From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
sbw@mit.edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Add event tracing for no-CBs CPUs' grace periods
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:36:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363642610-21390-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363642610-21390-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/trace/events/rcu.h | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rcu.h b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
index 1918e83..cdfed6d 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rcu.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
@@ -72,6 +72,58 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_grace_period,
);
/*
+ * Tracepoint for no-callbacks grace-period events. The caller should
+ * pull the data from the rcu_node structure, other than rcuname, which
+ * comes from the rcu_state structure, and event, which is one of the
+ * following:
+ *
+ * "Startleaf": Request a nocb grace period based on leaf-node data.
+ * "Startedleaf": Leaf-node start proved sufficient.
+ * "Startedleafroot": Leaf-node start proved sufficient after checking root.
+ * "Startedroot": Requested a nocb grace period based on root-node data.
+ * "StartWait": Start waiting for the requested grace period.
+ * "ResumeWait": Resume waiting after signal.
+ * "EndWait": Complete wait.
+ * "Cleanup": Clean up rcu_node structure after previous GP.
+ * "CleanupMore": Clean up, and another no-CB GP is needed.
+ */
+TRACE_EVENT(rcu_nocb_grace_period,
+
+ TP_PROTO(char *rcuname, unsigned long gpnum, unsigned long completed,
+ unsigned long c, u8 level, int grplo, int grphi,
+ char *gpevent),
+
+ TP_ARGS(rcuname, gpnum, completed, c, level, grplo, grphi, gpevent),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(char *, rcuname)
+ __field(unsigned long, gpnum)
+ __field(unsigned long, completed)
+ __field(unsigned long, c)
+ __field(u8, level)
+ __field(int, grplo)
+ __field(int, grphi)
+ __field(char *, gpevent)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->rcuname = rcuname;
+ __entry->gpnum = gpnum;
+ __entry->completed = completed;
+ __entry->c = c;
+ __entry->level = level;
+ __entry->grplo = grplo;
+ __entry->grphi = grphi;
+ __entry->gpevent = gpevent;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("%s %lu %lu %lu %u %d %d %s",
+ __entry->rcuname, __entry->gpnum, __entry->completed,
+ __entry->c, __entry->level, __entry->grplo, __entry->grphi,
+ __entry->gpevent)
+);
+
+/*
* Tracepoint for grace-period-initialization events. These are
* distinguished by the type of RCU, the new grace-period number, the
* rcu_node structure level, the starting and ending CPU covered by the
@@ -601,6 +653,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rcu_barrier,
#define trace_rcu_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, gpevent) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rcuname, gpnum, level, grplo, grphi, \
qsmask) do { } while (0)
+#define trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rcuname, gpnum, completed, c, \
+ level, grplo, grphi, event) \
+ do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_preempt_task(rcuname, pid, gpnum) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_unlock_preempted_task(rcuname, gpnum, pid) do { } while (0)
#define trace_rcu_quiescent_state_report(rcuname, gpnum, mask, qsmask, level, \
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 7225a5a..e32236e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -2201,6 +2201,9 @@ static int rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
wake_up_all(&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1]);
rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1] = 0;
needmore = rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[(c + 1) & 0x1];
+ trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
+ c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ needmore ? "CleanupMore" : "Cleanup");
return needmore;
}
@@ -2347,6 +2350,9 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
/* Count our request for a grace period. */
rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++;
+ trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
+ c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ "Startleaf");
if (rnp->gpnum != rnp->completed) {
@@ -2355,6 +2361,10 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
* is in progress, so we are done. When this grace
* period ends, our request will be acted upon.
*/
+ trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
+ rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed, c,
+ rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ "Startedleaf");
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
} else {
@@ -2366,6 +2376,11 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
if (rnp != rnp_root)
raw_spin_lock(&rnp_root->lock); /* irqs disabled. */
if (rnp_root->gpnum != rnp_root->completed) {
+ trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
+ rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
+ c, rnp->level,
+ rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ "Startedleafroot");
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_root->lock); /* irqs disabled. */
} else {
@@ -2381,6 +2396,11 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
c = rnp_root->completed + 1;
rnp->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++;
rnp_root->n_nocb_gp_requests[c & 0x1]++;
+ trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
+ rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
+ c, rnp->level,
+ rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ "Startedroot");
local_save_flags(flags1);
rcu_start_gp(rdp->rsp, flags1); /* Rlses ->lock. */
}
@@ -2396,6 +2416,9 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
* Wait for the grace period. Do so interruptibly to avoid messing
* up the load average.
*/
+ trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
+ c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ "StartWait");
for (;;) {
wait_event_interruptible(
rnp->nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1],
@@ -2403,7 +2426,14 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
if (likely(d))
break;
flush_signals(current);
+ trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name,
+ rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed, c,
+ rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ "ResumeWait");
}
+ trace_rcu_nocb_grace_period(rdp->rsp->name, rnp->gpnum, rnp->completed,
+ c, rnp->level, rnp->grplo, rnp->grphi,
+ "EndWait");
smp_mb(); /* Ensure that CB invocation happens after GP end. */
}
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-18 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-18 21:36 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] v3 RCU idle/no-CB changes for 3.10 Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Remove restrictions on no-CBs CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Provide compile-time control for " Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Introduce proper blocking to no-CBs kthreads GP waits Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Add event tracing for no-CBs CPUs' callback registration Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Distinguish "rcuo" kthreads by RCU flavor Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Export RCU_FAST_NO_HZ parameters to sysfs Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] rcu: Accelerate RCU callbacks at grace-period end Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] rcu: Make RCU_FAST_NO_HZ take advantage of numbered callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Rearrange locking in rcu_start_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Repurpose no-CBs event tracing to future-GP events Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcu: Push lock release to rcu_start_gp()'s callers Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Rename n_nocb_gp_requests to need_future_gp Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu: Abstract rcu_start_future_gp() from rcu_nocb_wait_gp() Paul E. McKenney
2013-03-18 21:36 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: Make rcu_accelerate_cbs() note need for future grace periods Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363642610-21390-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®