mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] x86/mm: calculate_table_space_size based on memory ranges that are being mapped
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:57:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348991844-12285-13-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348991844-12285-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

From: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>

Current logic finds enough space for direct mapping page tables from 0
to end. Instead, we only need to find enough space to cover mr[0].start
to mr[nr_range].end -- the range that is actually being mapped by
init_memory_mapping()

This patch also reportedly fixes suspend/resume issue reported in:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/11/83

-v2: update with calculate_table_space_size()
     clear max_pfn_mapped before init_all_memory_mapping to get right value
					  -Yinghai Lu

Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/init.c |   51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index 3237c9b..c12dfd5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -191,39 +191,48 @@ static int __meminit split_mem_range(struct map_range *mr, int nr_range,
 	return nr_range;
 }
 
-static unsigned long __init calculate_table_space_size(unsigned long begin,
+static unsigned long __init calculate_table_space_size(unsigned long start,
 					  unsigned long end)
 {
-	unsigned long puds, pmds, ptes, tables;
+	unsigned long puds = 0, pmds = 0, ptes = 0, tables;
+	struct map_range mr[NR_RANGE_MR];
+	int nr_range, i;
 
-	puds = (end + PUD_SIZE - 1) >> PUD_SHIFT;
-	tables = roundup(puds * sizeof(pud_t), PAGE_SIZE);
+	pr_info("calculate_table_space_size: [mem %#010lx-%#010lx]\n",
+	       start, end - 1);
 
-	if (page_size_mask & (1 << PG_LEVEL_1G)) {
-		unsigned long extra;
+	memset(mr, 0, sizeof(mr));
+	nr_range = 0;
+	nr_range = split_mem_range(mr, nr_range, start, end);
 
-		extra = end - ((end>>PUD_SHIFT) << PUD_SHIFT);
-		pmds = (extra + PMD_SIZE - 1) >> PMD_SHIFT;
-	} else
-		pmds = (end + PMD_SIZE - 1) >> PMD_SHIFT;
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_range; i++) {
+		unsigned long range, extra;
 
-	tables += roundup(pmds * sizeof(pmd_t), PAGE_SIZE);
+		range = mr[i].end - mr[i].start;
+		puds += (range + PUD_SIZE - 1) >> PUD_SHIFT;
 
-	if (page_size_mask & (1 << PG_LEVEL_2M)) {
-		unsigned long extra;
+		if (mr[i].page_size_mask & (1 << PG_LEVEL_1G)) {
+			extra = range - ((range >> PUD_SHIFT) << PUD_SHIFT);
+			pmds += (extra + PMD_SIZE - 1) >> PMD_SHIFT;
+		} else
+			pmds += (range + PMD_SIZE - 1) >> PMD_SHIFT;
 
-		extra = end - ((end>>PMD_SHIFT) << PMD_SHIFT);
+		if (mr[i].page_size_mask & (1 << PG_LEVEL_2M)) {
+			extra = range - ((range >> PMD_SHIFT) << PMD_SHIFT);
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-		extra += PMD_SIZE;
+			extra += PMD_SIZE;
 #endif
-		/* The first 2/4M doesn't use large pages. */
-		if (begin < PMD_SIZE)
-			extra += (PMD_SIZE - begin) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+			/* The first 2/4M doesn't use large pages. */
+			if (mr[i].start < PMD_SIZE)
+				extra += PMD_SIZE - mr[i].start;
 
-		ptes = (extra + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-	} else
-		ptes = (end + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+			ptes += (extra + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+		} else
+			ptes += (range + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	}
 
+	tables = roundup(puds * sizeof(pud_t), PAGE_SIZE);
+	tables += roundup(pmds * sizeof(pmd_t), PAGE_SIZE);
 	tables += roundup(ptes * sizeof(pte_t), PAGE_SIZE);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-- 
1.7.7


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-30  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-30  7:57 [PATCH -v4 00/13] x86, mm: init_memory_mapping cleanup Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86, mm: Add global page_size_mask and probe one time only Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86, mm: Split out split_mem_range from init_memory_mapping Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86, mm: Move init_memory_mapping calling out of setup.c Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2012-10-01 11:00   ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-10-03 16:51     ` Jacob Shin
2012-10-03 18:34       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-04 13:56       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 21:52         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-04 16:19       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 16:46         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 21:29           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 21:04             ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-05 21:19               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 21:32                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-05 21:37                   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 21:41                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-05 21:43                       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 22:01                         ` 896MB address limit (was: Re: [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit) Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-06  0:18                       ` [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-06  0:45                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-06  1:02                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-06  0:17                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-06  0:28                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-06  0:36                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-04 15:57     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 16:45       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 21:21         ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 21:40           ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 21:41             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-04 21:46               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 21:54                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-05  7:46                   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 11:27                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-10-05 14:58                       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-06  7:44                         ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: pre mapping page table to make xen happy Yinghai Lu
2012-10-06  7:44                           ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: get early page table from BRK Yinghai Lu
2012-10-08 12:09                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-10-06  7:44                           ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, mm: Don't clear page table if next range is ram Yinghai Lu
2012-10-09 15:46                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-10  1:00                               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-10 13:41                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-10 14:43                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-06  7:44                           ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, mm: Remove early_memremap workaround for page table accessing Yinghai Lu
2012-10-09 15:48                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-08  6:36                         ` [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 10:47       ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86, mm: Find early page table buffer altogether Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86, mm: Separate out calculate_table_space_size() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86, mm: Move down two calculate_table_space_size down Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86, mm: Set memblock initial limit to 1M Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86: if kernel .text .data .bss are not marked as E820_RAM, complain and fix Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86: Only direct map addresses that are marked as E820_RAM Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30  7:57 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2012-09-30  7:57 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86, mm: Use func pointer to table size calculation and mapping Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1348991844-12285-13-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome