From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, bp@amd64.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
miaox@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] Do not change worker's running cpu in cmci_rediscover().
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:45:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350625528-1385-3-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350625528-1385-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
cmci_rediscover() used set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to change the current process's
running cpu, and migrate itself to the dest cpu. But worker processes are not
allowed to be migrated. If current is a worker, the worker will be migrated to
another cpu, but the corresponding worker_pool is still on the original cpu.
In this case, the following BUG_ON in try_to_wake_up_local() will be triggered:
BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());
This will cause the kernel panic.
This patch removes the set_cpus_allowed_ptr() call, and put the cmci rediscover
jobs onto all the other cpus using system_wq. This could bring some delay for
the jobs.
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
index 481d152..d8f0da6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
@@ -163,34 +163,38 @@ void cmci_clear(void)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
}
+static long cmci_rediscover_work_func(void *arg)
+{
+ int banks;
+
+ /* Recheck banks in case CPUs don't all have the same */
+ if (cmci_supported(&banks))
+ cmci_discover(banks, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* After a CPU went down cycle through all the others and rediscover
* Must run in process context.
*/
void cmci_rediscover(int dying)
{
- int banks;
- int cpu;
- cpumask_var_t old;
+ int cpu, banks;
if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
return;
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&old, GFP_KERNEL))
- return;
- cpumask_copy(old, ¤t->cpus_allowed);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu == dying);
- if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu)))
+ if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
+ cmci_rediscover_work_func(NULL);
continue;
- /* Recheck banks in case CPUs don't all have the same */
- if (cmci_supported(&banks))
- cmci_discover(banks, 0);
- }
+ }
- set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, old);
- free_cpumask_var(old);
+ work_on_cpu(cpu, cmci_rediscover_work_func, NULL);
+ }
}
/*
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 5:45 [PATCH v2 0/2] " Tang Chen
2012-10-19 5:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Replace if statement with WARN_ON_ONCE() " Tang Chen
2012-10-19 14:07 ` Greg KH
2012-10-19 16:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-22 2:10 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-22 10:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-23 1:35 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-23 2:55 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-23 9:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-23 10:17 ` Miao Xie
2012-10-23 10:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-23 10:34 ` Miao Xie
2012-10-23 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-23 11:30 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-23 14:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-23 16:16 ` Luck, Tony
2012-10-24 1:31 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-19 5:45 ` Tang Chen [this message]
2012-10-19 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Do not change worker's running cpu " Borislav Petkov
2012-10-19 17:21 ` Luck, Tony
2012-10-22 3:33 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-22 10:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-10-23 1:30 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-19 7:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Tang Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350625528-1385-3-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®