From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/21] workqueue: swap the two branches in pwq_adjust_max_active() to get better readability
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 03:28:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363721306-2030-5-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363721306-2030-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
"if (!freezable || !(pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING))" is hard to read.
Swap the two branches. it becomes
"if (freezable && (pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING))", it is better.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index e1b31fc..8c882ae 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3592,14 +3592,14 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock);
- if (!freezable || !(pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)) {
+ if (freezable && (pwq->pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)) {
+ pwq->max_active = 0;
+ } else {
pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
while (!list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works) &&
pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)
pwq_activate_first_delayed(pwq);
- } else {
- pwq->max_active = 0;
}
spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock);
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 19:28 [PATCH 00/21] workqueue: cleanups and better locking for recent changes Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 01/21] workqueue: add missing POOL_FREEZING Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:18 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 17:24 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 02/21] workqueue: don't free pool->worker_idr by RCU Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:29 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 03/21] workqueue: simplify current_is_workqueue_rescuer() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2013-03-20 17:39 ` [PATCH 04/21] workqueue: swap the two branches in pwq_adjust_max_active() to get better readability Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 05/21] workqueue: kick workers in pwq_adjust_max_active() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:56 ` [PATCH] workqueue: kick a worker " Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 06/21] workqueue: separate out pools locking into pools_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:58 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 07/21] workqueue: rename wq_mutex to wqs_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 08/21] workqueue: rename wq->flush_mutex to wq->mutex Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 09/21] workqueue: use wq->mutex to protects ->nr_drainers and __WQ_DRAINING Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 10/21] workqueue: use rcu_read_lock_sched() instead for accessing pwq in RCU Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 11/21] workqueue: also allowed wq->mutex protect for_each_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 12/21] workqueue: use wq->mutex to protect saved_max_active Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 13/21] workqueue: remove unused pwq_lock Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 14/21] workqueue: add wq->freezing and remove POOL_FREEZING Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 15/21] workqueue: remove worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:10 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-21 11:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-21 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 16/21] workqueue: rename rebind_workers() to associate_cpu_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 17/21] workqueue: simplify workqueue_cpu_up_callback(CPU_ONLINE) Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:16 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 18/21] workqueue: read POOL_DISASSOCIATED bit under pool->lock Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 19/21] workqueue: remove @p_last_pwq from init_and_link_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 20/21] workqueue: modify wq->freezing only when freezable Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-19 19:28 ` [PATCH 21/21] workqueue: avoid false negative in assert_manager_or_pool_lock() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 18:22 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 16:38 ` [PATCH 00/21] workqueue: cleanups and better locking for recent changes Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363721306-2030-5-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®