From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq()
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:00:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363737629-16745-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363737629-16745-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Break init_and_link_pwq() into init_pwq() and link_pwq() and move
unbound-workqueue specific handling into apply_workqueue_attrs().
Also, factor out unbound pool and pool_workqueue allocation into
alloc_unbound_pwq().
This reorganization is to prepare for NUMA affinity and doesn't
introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 3f820a5..bbbfc92 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3647,13 +3647,10 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock);
}
-static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
- struct workqueue_struct *wq,
- struct worker_pool *pool,
- struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
+static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ struct worker_pool *pool)
{
- int node;
-
BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
pwq->pool = pool;
@@ -3663,9 +3660,16 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->delayed_works);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->mayday_node);
INIT_WORK(&pwq->unbound_release_work, pwq_unbound_release_workfn);
+}
- mutex_lock(&wq->flush_mutex);
- spin_lock_irq(&pwq_lock);
+/* sync @pwq with the current state of its associated wq and link it */
+static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+ struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq->flush_mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&pwq_lock);
/*
* Set the matching work_color. This is synchronized with
@@ -3680,15 +3684,27 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
/* link in @pwq */
list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
+}
- if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
- copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pool->attrs);
- for_each_node(node)
- rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+/* obtain a pool matching @attr and create a pwq associating the pool and @wq */
+static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
+{
+ struct worker_pool *pool;
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+
+ pool = get_unbound_pool(attrs);
+ if (!pool)
+ return NULL;
+
+ pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pwq) {
+ put_unbound_pool(pool);
+ return NULL;
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&pwq_lock);
- mutex_unlock(&wq->flush_mutex);
+ init_pwq(pwq, wq, pool);
+ return pwq;
}
/**
@@ -3709,7 +3725,7 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
struct pool_workqueue *pwq, *last_pwq;
- struct worker_pool *pool;
+ int node;
/* only unbound workqueues can change attributes */
if (WARN_ON(!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)))
@@ -3719,17 +3735,22 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
if (WARN_ON((wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) && !list_empty(&wq->pwqs)))
return -EINVAL;
- pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, attrs);
if (!pwq)
return -ENOMEM;
- pool = get_unbound_pool(attrs);
- if (!pool) {
- kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ mutex_lock(&wq->flush_mutex);
+ spin_lock_irq(&pwq_lock);
+
+ link_pwq(pwq, &last_pwq);
+
+ copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pwq->pool->attrs);
+ for_each_node(node)
+ rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pwq_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->flush_mutex);
- init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, pool, &last_pwq);
if (last_pwq) {
spin_lock_irq(&last_pwq->pool->lock);
put_pwq(last_pwq);
@@ -3755,7 +3776,15 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
- init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri], NULL);
+ init_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri]);
+
+ mutex_lock(&wq->flush_mutex);
+ spin_lock_irq(&pwq_lock);
+
+ link_pwq(pwq, NULL);
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pwq_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->flush_mutex);
}
return 0;
} else {
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-20 0:00 [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and wq_numa_possible_cpumask[] Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 14:08 ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-03-20 14:48 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 15:43 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 15:48 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 16:43 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: drop 'H' from kworker names of unbound worker pools Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: determine NUMA node of workers accourding to the allowed cpumask Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: add workqueue->unbound_attrs Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: make workqueue->name[] fixed len Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: move hot fields of workqueue_struct to the end Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-03-20 15:52 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 16:04 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 15:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 15:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 15:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 15:32 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 17:08 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 0:00 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: update sysfs interface to reflect NUMA awareness and a kernel param to disable NUMA affinity Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 12:14 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:08 ` [PATCH 11/10] workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 18:57 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-24 16:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-24 18:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-25 19:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-25 20:48 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363737629-16745-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome