From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/13] x86, mm: Set memblock initial limit to 1M
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 00:57:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348991844-12285-9-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348991844-12285-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
memblock_x86_fill() could double memory array.
If we set max_pfn_mapped to 512M, so memory array could be around 512M.
So kdump will not get big range (like 512M) under 1024M.
Try to put it down under 1M, it could use about 4k or so.
Also we need this one when we try to only map ram range only later.
if the early double the range near 512M, and later init_mem_mapping()
first several range could under 512M, then after mapping get reset,
we will lose access the memblock memory array. but we are using
memblock memory array for iteration.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 249384a..9db2922 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
cleanup_highmap();
- memblock.current_limit = get_max_mapped();
+ memblock.current_limit = ISA_END_ADDRESS;
memblock_x86_fill();
/*
--
1.7.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-30 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-30 7:57 [PATCH -v4 00/13] x86, mm: init_memory_mapping cleanup Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86, mm: Add global page_size_mask and probe one time only Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86, mm: Split out split_mem_range from init_memory_mapping Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86, mm: Move init_memory_mapping calling out of setup.c Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2012-10-01 11:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-10-03 16:51 ` Jacob Shin
2012-10-03 18:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-04 13:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 21:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-04 16:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 16:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 21:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 21:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-05 21:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 21:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-05 21:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 21:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-05 21:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 22:01 ` 896MB address limit (was: Re: [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit) Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-06 0:18 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-06 0:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-06 1:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-06 0:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-06 0:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-10-06 0:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-04 15:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 16:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-04 21:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 21:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 21:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-04 21:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-04 21:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-05 7:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 11:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-10-05 14:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-06 7:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: pre mapping page table to make xen happy Yinghai Lu
2012-10-06 7:44 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: get early page table from BRK Yinghai Lu
2012-10-08 12:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-10-06 7:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, mm: Don't clear page table if next range is ram Yinghai Lu
2012-10-09 15:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-10 1:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-10 13:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-10 14:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-06 7:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, mm: Remove early_memremap workaround for page table accessing Yinghai Lu
2012-10-09 15:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-10-08 6:36 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2012-10-05 10:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86, mm: Find early page table buffer altogether Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86, mm: Separate out calculate_table_space_size() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86, mm: Move down two calculate_table_space_size down Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86: if kernel .text .data .bss are not marked as E820_RAM, complain and fix Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86: Fixup code testing if a pfn is direct mapped Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86: Only direct map addresses that are marked as E820_RAM Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/mm: calculate_table_space_size based on memory ranges that are being mapped Yinghai Lu
2012-09-30 7:57 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86, mm: Use func pointer to table size calculation and mapping Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348991844-12285-9-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome