From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: rjw@sisk.pl, oleg@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] freezer: add missing mb's to freezer_count() and freezer_should_skip()
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:28:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350426526-14254-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350426526-14254-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
A task is considered frozen enough between freezer_do_not_count() and
freezer_count() and freezers use freezer_should_skip() to test this
condition. This supposedly works because freezer_count() always calls
try_to_freezer() after clearing %PF_FREEZER_SKIP.
However, there currently is nothing which guarantees that
freezer_count() sees %true freezing() after clearing %PF_FREEZER_SKIP
when freezing is in progress, and vice-versa. A task can escape the
freezing condition in effect by freezer_count() seeing !freezing() and
freezer_should_skip() seeing %PF_FREEZER_SKIP.
This patch adds smp_mb()'s to freezer_count() and
freezer_should_skip() such that either %true freezing() is visible to
freezer_count() or !PF_FREEZER_SKIP is visible to
freezer_should_skip().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
include/linux/freezer.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/freezer.h b/include/linux/freezer.h
index d09af4b..ee89932 100644
--- a/include/linux/freezer.h
+++ b/include/linux/freezer.h
@@ -75,28 +75,62 @@ static inline bool cgroup_freezing(struct task_struct *task)
*/
-/* Tell the freezer not to count the current task as freezable. */
+/**
+ * freezer_do_not_count - tell freezer to ignore %current
+ *
+ * Tell freezers to ignore the current task when determining whether the
+ * target frozen state is reached. IOW, the current task will be
+ * considered frozen enough by freezers.
+ *
+ * The caller shouldn't do anything which isn't allowed for a frozen task
+ * until freezer_cont() is called. Usually, freezer[_do_not]_count() pair
+ * wrap a scheduling operation and nothing much else.
+ */
static inline void freezer_do_not_count(void)
{
current->flags |= PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
}
-/*
- * Tell the freezer to count the current task as freezable again and try to
- * freeze it.
+/**
+ * freezer_count - tell freezer to stop ignoring %current
+ *
+ * Undo freezer_do_not_count(). It tells freezers that %current should be
+ * considered again and tries to freeze if freezing condition is already in
+ * effect.
*/
static inline void freezer_count(void)
{
current->flags &= ~PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
+ /*
+ * If freezing is in progress, the following paired with smp_mb()
+ * in freezer_should_skip() ensures that either we see %true
+ * freezing() or freezer_should_skip() sees !PF_FREEZER_SKIP.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
try_to_freeze();
}
-/*
- * Check if the task should be counted as freezable by the freezer
+/**
+ * freezer_should_skip - whether to skip a task when determining frozen
+ * state is reached
+ * @p: task in quesion
+ *
+ * This function is used by freezers after establishing %true freezing() to
+ * test whether a task should be skipped when determining the target frozen
+ * state is reached. IOW, if this function returns %true, @p is considered
+ * frozen enough.
*/
-static inline int freezer_should_skip(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline bool freezer_should_skip(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return !!(p->flags & PF_FREEZER_SKIP);
+ /*
+ * The following smp_mb() paired with the one in freezer_count()
+ * ensures that either freezer_count() sees %true freezing() or we
+ * see cleared %PF_FREEZER_SKIP and return %false. This makes it
+ * impossible for a task to slip frozen state testing after
+ * clearing %PF_FREEZER_SKIP.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ return p->flags & PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
}
/*
--
1.7.7.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-16 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 22:28 [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cgroup_freezer: allow migration regardless of freezer state and update locking Tejun Heo
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] cgroup: cgroup_subsys->fork() should be called after the task is added to css_set Tejun Heo
2012-10-17 8:28 ` Li Zefan
2012-10-18 1:25 ` Li Zefan
2012-10-21 19:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-21 19:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-22 18:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 21:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-20 5:25 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2012-12-28 21:22 ` [PATCH] cgroup: remove unused dummy cgroup_fork_callbacks() Tejun Heo
2012-10-16 22:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-10-22 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] freezer: add missing mb's to freezer_count() and freezer_should_skip() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 21:13 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 15:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 18:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 16:39 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: freezer: add missing mb's to freezer_count() and freezer_should_skip()) Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 16:39 ` [PATCH 1/1] freezer: change ptrace_stop/do_signal_stop to use freezable_schedule() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:18 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:36 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-26 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 17:52 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-26 18:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-26 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-26 21:29 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-28 0:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-27 22:22 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-28 13:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] cgroup_freezer: make it official that writes to freezer.state don't fail Tejun Heo
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] cgroup_freezer: don't stall transition to FROZEN for PF_NOFREEZE or PF_FREEZER_SKIP tasks Tejun Heo
2012-10-22 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 21:18 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 15:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 19:06 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 17:12 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: cgroup_freezer: don't stall transition to FROZEN for PF_NOFREEZE or PF_FREEZER_SKIP tasks) Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/1] freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 17:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] cgroup_freezer: allow moving tasks in and out of a frozen cgroup Tejun Heo
2012-10-22 19:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 21:25 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 16:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] cgroup_freezer: prepare update_if_frozen() for locking change Tejun Heo
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] cgroup_freezer: don't use cgroup_lock_live_group() Tejun Heo
2012-10-17 19:16 ` [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cgroup_freezer: allow migration regardless of freezer state and update locking Matt Helsley
2012-10-18 21:14 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-18 22:21 ` Matt Helsley
2012-10-18 22:35 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-18 23:47 ` Matt Helsley
2012-10-19 0:01 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-19 1:29 ` Matt Helsley
2012-10-19 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-19 16:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-19 20:04 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-21 19:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-21 19:24 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350426526-14254-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome