From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
sbw@mit.edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Remove restrictions on no-CBs CPUs
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:36:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363642610-21390-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130318213608.GA20296@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Currently, CPU 0 is constrained to not be a no-CBs CPU, and furthermore
at least one no-CBs CPU must remain online at any given time. These
restrictions are problematic in some situations, such as cases where
all CPUs must run a real-time workload that needs to be insulated from
OS jitter and latencies due to RCU callback invocation. This commit
therefore provides no-CBs CPUs a (very crude and energy-inefficient)
way to start and to wait for grace periods independently of the normal
RCU callback mechanisms. This approach allows any or all of the CPUs to
be designated as no-CBs CPUs, and allows any proper subset of the CPUs
(whether no-CBs CPUs or not) to be offlined.
This commit also provides a fix for a locking bug spotted by Xie
ChanglongX <changlongx.xie@intel.com>.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
init/Kconfig | 4 +-
kernel/rcutree.c | 14 ++---
kernel/rcutree.h | 12 +---
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 156 ++++++++++++++----------------------------------
4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 22616cd..c8bd349 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ config RCU_BOOST_DELAY
Accept the default if unsure.
config RCU_NOCB_CPU
- bool "Offload RCU callback processing from boot-selected CPUs"
+ bool "Offload RCU callback processing from boot-selected CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL"
depends on TREE_RCU || TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
default n
help
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ config RCU_NOCB_CPU
callback, and (2) affinity or cgroups can be used to force
the kthreads to run on whatever set of CPUs is desired.
- Say Y here if you want reduced OS jitter on selected CPUs.
+ Say Y here if you want to help to debug reduced OS jitter.
Say N here if you are unsure.
endmenu # "RCU Subsystem"
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 5b8ad82..6ad0716 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -310,6 +310,8 @@ cpu_needs_another_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp))
return 0; /* No, a grace period is already in progress. */
+ if (rcu_nocb_needs_gp(rdp))
+ return 1; /* Yes, a no-CBs CPU needs one. */
if (!rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL])
return 0; /* No, this is a no-CBs (or offline) CPU. */
if (*rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL])
@@ -1035,10 +1037,11 @@ static void init_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
int i;
+ if (init_nocb_callback_list(rdp))
+ return;
rdp->nxtlist = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < RCU_NEXT_SIZE; i++)
rdp->nxttail[i] = &rdp->nxtlist;
- init_nocb_callback_list(rdp);
}
/*
@@ -2909,7 +2912,6 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state->rda, cpu);
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
struct rcu_state *rsp;
- int ret = NOTIFY_OK;
trace_rcu_utilization("Start CPU hotplug");
switch (action) {
@@ -2923,10 +2925,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1);
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
- if (nocb_cpu_expendable(cpu))
- rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, cpu);
- else
- ret = NOTIFY_BAD;
+ rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, cpu);
break;
case CPU_DYING:
case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
@@ -2950,7 +2949,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
break;
}
trace_rcu_utilization("End CPU hotplug");
- return ret;
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
}
/*
@@ -3170,7 +3169,6 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
rcu_init_one(&rcu_sched_state, &rcu_sched_data);
rcu_init_one(&rcu_bh_state, &rcu_bh_data);
__rcu_init_preempt();
- rcu_init_nocb();
open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
/*
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index c896b50..7af39f4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
int nocb_p_count_lazy; /* (approximate). */
wait_queue_head_t nocb_wq; /* For nocb kthreads to sleep on. */
struct task_struct *nocb_kthread;
+ bool nocb_needs_gp;
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
int cpu;
@@ -375,12 +376,6 @@ struct rcu_state {
struct rcu_data __percpu *rda; /* pointer of percu rcu_data. */
void (*call)(struct rcu_head *head, /* call_rcu() flavor. */
void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
- void (*call_remote)(struct rcu_head *head,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
- /* call_rcu() flavor, but for */
- /* placing on remote CPU. */
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
/* The following fields are guarded by the root rcu_node's lock. */
@@ -529,16 +524,15 @@ static void print_cpu_stall_info(struct rcu_state *rsp, int cpu);
static void print_cpu_stall_info_end(void);
static void zero_cpu_stall_ticks(struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void increment_cpu_stall_ticks(void);
+static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp);
static bool is_nocb_cpu(int cpu);
static bool __call_rcu_nocb(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
bool lazy);
static bool rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp,
struct rcu_data *rdp);
-static bool nocb_cpu_expendable(int cpu);
static void rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp);
-static void init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp);
-static void __init rcu_init_nocb(void);
+static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp);
#endif /* #ifndef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index c1cc7e1..44f958a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -86,10 +86,6 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void)
printk(KERN_INFO "\tRCU restricting CPUs from NR_CPUS=%d to nr_cpu_ids=%d.\n", NR_CPUS, nr_cpu_ids);
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
if (have_rcu_nocb_mask) {
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(0, rcu_nocb_mask)) {
- cpumask_clear_cpu(0, rcu_nocb_mask);
- pr_info("\tCPU 0: illegal no-CBs CPU (cleared).\n");
- }
cpulist_scnprintf(nocb_buf, sizeof(nocb_buf), rcu_nocb_mask);
pr_info("\tExperimental no-CBs CPUs: %s.\n", nocb_buf);
if (rcu_nocb_poll)
@@ -2165,6 +2161,14 @@ static int __init parse_rcu_nocb_poll(char *arg)
}
early_param("rcu_nocb_poll", parse_rcu_nocb_poll);
+/*
+ * Does this CPU needs a grace period due to offloaded callbacks?
+ */
+static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+{
+ return rdp->nocb_needs_gp;
+}
+
/* Is the specified CPU a no-CPUs CPU? */
static bool is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
{
@@ -2265,95 +2269,39 @@ static bool __maybe_unused rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp,
}
/*
- * There must be at least one non-no-CBs CPU in operation at any given
- * time, because no-CBs CPUs are not capable of initiating grace periods
- * independently. This function therefore complains if the specified
- * CPU is the last non-no-CBs CPU, allowing the CPU-hotplug system to
- * avoid offlining the last such CPU. (Recursion is a wonderful thing,
- * but you have to have a base case!)
+ * If necessary, kick off a new grace period, and either way wait
+ * for a subsequent grace period to complete.
*/
-static bool nocb_cpu_expendable(int cpu)
+static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
- cpumask_var_t non_nocb_cpus;
- int ret;
+ unsigned long c;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long j;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ c = rnp->completed + 2;
+ rdp->nocb_needs_gp = true;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
/*
- * If there are no no-CB CPUs or if this CPU is not a no-CB CPU,
- * then offlining this CPU is harmless. Let it happen.
+ * Wait for the grace period. Do so interruptibly to avoid messing
+ * up the load average.
*/
- if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask || is_nocb_cpu(cpu))
- return 1;
-
- /* If no memory, play it safe and keep the CPU around. */
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&non_nocb_cpus, GFP_NOIO))
- return 0;
- cpumask_andnot(non_nocb_cpus, cpu_online_mask, rcu_nocb_mask);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, non_nocb_cpus);
- ret = !cpumask_empty(non_nocb_cpus);
- free_cpumask_var(non_nocb_cpus);
- return ret;
-}
-
-/*
- * Helper structure for remote registry of RCU callbacks.
- * This is needed for when a no-CBs CPU needs to start a grace period.
- * If it just invokes call_rcu(), the resulting callback will be queued,
- * which can result in deadlock.
- */
-struct rcu_head_remote {
- struct rcu_head *rhp;
- call_rcu_func_t *crf;
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rhp);
-};
-
-/*
- * Register a callback as specified by the rcu_head_remote struct.
- * This function is intended to be invoked via smp_call_function_single().
- */
-static void call_rcu_local(void *arg)
-{
- struct rcu_head_remote *rhrp =
- container_of(arg, struct rcu_head_remote, rhp);
-
- rhrp->crf(rhrp->rhp, rhrp->func);
-}
-
-/*
- * Set up an rcu_head_remote structure and the invoke call_rcu_local()
- * on CPU 0 (which is guaranteed to be a non-no-CBs CPU) via
- * smp_call_function_single().
- */
-static void invoke_crf_remote(struct rcu_head *rhp,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rhp),
- call_rcu_func_t crf)
-{
- struct rcu_head_remote rhr;
-
- rhr.rhp = rhp;
- rhr.crf = crf;
- rhr.func = func;
- smp_call_function_single(0, call_rcu_local, &rhr, 1);
-}
-
-/*
- * Helper functions to be passed to wait_rcu_gp(), each of which
- * invokes invoke_crf_remote() to register a callback appropriately.
- */
-static void __maybe_unused
-call_rcu_preempt_remote(struct rcu_head *rhp,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rhp))
-{
- invoke_crf_remote(rhp, func, call_rcu);
-}
-static void call_rcu_bh_remote(struct rcu_head *rhp,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rhp))
-{
- invoke_crf_remote(rhp, func, call_rcu_bh);
-}
-static void call_rcu_sched_remote(struct rcu_head *rhp,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rhp))
-{
- invoke_crf_remote(rhp, func, call_rcu_sched);
+ for (;;) {
+ j = jiffies;
+ schedule_timeout_interruptible(2);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp->completed, c)) {
+ rdp->nocb_needs_gp = false;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (j == jiffies)
+ flush_signals(current);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
+ }
+ smp_mb(); /* Ensure that CB invocation happens after GP end. */
}
/*
@@ -2390,7 +2338,7 @@ static int rcu_nocb_kthread(void *arg)
cl = atomic_long_xchg(&rdp->nocb_q_count_lazy, 0);
ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->nocb_p_count) += c;
ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->nocb_p_count_lazy) += cl;
- wait_rcu_gp(rdp->rsp->call_remote);
+ rcu_nocb_wait_gp(rdp);
/* Each pass through the following loop invokes a callback. */
trace_rcu_batch_start(rdp->rsp->name, cl, c, -1);
@@ -2443,26 +2391,22 @@ static void __init rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
}
/* Prevent __call_rcu() from enqueuing callbacks on no-CBs CPUs */
-static void init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL ||
!cpumask_test_cpu(rdp->cpu, rcu_nocb_mask))
- return;
+ return false;
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = NULL;
+ return true;
}
-/* Initialize the ->call_remote fields in the rcu_state structures. */
-static void __init rcu_init_nocb(void)
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
+
+static int rcu_nocb_needs_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
- rcu_preempt_state.call_remote = call_rcu_preempt_remote;
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
- rcu_bh_state.call_remote = call_rcu_bh_remote;
- rcu_sched_state.call_remote = call_rcu_sched_remote;
+ return 0;
}
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
-
static bool is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
{
return false;
@@ -2480,11 +2424,6 @@ static bool __maybe_unused rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp,
return 0;
}
-static bool nocb_cpu_expendable(int cpu)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-
static void __init rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
}
@@ -2493,12 +2432,9 @@ static void __init rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
}
-static void init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
-{
-}
-
-static void __init rcu_init_nocb(void)
+static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
+ return false;
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-18 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 21:36 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] v3 RCU idle/no-CB changes for 3.10 Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Provide compile-time control for no-CBs CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Introduce proper blocking to no-CBs kthreads GP waits Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Add event tracing for no-CBs CPUs' callback registration Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Add event tracing for no-CBs CPUs' grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Distinguish "rcuo" kthreads by RCU flavor Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Export RCU_FAST_NO_HZ parameters to sysfs Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] rcu: Accelerate RCU callbacks at grace-period end Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] rcu: Make RCU_FAST_NO_HZ take advantage of numbered callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Rearrange locking in rcu_start_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Repurpose no-CBs event tracing to future-GP events Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcu: Push lock release to rcu_start_gp()'s callers Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Rename n_nocb_gp_requests to need_future_gp Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu: Abstract rcu_start_future_gp() from rcu_nocb_wait_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: Make rcu_accelerate_cbs() note need for future grace periods Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363642610-21390-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®