx in bio_split() or require it to be 0 Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` [PATCH 8/9] block: Remove bi_idx references Kent Overstreet
2012-09-07 22:59 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2012-09-08 19:41 ` [PATCH 0/9] Prep work for immutable bio vecs Tejun Heo
2012-09-10 1:21 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347058760-30794-10-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com \
--to=koverstreet@google.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®