mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <rjw@sisk.pl>, <oleg@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] cgroup: cgroup_subsys->fork() should be called after the task is added to css_set
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:25:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507F5A81.7010007@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507E6C4B.6000704@huawei.com>

于 2012/10/17 16:28, Li Zefan 写道:
> On 2012/10/17 6:28, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> cgroup core has a bug which violates a basic rule about event
>> notifications - when a new entity needs to be added, you add that to
>> the notification list first and then make the new entity conform to
>> the current state.  If done in the reverse order, an event happening
>> inbetween will be lost.
>>
>> cgroup_subsys->fork() is invoked way before the new task is added to
>> the css_set.  Currently, cgroup_freezer is the only user of ->fork()
>> and uses it to make new tasks conform to the current state of the
>> freezer.  If FROZEN state is requested while fork is in progress
>> between cgroup_fork_callbacks() and cgroup_post_fork(), the child
>> could escape freezing - the cgroup isn't frozen when ->fork() is
>> called and the freezer couldn't see the new task on the css_set.
>>
>> This patch moves cgroup_subsys->fork() invocation to
>> cgroup_post_fork() after the new task is added to the css_set.
>> cgroup_fork_callbacks() is removed.
>>
>> Because now a task may be migrated during cgroup_subsys->fork(),
>> freezer_fork() is updated so that it adheres to the usual RCU locking
>> and the rather pointless comment on why locking can be different there
>> is removed (if it doesn't make anything simpler, why even bother?).
>>
> 
> I don't think rcu read section is sufficient. It guarantees the data you're
> accessing is valid, but the data can be new or can be old.
> 
> So a case below is possible:
> 
> in freezer_fork():
> rcu_read_lock();
> freezer = task_freezer(task);
>                                   move task from freezer to freezer2
>                                   which is in FREEZING/FROZEN state
> freezer is in THAWED state,
> nothing to do.
> rcu_read_unlock();
> 

forget about it. The task will be correctly frozen when moving to
another cgroup, so nothing unexpected will happen.

for this patch:

Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-16 22:28 [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cgroup_freezer: allow migration regardless of freezer state and update locking Tejun Heo
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] cgroup: cgroup_subsys->fork() should be called after the task is added to css_set Tejun Heo
2012-10-17  8:28   ` Li Zefan
2012-10-18  1:25     ` Li Zefan [this message]
2012-10-21 19:11   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-21 19:22     ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-22 18:04       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 21:16         ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 15:51           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 19:04             ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 17:42               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-12-20  5:25   ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2012-12-28 21:22     ` [PATCH] cgroup: remove unused dummy cgroup_fork_callbacks() Tejun Heo
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] freezer: add missing mb's to freezer_count() and freezer_should_skip() Tejun Heo
2012-10-22 17:44   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 21:13     ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 15:39       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 18:57         ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 16:39           ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: freezer: add missing mb's to freezer_count() and freezer_should_skip()) Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 16:39             ` [PATCH 1/1] freezer: change ptrace_stop/do_signal_stop to use freezable_schedule() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:18               ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 17:34                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:36                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-26 17:45                     ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 17:46                       ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 17:52                         ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-26 18:01                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-26 21:14                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-26 21:29                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-26 21:29                                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-28  0:16                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-27 22:22                         ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-28 13:45                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] cgroup_freezer: make it official that writes to freezer.state don't fail Tejun Heo
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] cgroup_freezer: don't stall transition to FROZEN for PF_NOFREEZE or PF_FREEZER_SKIP tasks Tejun Heo
2012-10-22 18:34   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 21:18     ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 15:55       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-24 19:06         ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 17:12           ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: cgroup_freezer: don't stall transition to FROZEN for PF_NOFREEZE or PF_FREEZER_SKIP tasks) Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:12             ` [PATCH 1/1] freezer: exec should clear PF_NOFREEZE along with PF_KTHREAD Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:20               ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 17:37                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-25 17:37                   ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-25 20:13                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] cgroup_freezer: allow moving tasks in and out of a frozen cgroup Tejun Heo
2012-10-22 19:25   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-22 21:25     ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-23 16:14       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] cgroup_freezer: prepare update_if_frozen() for locking change Tejun Heo
2012-10-16 22:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] cgroup_freezer: don't use cgroup_lock_live_group() Tejun Heo
2012-10-17 19:16 ` [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.8] cgroup_freezer: allow migration regardless of freezer state and update locking Matt Helsley
2012-10-18 21:14   ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-18 22:21     ` Matt Helsley
2012-10-18 22:35       ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-18 23:47         ` Matt Helsley
2012-10-19  0:01           ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-19  1:29             ` Matt Helsley
2012-10-19 20:02               ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-19 16:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-10-19 20:04   ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-21 19:18     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-21 19:24       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507F5A81.7010007@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome