mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@gmail.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au,
	davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:48:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130325204807.GA26033@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130325191500.GA12767@htj.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:15:00PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:55:06AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > the whole patchset is more complicated than my brain.
> > 
> > It isn't that complex, is it?  I mean, the difficult part - using
> > multiple pwqs on unbound wq - already happened, and even that wasn't
> > too complex as it in most part synchronized the behaviors between
> > per-cpu and unbound workqueues.  All that NUMA support is doing is
> > mapping different pwqs to different issuing CPUs.
> 
> Oh, BTW, please feel free to rebase your patchset on top of the
> current wq/for-3.10.  I'll take care of the conflicts with the numa
> one, if there are any.

Sorry, never mind.  I'm cherry picking wq->mutex patches.  Will apply
the rebased versions in a couple hours.  Let's base everything else on
top of those.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2013-03-25 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-20  0:00 Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and wq_numa_possible_cpumask[] Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 14:08   ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-03-20 14:48     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 15:43   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 15:48     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 16:43       ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: drop 'H' from kworker names of unbound worker pools Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: determine NUMA node of workers accourding to the allowed cpumask Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: add workqueue->unbound_attrs Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: make workqueue->name[] fixed len Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: move hot fields of workqueue_struct to the end Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq() Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 15:52   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 16:04     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 15:03   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 15:05     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 15:26       ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 15:32         ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 17:08   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 18:54     ` [PATCH v2 UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2013-03-20  0:00 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: update sysfs interface to reflect NUMA awareness and a kernel param to disable NUMA affinity Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 12:14 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-20 17:08 ` [PATCH 11/10] workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 18:57 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-24 16:04   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-24 18:55     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-25 19:15       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-25 20:48         ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130325204807.GA26033@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eag0628@gmail.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zab@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®