From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, <lrg@ti.com>
Cc: <sameo@linux.intel.com>, <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/4] regulator: tps65090: rename driver name and regulator name
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:19:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349776142-6409-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349776142-6409-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To make the names proper and more appropriate:
Rename the driver name from tps65090-regulator to tps65090-pmic.
Rename the regulators from TPS65090_ID_* to TPS65090_REGULATOR_*
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
---
Changes from V1:
Make this as patch2 from older patch1.
drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 16 ++++++++--------
include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
index 5f7f931..584a185 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ops = {
{ \
.name = "TPS65090_RAILS"#_id, \
.supply_name = _sname, \
- .id = TPS65090_ID_##_id, \
+ .id = TPS65090_REGULATOR_##_id, \
.ops = &_ops, \
.enable_reg = _en_reg, \
.enable_mask = BIT(0), \
@@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ static struct regulator_desc tps65090_regulator_desc[] = {
static inline bool is_dcdc(int id)
{
switch (id) {
- case TPS65090_ID_DCDC1:
- case TPS65090_ID_DCDC2:
- case TPS65090_ID_DCDC3:
+ case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC1:
+ case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC2:
+ case TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC3:
return true;
default:
return false;
@@ -133,14 +133,14 @@ static int __devinit tps65090_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -EINVAL;
}
- pmic = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, TPS65090_ID_MAX * sizeof(*pmic),
+ pmic = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX * sizeof(*pmic),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmic) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "mem alloc for pmic failed\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
- for (num = 0; num < TPS65090_ID_MAX; num++) {
+ for (num = 0; num < TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX; num++) {
tps_pdata = tps65090_pdata->reg_pdata[num];
ri = &pmic[num];
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static int __devexit tps65090_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct tps65090_regulator *ri;
int num;
- for (num = 0; num < TPS65090_ID_MAX; ++num) {
+ for (num = 0; num < TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX; ++num) {
ri = &pmic[num];
regulator_unregister(ri->rdev);
}
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static int __devexit tps65090_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static struct platform_driver tps65090_regulator_driver = {
.driver = {
- .name = "tps65090-regulator",
+ .name = "tps65090-pmic",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
.probe = tps65090_regulator_probe,
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h
index d06c633..958bf15 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65090.h
@@ -26,19 +26,19 @@
/* TPS65090 Regulator ID */
enum {
- TPS65090_ID_DCDC1,
- TPS65090_ID_DCDC2,
- TPS65090_ID_DCDC3,
- TPS65090_ID_FET1,
- TPS65090_ID_FET2,
- TPS65090_ID_FET3,
- TPS65090_ID_FET4,
- TPS65090_ID_FET5,
- TPS65090_ID_FET6,
- TPS65090_ID_FET7,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC1,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC2,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_DCDC3,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET1,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET2,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET3,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET4,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET5,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET6,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_FET7,
/* Last entry for maximum ID */
- TPS65090_ID_MAX,
+ TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX,
};
struct tps65090 {
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct tps65090_platform_data {
int irq_base;
int num_subdevs;
struct tps65090_subdev_info *subdevs;
- struct tps65090_regulator_plat_data *reg_pdata[TPS65090_ID_MAX];
+ struct tps65090_regulator_plat_data *reg_pdata[TPS65090_REGULATOR_MAX];
};
/*
--
1.7.1.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-09 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-09 9:48 [PATCH V2 0/4] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 9:48 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] regulator; tps65090: Register all regulators in single probe call Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 9:49 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2012-10-09 9:49 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] regulator: tps65090: Add support for LDO regulators Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 9:49 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 10:33 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-10-09 10:02 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 11:11 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-10-09 11:13 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-10-09 10:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-10-09 16:21 ` Stephen Warren
2012-10-17 13:21 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] regulator: tps65090: fix regulator registration and add external control support Mark Brown
2012-10-17 13:33 ` Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349776142-6409-3-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vbyravarasu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome