From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/21] workqueue: remove unused pwq_lock
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 03:28:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363721306-2030-14-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363721306-2030-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
all first_pwq() and for_each_pwq() are converted to be protected by
wq->mutex or RCU_SCHED, so freaky pwq_lock is unused.
simply remove it.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 31 +++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a3460e7..e45f038 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -127,12 +127,9 @@ enum {
*
* PR: pools_mutex protected for writes. Sched-RCU protected for reads.
*
- * PW: pwq_lock protected.
- *
* Q: wq->mutex protected.
*
- * QR: wq->mutex and pwq_lock protected for writes. Sched-RCU
- * protected for reads.
+ * QR: wq->mutex protected for writes. Sched-RCU protected for reads.
*
* MD: wq_mayday_lock protected.
*/
@@ -206,7 +203,7 @@ struct pool_workqueue {
* Release of unbound pwq is punted to system_wq. See put_pwq()
* and pwq_unbound_release_workfn() for details. pool_workqueue
* itself is also sched-RCU protected so that the first pwq can be
- * determined without grabbing pwq_lock.
+ * determined without grabbing wq->mutex.
*/
struct work_struct unbound_release_work;
struct rcu_head rcu;
@@ -260,7 +257,6 @@ static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(wqs_mutex); /* protects workqueues */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(pools_mutex); /* protects pools */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pwq_lock); /* protects pool_workqueues */
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(wq_mayday_lock); /* protects wq->maydays list */
static LIST_HEAD(workqueues); /* QS: list of all workqueues */
@@ -301,11 +297,10 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
lockdep_is_held(&pools_mutex), \
"sched RCU or pools_mutex should be held")
-#define assert_rcu_or_pwq_lock(wq) \
+#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq) \
rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held() || \
- lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) || \
- lockdep_is_held(&pwq_lock), \
- "sched RCU or pwq_lock should be held")
+ lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \
+ "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
#define assert_manager_or_pool_lock(pool) \
@@ -359,7 +354,7 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
* @pwq: iteration cursor
* @wq: the target workqueue
*
- * This must be called either with pwq_lock held or sched RCU read locked.
+ * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or sched RCU read locked.
* If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
* responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
*
@@ -368,7 +363,7 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
*/
#define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) \
list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node) \
- if (({ assert_rcu_or_pwq_lock(wq); false; })) { } \
+ if (({ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq); false; })) { } \
else
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK
@@ -507,13 +502,13 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
* first_pwq - return the first pool_workqueue of the specified workqueue
* @wq: the target workqueue
*
- * This must be called either with pwq_lock held or sched RCU read locked.
+ * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or sched RCU read locked.
* If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
* responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
*/
static struct pool_workqueue *first_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
- assert_rcu_or_pwq_lock(wq);
+ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq);
return list_first_or_null_rcu(&wq->pwqs, struct pool_workqueue,
pwqs_node);
}
@@ -3551,9 +3546,7 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
* and consistent with the linking path.
*/
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- spin_lock_irq(&pwq_lock);
list_del_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node);
- spin_unlock_irq(&pwq_lock);
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
put_unbound_pool(pool);
@@ -3639,9 +3632,7 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
/* link in @pwq */
- spin_lock_irq(&pwq_lock);
list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
- spin_unlock_irq(&pwq_lock);
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
}
@@ -4290,7 +4281,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu);
* pool->worklist.
*
* CONTEXT:
- * Grabs and releases wqs_mutex, pwq_lock and pool->lock's.
+ * Grabs and releases wqs_mutex, wq->mutex and pool->lock's.
*/
void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
{
@@ -4377,7 +4368,7 @@ out_unlock:
* frozen works are transferred to their respective pool worklists.
*
* CONTEXT:
- * Grabs and releases wqs_mutex, pwq_lock and pool->lock's.
+ * Grabs and releases wqs_mutex, wq->mutex and pool->lock's.
*/
void thaw_workqueues(void)
{
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 19:28 [PATCH 00/21] workqueue: cleanups and better locking for recent changes Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 01/21] workqueue: add missing POOL_FREEZING Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:18 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 17:24 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 02/21] workqueue: don't free pool->worker_idr by RCU Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:29 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 03/21] workqueue: simplify current_is_workqueue_rescuer() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 04/21] workqueue: swap the two branches in pwq_adjust_max_active() to get better readability Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:39 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 05/21] workqueue: kick workers in pwq_adjust_max_active() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:56 ` [PATCH] workqueue: kick a worker " Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 06/21] workqueue: separate out pools locking into pools_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:58 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 07/21] workqueue: rename wq_mutex to wqs_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 08/21] workqueue: rename wq->flush_mutex to wq->mutex Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 09/21] workqueue: use wq->mutex to protects ->nr_drainers and __WQ_DRAINING Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 10/21] workqueue: use rcu_read_lock_sched() instead for accessing pwq in RCU Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 11/21] workqueue: also allowed wq->mutex protect for_each_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 12/21] workqueue: use wq->mutex to protect saved_max_active Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 14/21] workqueue: add wq->freezing and remove POOL_FREEZING Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 15/21] workqueue: remove worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:10 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-21 11:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-21 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 16/21] workqueue: rename rebind_workers() to associate_cpu_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 17/21] workqueue: simplify workqueue_cpu_up_callback(CPU_ONLINE) Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:16 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 18/21] workqueue: read POOL_DISASSOCIATED bit under pool->lock Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 19/21] workqueue: remove @p_last_pwq from init_and_link_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 20/21] workqueue: modify wq->freezing only when freezable Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 21/21] workqueue: avoid false negative in assert_manager_or_pool_lock() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:22 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 16:38 ` [PATCH 00/21] workqueue: cleanups and better locking for recent changes Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363721306-2030-14-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®